Chest Compression Synchronized Ventilation versus Intermitted Positive Pressure Ventilation during Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in a Pig Model.

Guidelines recommend mechanical ventilation with Intermitted Positive Pressure Ventilation (IPPV) during resuscitation. The influence of the novel ventilator mode Chest Compression Synchronized Ventilation (CCSV) on gas exchange and arterial blood pressure compared with IPPV was investigated in a pi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Clemens Kill, Monika Galbas, Christian Neuhaus, Oliver Hahn, Pascal Wallot, Karl Kesper, Hinnerk Wulf, Wolfgang Dersch
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2015-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4444197?pdf=render
id doaj-aaf9a6c377a145c1b1c3f6c91a4016f2
record_format Article
spelling doaj-aaf9a6c377a145c1b1c3f6c91a4016f22020-11-24T21:58:38ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032015-01-01105e012775910.1371/journal.pone.0127759Chest Compression Synchronized Ventilation versus Intermitted Positive Pressure Ventilation during Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in a Pig Model.Clemens KillMonika GalbasChristian NeuhausOliver HahnPascal WallotKarl KesperHinnerk WulfWolfgang DerschGuidelines recommend mechanical ventilation with Intermitted Positive Pressure Ventilation (IPPV) during resuscitation. The influence of the novel ventilator mode Chest Compression Synchronized Ventilation (CCSV) on gas exchange and arterial blood pressure compared with IPPV was investigated in a pig model.In 12 pigs (general anaesthesia/intubation) ventricular fibrillation was induced and continuous chest compressions were started after 3 min. Pigs were mechanically ventilated in a cross-over setting with 5 ventilation periods of 4 min each: Ventilation modes were during the first and last period IPPV (100% O2, tidal volumes = 7 ml/kgKG, respiratory rate = 10/min), during the 2nd, 3rd and 4th period CCSV (100% O2), a pressure-controlled and with each chest compression synchronized breathing pattern with three different presets in randomized order. Presets: CCSVA: P insp = 60 mbar, inspiratory time = 205 ms; CCSVB: P insp = 60 mbar, inspiratory time = 265 ms; CCSVC: P insp = 45 mbar, inspiratory time = 265 ms. Blood gas samples were drawn for each period, mean arterial (MAP) and central venous (CVP) blood pressures were continuously recorded. Results as median (25%/75%percentiles).Ventilation with each CCSV mode resulted in higher PaO2 than IPPV: PaO2: IPPV first: 19.6(13.9/36.2)kPa, IPPV last: 22.7(5.4/36.9)kPa (p = 0.77 vs IPPV first), CCSVA: 48.9(29.0/58.2)kPa (p = 0.028 vs IPPV first, p = 0.0001 vs IPPV last), CCSVB: 54.0 (43.8/64.1) (p = 0.001 vs IPPV first, p = 0.0001 vs IPPV last), CCSVC: 46.0 (20.2/58.4) (p = 0.006 vs IPPV first, p = 0.0001 vs IPPV last). Both the MAP and the difference MAP-CVP did not decrease during twelve minutes CPR with all three presets of CCSV and were higher than the pressures of the last IPPV period.All patterns of CCSV lead to a higher PaO2 and avoid an arterial blood pressure drop during resuscitation compared to IPPV in this pig model of cardiac arrest.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4444197?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Clemens Kill
Monika Galbas
Christian Neuhaus
Oliver Hahn
Pascal Wallot
Karl Kesper
Hinnerk Wulf
Wolfgang Dersch
spellingShingle Clemens Kill
Monika Galbas
Christian Neuhaus
Oliver Hahn
Pascal Wallot
Karl Kesper
Hinnerk Wulf
Wolfgang Dersch
Chest Compression Synchronized Ventilation versus Intermitted Positive Pressure Ventilation during Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in a Pig Model.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Clemens Kill
Monika Galbas
Christian Neuhaus
Oliver Hahn
Pascal Wallot
Karl Kesper
Hinnerk Wulf
Wolfgang Dersch
author_sort Clemens Kill
title Chest Compression Synchronized Ventilation versus Intermitted Positive Pressure Ventilation during Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in a Pig Model.
title_short Chest Compression Synchronized Ventilation versus Intermitted Positive Pressure Ventilation during Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in a Pig Model.
title_full Chest Compression Synchronized Ventilation versus Intermitted Positive Pressure Ventilation during Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in a Pig Model.
title_fullStr Chest Compression Synchronized Ventilation versus Intermitted Positive Pressure Ventilation during Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in a Pig Model.
title_full_unstemmed Chest Compression Synchronized Ventilation versus Intermitted Positive Pressure Ventilation during Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in a Pig Model.
title_sort chest compression synchronized ventilation versus intermitted positive pressure ventilation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation in a pig model.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2015-01-01
description Guidelines recommend mechanical ventilation with Intermitted Positive Pressure Ventilation (IPPV) during resuscitation. The influence of the novel ventilator mode Chest Compression Synchronized Ventilation (CCSV) on gas exchange and arterial blood pressure compared with IPPV was investigated in a pig model.In 12 pigs (general anaesthesia/intubation) ventricular fibrillation was induced and continuous chest compressions were started after 3 min. Pigs were mechanically ventilated in a cross-over setting with 5 ventilation periods of 4 min each: Ventilation modes were during the first and last period IPPV (100% O2, tidal volumes = 7 ml/kgKG, respiratory rate = 10/min), during the 2nd, 3rd and 4th period CCSV (100% O2), a pressure-controlled and with each chest compression synchronized breathing pattern with three different presets in randomized order. Presets: CCSVA: P insp = 60 mbar, inspiratory time = 205 ms; CCSVB: P insp = 60 mbar, inspiratory time = 265 ms; CCSVC: P insp = 45 mbar, inspiratory time = 265 ms. Blood gas samples were drawn for each period, mean arterial (MAP) and central venous (CVP) blood pressures were continuously recorded. Results as median (25%/75%percentiles).Ventilation with each CCSV mode resulted in higher PaO2 than IPPV: PaO2: IPPV first: 19.6(13.9/36.2)kPa, IPPV last: 22.7(5.4/36.9)kPa (p = 0.77 vs IPPV first), CCSVA: 48.9(29.0/58.2)kPa (p = 0.028 vs IPPV first, p = 0.0001 vs IPPV last), CCSVB: 54.0 (43.8/64.1) (p = 0.001 vs IPPV first, p = 0.0001 vs IPPV last), CCSVC: 46.0 (20.2/58.4) (p = 0.006 vs IPPV first, p = 0.0001 vs IPPV last). Both the MAP and the difference MAP-CVP did not decrease during twelve minutes CPR with all three presets of CCSV and were higher than the pressures of the last IPPV period.All patterns of CCSV lead to a higher PaO2 and avoid an arterial blood pressure drop during resuscitation compared to IPPV in this pig model of cardiac arrest.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4444197?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT clemenskill chestcompressionsynchronizedventilationversusintermittedpositivepressureventilationduringcardiopulmonaryresuscitationinapigmodel
AT monikagalbas chestcompressionsynchronizedventilationversusintermittedpositivepressureventilationduringcardiopulmonaryresuscitationinapigmodel
AT christianneuhaus chestcompressionsynchronizedventilationversusintermittedpositivepressureventilationduringcardiopulmonaryresuscitationinapigmodel
AT oliverhahn chestcompressionsynchronizedventilationversusintermittedpositivepressureventilationduringcardiopulmonaryresuscitationinapigmodel
AT pascalwallot chestcompressionsynchronizedventilationversusintermittedpositivepressureventilationduringcardiopulmonaryresuscitationinapigmodel
AT karlkesper chestcompressionsynchronizedventilationversusintermittedpositivepressureventilationduringcardiopulmonaryresuscitationinapigmodel
AT hinnerkwulf chestcompressionsynchronizedventilationversusintermittedpositivepressureventilationduringcardiopulmonaryresuscitationinapigmodel
AT wolfgangdersch chestcompressionsynchronizedventilationversusintermittedpositivepressureventilationduringcardiopulmonaryresuscitationinapigmodel
_version_ 1725851057306730496