The accuracy of the Jamaican national physician register: a study of the status of physicians registered and their countries of training
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The number of physicians per 10,000 population is a basic health indicator used to determine access to health care. Studies from the United States of America and Europe indicate that their physician registration databases may be flaw...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2008-12-01
|
Series: | BMC Health Services Research |
Online Access: | http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/8/253 |
id |
doaj-aaf976a74ee249168a1e49b52b112fb9 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-aaf976a74ee249168a1e49b52b112fb92020-11-24T21:35:58ZengBMCBMC Health Services Research1472-69632008-12-018125310.1186/1472-6963-8-253The accuracy of the Jamaican national physician register: a study of the status of physicians registered and their countries of trainingGray RobertKnight-Madden Jennifer<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The number of physicians per 10,000 population is a basic health indicator used to determine access to health care. Studies from the United States of America and Europe indicate that their physician registration databases may be flawed. Clinical research activities have suggested that the current records of physicians registered to practice in Jamaica may not be accurate. Our objective was to determine whether the Medical Council of Jamaica (MCJ) accurately records and reports the identities, number and specialty designation of physicians in Jamaica. An additional aim was to determine the countries in which these physicians were trained.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Data regarding physicians practicing in Jamaica in 2005 were obtained from multiple sources including the MCJ and the telephone directory. Intense efforts at tracing were undertaken in a sub-sample of physicians, internists and paediatricians to further improve the accuracy of the data. Data were analysed using SPSS, version 11.5.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The MCJ listed 2667 registered physicians of which 118 (4.4%) were no longer practicing in Jamaica. Of the subset of 150 physicians who were more actively traced, an additional 11 were found to be no longer in practice. Thus at least 129 (4.8%) of the physicians on the MCJ list were not actively practising in Jamaica. Twenty-nine qualified physicians who were in practice, but not currently on the Jamaican register, were identified from other data sources. This yielded an estimate of 2567 physicians or 9.68 physicians per 10,000 persons. Seven hundred and twenty six specialists were identified, 118 from the MCJ list only, 452 from other sources, in particular medical associations, and 156 from both the MCJ list and other sources. Sixty-six percent of registered doctors completed medical school at the University of the West Indies (UWI).</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>These data suggest that the MCJ list includes some physicians no longer practicing in Jamaica while underestimating the number of specialists. Difficulty in accurately estimating the number of practicing physicians has been reported in studies done in other countries but the under-reporting of the number of specialists is uncommon. Additional consideration should be given to strategies to ensure compliance with the annual registration that is mandated by law and to changing the law to include registration of specialist qualifications.</p> http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/8/253 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Gray Robert Knight-Madden Jennifer |
spellingShingle |
Gray Robert Knight-Madden Jennifer The accuracy of the Jamaican national physician register: a study of the status of physicians registered and their countries of training BMC Health Services Research |
author_facet |
Gray Robert Knight-Madden Jennifer |
author_sort |
Gray Robert |
title |
The accuracy of the Jamaican national physician register: a study of the status of physicians registered and their countries of training |
title_short |
The accuracy of the Jamaican national physician register: a study of the status of physicians registered and their countries of training |
title_full |
The accuracy of the Jamaican national physician register: a study of the status of physicians registered and their countries of training |
title_fullStr |
The accuracy of the Jamaican national physician register: a study of the status of physicians registered and their countries of training |
title_full_unstemmed |
The accuracy of the Jamaican national physician register: a study of the status of physicians registered and their countries of training |
title_sort |
accuracy of the jamaican national physician register: a study of the status of physicians registered and their countries of training |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
BMC Health Services Research |
issn |
1472-6963 |
publishDate |
2008-12-01 |
description |
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The number of physicians per 10,000 population is a basic health indicator used to determine access to health care. Studies from the United States of America and Europe indicate that their physician registration databases may be flawed. Clinical research activities have suggested that the current records of physicians registered to practice in Jamaica may not be accurate. Our objective was to determine whether the Medical Council of Jamaica (MCJ) accurately records and reports the identities, number and specialty designation of physicians in Jamaica. An additional aim was to determine the countries in which these physicians were trained.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Data regarding physicians practicing in Jamaica in 2005 were obtained from multiple sources including the MCJ and the telephone directory. Intense efforts at tracing were undertaken in a sub-sample of physicians, internists and paediatricians to further improve the accuracy of the data. Data were analysed using SPSS, version 11.5.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The MCJ listed 2667 registered physicians of which 118 (4.4%) were no longer practicing in Jamaica. Of the subset of 150 physicians who were more actively traced, an additional 11 were found to be no longer in practice. Thus at least 129 (4.8%) of the physicians on the MCJ list were not actively practising in Jamaica. Twenty-nine qualified physicians who were in practice, but not currently on the Jamaican register, were identified from other data sources. This yielded an estimate of 2567 physicians or 9.68 physicians per 10,000 persons. Seven hundred and twenty six specialists were identified, 118 from the MCJ list only, 452 from other sources, in particular medical associations, and 156 from both the MCJ list and other sources. Sixty-six percent of registered doctors completed medical school at the University of the West Indies (UWI).</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>These data suggest that the MCJ list includes some physicians no longer practicing in Jamaica while underestimating the number of specialists. Difficulty in accurately estimating the number of practicing physicians has been reported in studies done in other countries but the under-reporting of the number of specialists is uncommon. Additional consideration should be given to strategies to ensure compliance with the annual registration that is mandated by law and to changing the law to include registration of specialist qualifications.</p> |
url |
http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/8/253 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT grayrobert theaccuracyofthejamaicannationalphysicianregisterastudyofthestatusofphysiciansregisteredandtheircountriesoftraining AT knightmaddenjennifer theaccuracyofthejamaicannationalphysicianregisterastudyofthestatusofphysiciansregisteredandtheircountriesoftraining AT grayrobert accuracyofthejamaicannationalphysicianregisterastudyofthestatusofphysiciansregisteredandtheircountriesoftraining AT knightmaddenjennifer accuracyofthejamaicannationalphysicianregisterastudyofthestatusofphysiciansregisteredandtheircountriesoftraining |
_version_ |
1725943098575421440 |