3D LiDAR-Based Precision Vehicle Localization with Movable Region Constraints

This paper discusses a high-performance similarity measurement method based on known map information named the cross mean absolute difference (CMAD) method. Applying the conventional normalized cross-correlation (NCC) feature registration method requires sufficient numbers of feature points, which m...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chih-Ming Hsu, Chung-Wei Shiu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2019-02-01
Series:Sensors
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/19/4/942
id doaj-aad7e37c6f234ed9bae78d9cc35c1022
record_format Article
spelling doaj-aad7e37c6f234ed9bae78d9cc35c10222020-11-25T01:01:11ZengMDPI AGSensors1424-82202019-02-0119494210.3390/s19040942s190409423D LiDAR-Based Precision Vehicle Localization with Movable Region ConstraintsChih-Ming Hsu0Chung-Wei Shiu1Graduate Institute of Mechatronic Engineering, National Taipei University of Technology, Taipei 106, TaiwanGraduate Institute of Mechatronic Engineering, National Taipei University of Technology, Taipei 106, TaiwanThis paper discusses a high-performance similarity measurement method based on known map information named the cross mean absolute difference (CMAD) method. Applying the conventional normalized cross-correlation (NCC) feature registration method requires sufficient numbers of feature points, which must also exhibit near-normal distribution. However, Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) ranging point cloud data scanned and collected on-site are scarce and do not fulfill near-normal distribution. Consequently, considerable localization errors occur when NCC features are registered with map features. Thus, the CMAD method was proposed to effectively improve the NCC algorithm and localization accuracy. Because uncertainties in localization sensors cause deviations in the localization processes, drivable moving regions (DMRs) were established to restrict the range of location searches, filter out unreasonable trajectories, and improve localization speed and performance. An error comparison was conducted between the localization results of the window-based, DMR⁻CMAD, and DMR⁻NCC methods, as well as those of the simultaneous localization and mapping methods. The DMR⁻CMAD method did not differ considerably from the window-based method in its accuracy: the root mean square error in the indoor experiment was no higher than 10 cm, and that of the outdoor experiment was 10⁻30 cm. Additionally, the DMR⁻CMAD method was the least time-consuming of the three methods, and the DMR⁻NCC generated more localization errors and required more localization time than the other two methods. Finally, the DMR⁻CMAD algorithm was employed for the successful on-site instant localization of a car.https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/19/4/942localizationnormalized cross-correlation3D LiDAR
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Chih-Ming Hsu
Chung-Wei Shiu
spellingShingle Chih-Ming Hsu
Chung-Wei Shiu
3D LiDAR-Based Precision Vehicle Localization with Movable Region Constraints
Sensors
localization
normalized cross-correlation
3D LiDAR
author_facet Chih-Ming Hsu
Chung-Wei Shiu
author_sort Chih-Ming Hsu
title 3D LiDAR-Based Precision Vehicle Localization with Movable Region Constraints
title_short 3D LiDAR-Based Precision Vehicle Localization with Movable Region Constraints
title_full 3D LiDAR-Based Precision Vehicle Localization with Movable Region Constraints
title_fullStr 3D LiDAR-Based Precision Vehicle Localization with Movable Region Constraints
title_full_unstemmed 3D LiDAR-Based Precision Vehicle Localization with Movable Region Constraints
title_sort 3d lidar-based precision vehicle localization with movable region constraints
publisher MDPI AG
series Sensors
issn 1424-8220
publishDate 2019-02-01
description This paper discusses a high-performance similarity measurement method based on known map information named the cross mean absolute difference (CMAD) method. Applying the conventional normalized cross-correlation (NCC) feature registration method requires sufficient numbers of feature points, which must also exhibit near-normal distribution. However, Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) ranging point cloud data scanned and collected on-site are scarce and do not fulfill near-normal distribution. Consequently, considerable localization errors occur when NCC features are registered with map features. Thus, the CMAD method was proposed to effectively improve the NCC algorithm and localization accuracy. Because uncertainties in localization sensors cause deviations in the localization processes, drivable moving regions (DMRs) were established to restrict the range of location searches, filter out unreasonable trajectories, and improve localization speed and performance. An error comparison was conducted between the localization results of the window-based, DMR⁻CMAD, and DMR⁻NCC methods, as well as those of the simultaneous localization and mapping methods. The DMR⁻CMAD method did not differ considerably from the window-based method in its accuracy: the root mean square error in the indoor experiment was no higher than 10 cm, and that of the outdoor experiment was 10⁻30 cm. Additionally, the DMR⁻CMAD method was the least time-consuming of the three methods, and the DMR⁻NCC generated more localization errors and required more localization time than the other two methods. Finally, the DMR⁻CMAD algorithm was employed for the successful on-site instant localization of a car.
topic localization
normalized cross-correlation
3D LiDAR
url https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/19/4/942
work_keys_str_mv AT chihminghsu 3dlidarbasedprecisionvehiclelocalizationwithmovableregionconstraints
AT chungweishiu 3dlidarbasedprecisionvehiclelocalizationwithmovableregionconstraints
_version_ 1725210274827337728