Radicalising the Letzbegründung: From Sense-Postulate to Necessity of (an Extended Concept of) Morality

In this paper I intend to illustrate a ‘radicalisation’ of Apel’s ‘ultimate foundation’, which is in my opinion necessary to complete the author’s attempt to justify the ‘moral point of view’. The latter appears indeed to be unfinished, because it does not face the problem of the sense/value of hum...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Linda Lovelli
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Disputatio Editions-IAR 2020-03-01
Series:Disputatio
Subjects:
Online Access:https://studiahumanitatis.eu/ojs/index.php/disputatio/article/view/199
id doaj-aad6cc577e124c32a64eafab8a5642f3
record_format Article
spelling doaj-aad6cc577e124c32a64eafab8a5642f32021-09-13T11:26:54ZengDisputatio Editions-IARDisputatio2254-06012020-03-0191210.5281/10.5281/zenodo.4068603Radicalising the Letzbegründung: From Sense-Postulate to Necessity of (an Extended Concept of) MoralityLinda Lovelli0Università G. D’Annunzio Chieti-Pescara, Italy In this paper I intend to illustrate a ‘radicalisation’ of Apel’s ‘ultimate foundation’, which is in my opinion necessary to complete the author’s attempt to justify the ‘moral point of view’. The latter appears indeed to be unfinished, because it does not face the problem of the sense/value of human existence that – I maintain – is prior to the one of the justification of basic moral principles. I am however convinced that the method of transcendental reflexion defended by Apel can offer the necessary sources to take the missing step and show that the one who questions the sense of human existence cannot avoid presupposing a sense-postulate. I will therefore argue that one cannot avoid recognising the value of human existence, namely that there is ‘something’ in human existence that is worth to be protected and promoted. Such value, as suggested by Charles Taylor in his critical confrontation with discourse ethics, should be articulated in a conception of the good, or even of the ‘highest good’, that in my view has its core in a specific idea of authenticity and ultimately justifies the validity of the moral principles of discourse ethics. https://studiahumanitatis.eu/ojs/index.php/disputatio/article/view/199AuthenticityBasic Moral PrinciplesHighest GoodSense-postulateUltimate Foundations
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Linda Lovelli
spellingShingle Linda Lovelli
Radicalising the Letzbegründung: From Sense-Postulate to Necessity of (an Extended Concept of) Morality
Disputatio
Authenticity
Basic Moral Principles
Highest Good
Sense-postulate
Ultimate Foundations
author_facet Linda Lovelli
author_sort Linda Lovelli
title Radicalising the Letzbegründung: From Sense-Postulate to Necessity of (an Extended Concept of) Morality
title_short Radicalising the Letzbegründung: From Sense-Postulate to Necessity of (an Extended Concept of) Morality
title_full Radicalising the Letzbegründung: From Sense-Postulate to Necessity of (an Extended Concept of) Morality
title_fullStr Radicalising the Letzbegründung: From Sense-Postulate to Necessity of (an Extended Concept of) Morality
title_full_unstemmed Radicalising the Letzbegründung: From Sense-Postulate to Necessity of (an Extended Concept of) Morality
title_sort radicalising the letzbegründung: from sense-postulate to necessity of (an extended concept of) morality
publisher Disputatio Editions-IAR
series Disputatio
issn 2254-0601
publishDate 2020-03-01
description In this paper I intend to illustrate a ‘radicalisation’ of Apel’s ‘ultimate foundation’, which is in my opinion necessary to complete the author’s attempt to justify the ‘moral point of view’. The latter appears indeed to be unfinished, because it does not face the problem of the sense/value of human existence that – I maintain – is prior to the one of the justification of basic moral principles. I am however convinced that the method of transcendental reflexion defended by Apel can offer the necessary sources to take the missing step and show that the one who questions the sense of human existence cannot avoid presupposing a sense-postulate. I will therefore argue that one cannot avoid recognising the value of human existence, namely that there is ‘something’ in human existence that is worth to be protected and promoted. Such value, as suggested by Charles Taylor in his critical confrontation with discourse ethics, should be articulated in a conception of the good, or even of the ‘highest good’, that in my view has its core in a specific idea of authenticity and ultimately justifies the validity of the moral principles of discourse ethics.
topic Authenticity
Basic Moral Principles
Highest Good
Sense-postulate
Ultimate Foundations
url https://studiahumanitatis.eu/ojs/index.php/disputatio/article/view/199
work_keys_str_mv AT lindalovelli radicalisingtheletzbegrundungfromsensepostulatetonecessityofanextendedconceptofmorality
_version_ 1717381045107556352