Is the Evolution of Energy System Productive Structures Driven by a Physical Principle?
The aim of the paper is to identify the consequence of the Constructal Principle in the field of Thermoeconomics of (energy) production systems. This Principle has been recently formulated as an extension of the Maximum Entropy Production Principle and it has been used in literature to explain the s...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021-03-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Sustainability |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frsus.2021.599173/full |
id |
doaj-aacc45f71b9a43b1bfc82c02f0dfecfb |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-aacc45f71b9a43b1bfc82c02f0dfecfb2021-04-02T21:23:30ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Sustainability2673-45242021-03-01210.3389/frsus.2021.599173599173Is the Evolution of Energy System Productive Structures Driven by a Physical Principle?Mauro Reini0Melchiorre Casisi1Department of Engineering and Architecture, University of Trieste, Trieste, ItalyPolytechnic Department of Engineering and Architecture, University of Udine, Udine, ItalyThe aim of the paper is to identify the consequence of the Constructal Principle in the field of Thermoeconomics of (energy) production systems. This Principle has been recently formulated as an extension of the Maximum Entropy Production Principle and it has been used in literature to explain the shape and structure of all kind of flowing systems. First, the concept of Thermoeconomic Environment is defined consistently with the consumption of environmental resources and residual emissions, which inherently characterize every kind of production system. This approach allows to infer that the evolution of any energy system is strictly related to the exploitation of resources from the Thermoeconomic Environment. Moreover, the widely accepted assumption that energy systems have to be optimized by minimizing the specific resource (exergy) cost of products, has to be regarded as a consequence of a physical principle that tells us which energy systems can persist in time (to survive) and which others would be selected for extinction. The paper shows how the creation of a recycle may allow a reduction of the unit exergy cost of the product, obtaining a more sustainable behavior of the macro-system, made up by the production process together with its supply chains, consistently with the Constructal Principle. Finally, the definition of the Thermoeconomic Environment allows (at least in principle) to properly identify the resource (exergy) cost of disposing off residues and sub-products directly in the environment, without any kind of additional operation. As a consequence, residues and sub-products have to be generally converted into some kind of product by different (new) production processes, supporting the paradigm of the Circular Economy and highlighting the importance of recycling not only for system efficiency, but for system surviving. More generally, the results obtained may be regarded as the physical justifications of the evolutionary tendency toward the more and more complex and highly circular pathways that can be observed in both natural and artificial (energy) production systems.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frsus.2021.599173/fullrecyclingcircular economysustainable supply chainsconstructal lawexergy costs |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Mauro Reini Melchiorre Casisi |
spellingShingle |
Mauro Reini Melchiorre Casisi Is the Evolution of Energy System Productive Structures Driven by a Physical Principle? Frontiers in Sustainability recycling circular economy sustainable supply chains constructal law exergy costs |
author_facet |
Mauro Reini Melchiorre Casisi |
author_sort |
Mauro Reini |
title |
Is the Evolution of Energy System Productive Structures Driven by a Physical Principle? |
title_short |
Is the Evolution of Energy System Productive Structures Driven by a Physical Principle? |
title_full |
Is the Evolution of Energy System Productive Structures Driven by a Physical Principle? |
title_fullStr |
Is the Evolution of Energy System Productive Structures Driven by a Physical Principle? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Is the Evolution of Energy System Productive Structures Driven by a Physical Principle? |
title_sort |
is the evolution of energy system productive structures driven by a physical principle? |
publisher |
Frontiers Media S.A. |
series |
Frontiers in Sustainability |
issn |
2673-4524 |
publishDate |
2021-03-01 |
description |
The aim of the paper is to identify the consequence of the Constructal Principle in the field of Thermoeconomics of (energy) production systems. This Principle has been recently formulated as an extension of the Maximum Entropy Production Principle and it has been used in literature to explain the shape and structure of all kind of flowing systems. First, the concept of Thermoeconomic Environment is defined consistently with the consumption of environmental resources and residual emissions, which inherently characterize every kind of production system. This approach allows to infer that the evolution of any energy system is strictly related to the exploitation of resources from the Thermoeconomic Environment. Moreover, the widely accepted assumption that energy systems have to be optimized by minimizing the specific resource (exergy) cost of products, has to be regarded as a consequence of a physical principle that tells us which energy systems can persist in time (to survive) and which others would be selected for extinction. The paper shows how the creation of a recycle may allow a reduction of the unit exergy cost of the product, obtaining a more sustainable behavior of the macro-system, made up by the production process together with its supply chains, consistently with the Constructal Principle. Finally, the definition of the Thermoeconomic Environment allows (at least in principle) to properly identify the resource (exergy) cost of disposing off residues and sub-products directly in the environment, without any kind of additional operation. As a consequence, residues and sub-products have to be generally converted into some kind of product by different (new) production processes, supporting the paradigm of the Circular Economy and highlighting the importance of recycling not only for system efficiency, but for system surviving. More generally, the results obtained may be regarded as the physical justifications of the evolutionary tendency toward the more and more complex and highly circular pathways that can be observed in both natural and artificial (energy) production systems. |
topic |
recycling circular economy sustainable supply chains constructal law exergy costs |
url |
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frsus.2021.599173/full |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT mauroreini istheevolutionofenergysystemproductivestructuresdrivenbyaphysicalprinciple AT melchiorrecasisi istheevolutionofenergysystemproductivestructuresdrivenbyaphysicalprinciple |
_version_ |
1721545421484982272 |