Trust, confidence, and equity affect the legitimacy of natural resource governance

Social-ecological systems are often highly complex, making effective governance a considerable challenge. In large, heterogeneous systems, hierarchical institutional regimes may be efficient, but effective management outcomes are dependent on stakeholder support. This support is shaped by perception...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rachel A. Turner, Jane Addison, Adrian Arias, Brock J. Bergseth, Nadine A. Marshall, Tiffany H. Morrison, Renae C. Tobin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Resilience Alliance 2016-09-01
Series:Ecology and Society
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol21/iss3/art18/
id doaj-aac1b1d948ed4326b930377cb3cda77a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-aac1b1d948ed4326b930377cb3cda77a2020-11-25T00:37:07ZengResilience AllianceEcology and Society1708-30872016-09-012131810.5751/ES-08542-2103188542Trust, confidence, and equity affect the legitimacy of natural resource governanceRachel A. Turner0Jane Addison1Adrian Arias2Brock J. Bergseth3Nadine A. Marshall4Tiffany H. Morrison5Renae C. Tobin6Environment and Sustainability Institute, University of ExeterCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO), Land and WaterAustralian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies, James Cook UniversityAustralian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies, James Cook UniversityCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO), Land and WaterAustralian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies, James Cook UniversityCollege of Science and Engineering, James Cook UniversitySocial-ecological systems are often highly complex, making effective governance a considerable challenge. In large, heterogeneous systems, hierarchical institutional regimes may be efficient, but effective management outcomes are dependent on stakeholder support. This support is shaped by perceptions of legitimacy, which risks being undermined where resource users are not engaged in decision-making. Although legitimacy is demonstrably critical for effective governance, less is known about the factors contributing to stakeholders' perceptions of legitimacy or how these perceptions are socially differentiated. We quantitatively assessed stakeholder perceptions of legitimacy (indicated by support for rules) and their contributory factors among 307 commercial fishers and tourism operators in Australia's Great Barrier Reef Marine Park. Legitimacy was most strongly associated with trust in information from governing bodies, followed by confidence in institutional performance and the equity of management outcomes. Legitimacy differed both within and among resource user groups, which emphasizes the heterogeneous nature of commonly defined stakeholder groups. Overall, tourism operators perceived higher legitimacy than did commercial fishers, which was associated with higher trust in information from management agencies. For fishers, higher levels of trust were associated with: (1) engagement in fisheries that had high subsector cohesion and positive previous experiences of interactions with governing bodies; (2) location in areas with greater proximity to sources of knowledge, resources, and decision-making; and (3) engagement in a Reef Guardian program. These findings highlight the necessity of strategies and processes to build trust among all user groups in large social-ecological systems such as the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park. Furthermore, the social differentiation of perceptions that were observed within user groups underscores the importance of targeted strategies to engage groups that may not be heard through traditional governance channels.http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol21/iss3/art18/fisheriesGreat Barrier Reefjusticemarine conservationtourismtrust
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Rachel A. Turner
Jane Addison
Adrian Arias
Brock J. Bergseth
Nadine A. Marshall
Tiffany H. Morrison
Renae C. Tobin
spellingShingle Rachel A. Turner
Jane Addison
Adrian Arias
Brock J. Bergseth
Nadine A. Marshall
Tiffany H. Morrison
Renae C. Tobin
Trust, confidence, and equity affect the legitimacy of natural resource governance
Ecology and Society
fisheries
Great Barrier Reef
justice
marine conservation
tourism
trust
author_facet Rachel A. Turner
Jane Addison
Adrian Arias
Brock J. Bergseth
Nadine A. Marshall
Tiffany H. Morrison
Renae C. Tobin
author_sort Rachel A. Turner
title Trust, confidence, and equity affect the legitimacy of natural resource governance
title_short Trust, confidence, and equity affect the legitimacy of natural resource governance
title_full Trust, confidence, and equity affect the legitimacy of natural resource governance
title_fullStr Trust, confidence, and equity affect the legitimacy of natural resource governance
title_full_unstemmed Trust, confidence, and equity affect the legitimacy of natural resource governance
title_sort trust, confidence, and equity affect the legitimacy of natural resource governance
publisher Resilience Alliance
series Ecology and Society
issn 1708-3087
publishDate 2016-09-01
description Social-ecological systems are often highly complex, making effective governance a considerable challenge. In large, heterogeneous systems, hierarchical institutional regimes may be efficient, but effective management outcomes are dependent on stakeholder support. This support is shaped by perceptions of legitimacy, which risks being undermined where resource users are not engaged in decision-making. Although legitimacy is demonstrably critical for effective governance, less is known about the factors contributing to stakeholders' perceptions of legitimacy or how these perceptions are socially differentiated. We quantitatively assessed stakeholder perceptions of legitimacy (indicated by support for rules) and their contributory factors among 307 commercial fishers and tourism operators in Australia's Great Barrier Reef Marine Park. Legitimacy was most strongly associated with trust in information from governing bodies, followed by confidence in institutional performance and the equity of management outcomes. Legitimacy differed both within and among resource user groups, which emphasizes the heterogeneous nature of commonly defined stakeholder groups. Overall, tourism operators perceived higher legitimacy than did commercial fishers, which was associated with higher trust in information from management agencies. For fishers, higher levels of trust were associated with: (1) engagement in fisheries that had high subsector cohesion and positive previous experiences of interactions with governing bodies; (2) location in areas with greater proximity to sources of knowledge, resources, and decision-making; and (3) engagement in a Reef Guardian program. These findings highlight the necessity of strategies and processes to build trust among all user groups in large social-ecological systems such as the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park. Furthermore, the social differentiation of perceptions that were observed within user groups underscores the importance of targeted strategies to engage groups that may not be heard through traditional governance channels.
topic fisheries
Great Barrier Reef
justice
marine conservation
tourism
trust
url http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol21/iss3/art18/
work_keys_str_mv AT rachelaturner trustconfidenceandequityaffectthelegitimacyofnaturalresourcegovernance
AT janeaddison trustconfidenceandequityaffectthelegitimacyofnaturalresourcegovernance
AT adrianarias trustconfidenceandequityaffectthelegitimacyofnaturalresourcegovernance
AT brockjbergseth trustconfidenceandequityaffectthelegitimacyofnaturalresourcegovernance
AT nadineamarshall trustconfidenceandequityaffectthelegitimacyofnaturalresourcegovernance
AT tiffanyhmorrison trustconfidenceandequityaffectthelegitimacyofnaturalresourcegovernance
AT renaectobin trustconfidenceandequityaffectthelegitimacyofnaturalresourcegovernance
_version_ 1716140613758353408