Bumbling idiots or evil masterminds? Challenging cold war stereotypes about women, sexuality and state socialism

In academic writing, facts about the past generally require the citation of relevant sources unless the fact or idea is considered “common knowledge:” bits of information or dates upon which there is a wide scholarly consensus. This brief article reflects on the use of “common knowledge” cl...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ghodsee Kristen, Lišková Kateřina
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Institute for Philosophy and Social Theory, Belgrade 2016-01-01
Series:Filozofija i Društvo
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0353-5738/2016/0353-57381603489G.pdf
id doaj-aac174e33437417ebdc35ec770aa0e56
record_format Article
spelling doaj-aac174e33437417ebdc35ec770aa0e562020-11-25T00:10:43ZdeuInstitute for Philosophy and Social Theory, BelgradeFilozofija i Društvo0353-57382334-85772016-01-0127348950310.2298/FID1603489G0353-57381603489GBumbling idiots or evil masterminds? Challenging cold war stereotypes about women, sexuality and state socialismGhodsee Kristen0Lišková Kateřina1Bowdoin College, Gender, Sexuality, and Women’s Studies Program, Brunswick, USAMasaryk University, Department of Sociology, Gender Studies Program, Brno, Czech RepublicIn academic writing, facts about the past generally require the citation of relevant sources unless the fact or idea is considered “common knowledge:” bits of information or dates upon which there is a wide scholarly consensus. This brief article reflects on the use of “common knowledge” claims in contemporary scholarship about women, families, and sexuality as experienced during 20th century, East European, state socialist regimes. We focus on several key stereotypes about the communist state and the situation of women that are often asserted in the scholarly literature, and argue that many of these ideas uncannily resemble American anti-communist propaganda. When contemporary scholars make claims about communist intrusions into the private sphere to effect social engineering or the inefficacy of state socialist mass organizations or communist efforts to break up the family or indoctrinate the young, they often do so without citation to previous sources or empirical evidence supporting their claims, thereby suggesting that such claims are “common knowledge.” We believe that those wishing to assert such claims should link these assertions to concrete originating sources, lest it turn out the “common knowledge” derives, in fact, from western Cold War rhetoric.http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0353-5738/2016/0353-57381603489G.pdfCold Warcommon knowledgestate socialismanti-communismwomenfamilygendersexualityEastern Europecommunism
collection DOAJ
language deu
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ghodsee Kristen
Lišková Kateřina
spellingShingle Ghodsee Kristen
Lišková Kateřina
Bumbling idiots or evil masterminds? Challenging cold war stereotypes about women, sexuality and state socialism
Filozofija i Društvo
Cold War
common knowledge
state socialism
anti-communism
women
family
gender
sexuality
Eastern Europe
communism
author_facet Ghodsee Kristen
Lišková Kateřina
author_sort Ghodsee Kristen
title Bumbling idiots or evil masterminds? Challenging cold war stereotypes about women, sexuality and state socialism
title_short Bumbling idiots or evil masterminds? Challenging cold war stereotypes about women, sexuality and state socialism
title_full Bumbling idiots or evil masterminds? Challenging cold war stereotypes about women, sexuality and state socialism
title_fullStr Bumbling idiots or evil masterminds? Challenging cold war stereotypes about women, sexuality and state socialism
title_full_unstemmed Bumbling idiots or evil masterminds? Challenging cold war stereotypes about women, sexuality and state socialism
title_sort bumbling idiots or evil masterminds? challenging cold war stereotypes about women, sexuality and state socialism
publisher Institute for Philosophy and Social Theory, Belgrade
series Filozofija i Društvo
issn 0353-5738
2334-8577
publishDate 2016-01-01
description In academic writing, facts about the past generally require the citation of relevant sources unless the fact or idea is considered “common knowledge:” bits of information or dates upon which there is a wide scholarly consensus. This brief article reflects on the use of “common knowledge” claims in contemporary scholarship about women, families, and sexuality as experienced during 20th century, East European, state socialist regimes. We focus on several key stereotypes about the communist state and the situation of women that are often asserted in the scholarly literature, and argue that many of these ideas uncannily resemble American anti-communist propaganda. When contemporary scholars make claims about communist intrusions into the private sphere to effect social engineering or the inefficacy of state socialist mass organizations or communist efforts to break up the family or indoctrinate the young, they often do so without citation to previous sources or empirical evidence supporting their claims, thereby suggesting that such claims are “common knowledge.” We believe that those wishing to assert such claims should link these assertions to concrete originating sources, lest it turn out the “common knowledge” derives, in fact, from western Cold War rhetoric.
topic Cold War
common knowledge
state socialism
anti-communism
women
family
gender
sexuality
Eastern Europe
communism
url http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0353-5738/2016/0353-57381603489G.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT ghodseekristen bumblingidiotsorevilmastermindschallengingcoldwarstereotypesaboutwomensexualityandstatesocialism
AT liskovakaterina bumblingidiotsorevilmastermindschallengingcoldwarstereotypesaboutwomensexualityandstatesocialism
_version_ 1725407540202700800