Assessment of conventional and air-jet wheel deflectors for drag reduction of the DrivAer model
Abstract Aerodynamic drag is a large resistance force to vehicle motion, particularly at highway speeds. Conventional wheel deflectors were designed to reduce the wheel drag and, consequently, the overall vehicle drag; however, they may actually be detrimental to vehicle aerodynamics in modern desig...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SpringerOpen
2021-10-01
|
Series: | Advances in Aerodynamics |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s42774-021-00086-7 |
id |
doaj-aaa1c1b0af054601841235ba023f310b |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-aaa1c1b0af054601841235ba023f310b2021-10-03T11:59:20ZengSpringerOpenAdvances in Aerodynamics2524-69922021-10-013112810.1186/s42774-021-00086-7Assessment of conventional and air-jet wheel deflectors for drag reduction of the DrivAer modelKaloki L. Nabutola0Sandra K. S. Boetcher1Department of Mechanical Engineering, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical UniversityDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical UniversityAbstract Aerodynamic drag is a large resistance force to vehicle motion, particularly at highway speeds. Conventional wheel deflectors were designed to reduce the wheel drag and, consequently, the overall vehicle drag; however, they may actually be detrimental to vehicle aerodynamics in modern designs. In the present study, computational fluid dynamics simulations were conducted on the notchback DrivAer model—a simplified, yet realistic, open-source vehicle model that incorporates features of a modern passenger vehicle. Conventional and air-jet wheel deflectors upstream of the front wheels were introduced to assess the effect of underbody-flow deflection on the vehicle drag. Conventional wheel-deflector designs with varying heights were observed and compared to 45∘ and 90∘ air-jet wheel deflectors. The conventional wheel deflectors reduced wheel drag but resulted in an overall drag increase of up to 10%. For the cases studied, the 90∘ air jet did not reduce the overall drag compared to the baseline case; the 45∘ air jet presented drag benefits of up to 1.5% at 35 m/s and above. Compared to conventional wheel deflectors, air-jet wheel deflectors have the potential to reduce vehicle drag to a greater extent and present the benefit of being turned off at lower speeds when flow deflection is undesirable, thus improving efficiency and reducing emissions.https://doi.org/10.1186/s42774-021-00086-7Vehicle aerodynamicsWheel and wheelhouse aerodynamicsAutomotiveActive flow controlPassive flow controlDrivAer |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Kaloki L. Nabutola Sandra K. S. Boetcher |
spellingShingle |
Kaloki L. Nabutola Sandra K. S. Boetcher Assessment of conventional and air-jet wheel deflectors for drag reduction of the DrivAer model Advances in Aerodynamics Vehicle aerodynamics Wheel and wheelhouse aerodynamics Automotive Active flow control Passive flow control DrivAer |
author_facet |
Kaloki L. Nabutola Sandra K. S. Boetcher |
author_sort |
Kaloki L. Nabutola |
title |
Assessment of conventional and air-jet wheel deflectors for drag reduction of the DrivAer model |
title_short |
Assessment of conventional and air-jet wheel deflectors for drag reduction of the DrivAer model |
title_full |
Assessment of conventional and air-jet wheel deflectors for drag reduction of the DrivAer model |
title_fullStr |
Assessment of conventional and air-jet wheel deflectors for drag reduction of the DrivAer model |
title_full_unstemmed |
Assessment of conventional and air-jet wheel deflectors for drag reduction of the DrivAer model |
title_sort |
assessment of conventional and air-jet wheel deflectors for drag reduction of the drivaer model |
publisher |
SpringerOpen |
series |
Advances in Aerodynamics |
issn |
2524-6992 |
publishDate |
2021-10-01 |
description |
Abstract Aerodynamic drag is a large resistance force to vehicle motion, particularly at highway speeds. Conventional wheel deflectors were designed to reduce the wheel drag and, consequently, the overall vehicle drag; however, they may actually be detrimental to vehicle aerodynamics in modern designs. In the present study, computational fluid dynamics simulations were conducted on the notchback DrivAer model—a simplified, yet realistic, open-source vehicle model that incorporates features of a modern passenger vehicle. Conventional and air-jet wheel deflectors upstream of the front wheels were introduced to assess the effect of underbody-flow deflection on the vehicle drag. Conventional wheel-deflector designs with varying heights were observed and compared to 45∘ and 90∘ air-jet wheel deflectors. The conventional wheel deflectors reduced wheel drag but resulted in an overall drag increase of up to 10%. For the cases studied, the 90∘ air jet did not reduce the overall drag compared to the baseline case; the 45∘ air jet presented drag benefits of up to 1.5% at 35 m/s and above. Compared to conventional wheel deflectors, air-jet wheel deflectors have the potential to reduce vehicle drag to a greater extent and present the benefit of being turned off at lower speeds when flow deflection is undesirable, thus improving efficiency and reducing emissions. |
topic |
Vehicle aerodynamics Wheel and wheelhouse aerodynamics Automotive Active flow control Passive flow control DrivAer |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1186/s42774-021-00086-7 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT kalokilnabutola assessmentofconventionalandairjetwheeldeflectorsfordragreductionofthedrivaermodel AT sandraksboetcher assessmentofconventionalandairjetwheeldeflectorsfordragreductionofthedrivaermodel |
_version_ |
1716845068381323264 |