Assessment of conventional and air-jet wheel deflectors for drag reduction of the DrivAer model

Abstract Aerodynamic drag is a large resistance force to vehicle motion, particularly at highway speeds. Conventional wheel deflectors were designed to reduce the wheel drag and, consequently, the overall vehicle drag; however, they may actually be detrimental to vehicle aerodynamics in modern desig...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kaloki L. Nabutola, Sandra K. S. Boetcher
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2021-10-01
Series:Advances in Aerodynamics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s42774-021-00086-7
id doaj-aaa1c1b0af054601841235ba023f310b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-aaa1c1b0af054601841235ba023f310b2021-10-03T11:59:20ZengSpringerOpenAdvances in Aerodynamics2524-69922021-10-013112810.1186/s42774-021-00086-7Assessment of conventional and air-jet wheel deflectors for drag reduction of the DrivAer modelKaloki L. Nabutola0Sandra K. S. Boetcher1Department of Mechanical Engineering, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical UniversityDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical UniversityAbstract Aerodynamic drag is a large resistance force to vehicle motion, particularly at highway speeds. Conventional wheel deflectors were designed to reduce the wheel drag and, consequently, the overall vehicle drag; however, they may actually be detrimental to vehicle aerodynamics in modern designs. In the present study, computational fluid dynamics simulations were conducted on the notchback DrivAer model—a simplified, yet realistic, open-source vehicle model that incorporates features of a modern passenger vehicle. Conventional and air-jet wheel deflectors upstream of the front wheels were introduced to assess the effect of underbody-flow deflection on the vehicle drag. Conventional wheel-deflector designs with varying heights were observed and compared to 45∘ and 90∘ air-jet wheel deflectors. The conventional wheel deflectors reduced wheel drag but resulted in an overall drag increase of up to 10%. For the cases studied, the 90∘ air jet did not reduce the overall drag compared to the baseline case; the 45∘ air jet presented drag benefits of up to 1.5% at 35 m/s and above. Compared to conventional wheel deflectors, air-jet wheel deflectors have the potential to reduce vehicle drag to a greater extent and present the benefit of being turned off at lower speeds when flow deflection is undesirable, thus improving efficiency and reducing emissions.https://doi.org/10.1186/s42774-021-00086-7Vehicle aerodynamicsWheel and wheelhouse aerodynamicsAutomotiveActive flow controlPassive flow controlDrivAer
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kaloki L. Nabutola
Sandra K. S. Boetcher
spellingShingle Kaloki L. Nabutola
Sandra K. S. Boetcher
Assessment of conventional and air-jet wheel deflectors for drag reduction of the DrivAer model
Advances in Aerodynamics
Vehicle aerodynamics
Wheel and wheelhouse aerodynamics
Automotive
Active flow control
Passive flow control
DrivAer
author_facet Kaloki L. Nabutola
Sandra K. S. Boetcher
author_sort Kaloki L. Nabutola
title Assessment of conventional and air-jet wheel deflectors for drag reduction of the DrivAer model
title_short Assessment of conventional and air-jet wheel deflectors for drag reduction of the DrivAer model
title_full Assessment of conventional and air-jet wheel deflectors for drag reduction of the DrivAer model
title_fullStr Assessment of conventional and air-jet wheel deflectors for drag reduction of the DrivAer model
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of conventional and air-jet wheel deflectors for drag reduction of the DrivAer model
title_sort assessment of conventional and air-jet wheel deflectors for drag reduction of the drivaer model
publisher SpringerOpen
series Advances in Aerodynamics
issn 2524-6992
publishDate 2021-10-01
description Abstract Aerodynamic drag is a large resistance force to vehicle motion, particularly at highway speeds. Conventional wheel deflectors were designed to reduce the wheel drag and, consequently, the overall vehicle drag; however, they may actually be detrimental to vehicle aerodynamics in modern designs. In the present study, computational fluid dynamics simulations were conducted on the notchback DrivAer model—a simplified, yet realistic, open-source vehicle model that incorporates features of a modern passenger vehicle. Conventional and air-jet wheel deflectors upstream of the front wheels were introduced to assess the effect of underbody-flow deflection on the vehicle drag. Conventional wheel-deflector designs with varying heights were observed and compared to 45∘ and 90∘ air-jet wheel deflectors. The conventional wheel deflectors reduced wheel drag but resulted in an overall drag increase of up to 10%. For the cases studied, the 90∘ air jet did not reduce the overall drag compared to the baseline case; the 45∘ air jet presented drag benefits of up to 1.5% at 35 m/s and above. Compared to conventional wheel deflectors, air-jet wheel deflectors have the potential to reduce vehicle drag to a greater extent and present the benefit of being turned off at lower speeds when flow deflection is undesirable, thus improving efficiency and reducing emissions.
topic Vehicle aerodynamics
Wheel and wheelhouse aerodynamics
Automotive
Active flow control
Passive flow control
DrivAer
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s42774-021-00086-7
work_keys_str_mv AT kalokilnabutola assessmentofconventionalandairjetwheeldeflectorsfordragreductionofthedrivaermodel
AT sandraksboetcher assessmentofconventionalandairjetwheeldeflectorsfordragreductionofthedrivaermodel
_version_ 1716845068381323264