Effect of Audience Response System on Morbidity and Mortality Conference Engagement

Objectives: Morbidity and mortality (M & M) conference is a central part of emergency medicine residency training. While audience response systems have become popular in traditional didactic teaching, little research has looked at effects in the unique M & M conference setting. We ai...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Matthew Zuckerman, Bonnie Kaplan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Association for Medical Education in Europe (AMEE) 2019-11-01
Series:MedEdPublish
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mededpublish.org/Manuscripts/2640
id doaj-aa712c5568274cfeb5376a2a7b40b47e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-aa712c5568274cfeb5376a2a7b40b47e2020-11-24T21:39:50ZengAssociation for Medical Education in Europe (AMEE)MedEdPublish2312-79962019-11-0183Effect of Audience Response System on Morbidity and Mortality Conference EngagementMatthew Zuckerman0Bonnie Kaplan1University of Colorado School of MedicineUniversity of Colorado School of MedicineObjectives: Morbidity and mortality (M & M) conference is a central part of emergency medicine residency training. While audience response systems have become popular in traditional didactic teaching, little research has looked at effects in the unique M & M conference setting. We aimed to evaluate the effects of an audience response system on engagement in emergency medicine morbidity and mortality conference. Methods: An SMS text and internet-based audience response system was integrated into the M & M conference at one site in our emergency medicine residency. Anonymous, quantitative data about respondents use of the system was collected. Conference attendees were also surveyed to assess their evaluation of the ease of engagement in conference, effects of audience response system on engagement in conference and on perceived audience distractions. Results: The number of participants varied by conference and ranged from 37 to 63 respondents who responded from 1 to 21 times per conference (median 2 responses per respondent per conference). Subjects who used the audience response system were significantly more likely to report improved engagement in conference (p = .002). Subjects with more seniority (Assistant, Associate and Full Professors) reported easier engagement with M&M conference in general (p = .003). The audience response system did not result in significant reduction in audience distractions. Unexpected benefits of the audience response system included increased opportunity for engagement as well as quality of feedback for speakers. Conclusions: The integration of an audience response system into our M&M conference resulted in increased engagement and improved quality of speaker feedback. Further research is needed to evaluate effects on learning retention and clarify effects on audience distractions and behavior. https://www.mededpublish.org/Manuscripts/2640Audience ResponseMorbidity and Mortality ConferenceComputer-Assisted Instruction
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Matthew Zuckerman
Bonnie Kaplan
spellingShingle Matthew Zuckerman
Bonnie Kaplan
Effect of Audience Response System on Morbidity and Mortality Conference Engagement
MedEdPublish
Audience Response
Morbidity and Mortality Conference
Computer-Assisted Instruction
author_facet Matthew Zuckerman
Bonnie Kaplan
author_sort Matthew Zuckerman
title Effect of Audience Response System on Morbidity and Mortality Conference Engagement
title_short Effect of Audience Response System on Morbidity and Mortality Conference Engagement
title_full Effect of Audience Response System on Morbidity and Mortality Conference Engagement
title_fullStr Effect of Audience Response System on Morbidity and Mortality Conference Engagement
title_full_unstemmed Effect of Audience Response System on Morbidity and Mortality Conference Engagement
title_sort effect of audience response system on morbidity and mortality conference engagement
publisher Association for Medical Education in Europe (AMEE)
series MedEdPublish
issn 2312-7996
publishDate 2019-11-01
description Objectives: Morbidity and mortality (M & M) conference is a central part of emergency medicine residency training. While audience response systems have become popular in traditional didactic teaching, little research has looked at effects in the unique M & M conference setting. We aimed to evaluate the effects of an audience response system on engagement in emergency medicine morbidity and mortality conference. Methods: An SMS text and internet-based audience response system was integrated into the M & M conference at one site in our emergency medicine residency. Anonymous, quantitative data about respondents use of the system was collected. Conference attendees were also surveyed to assess their evaluation of the ease of engagement in conference, effects of audience response system on engagement in conference and on perceived audience distractions. Results: The number of participants varied by conference and ranged from 37 to 63 respondents who responded from 1 to 21 times per conference (median 2 responses per respondent per conference). Subjects who used the audience response system were significantly more likely to report improved engagement in conference (p = .002). Subjects with more seniority (Assistant, Associate and Full Professors) reported easier engagement with M&M conference in general (p = .003). The audience response system did not result in significant reduction in audience distractions. Unexpected benefits of the audience response system included increased opportunity for engagement as well as quality of feedback for speakers. Conclusions: The integration of an audience response system into our M&M conference resulted in increased engagement and improved quality of speaker feedback. Further research is needed to evaluate effects on learning retention and clarify effects on audience distractions and behavior.
topic Audience Response
Morbidity and Mortality Conference
Computer-Assisted Instruction
url https://www.mededpublish.org/Manuscripts/2640
work_keys_str_mv AT matthewzuckerman effectofaudienceresponsesystemonmorbidityandmortalityconferenceengagement
AT bonniekaplan effectofaudienceresponsesystemonmorbidityandmortalityconferenceengagement
_version_ 1725928944416325632