Measuring FAIR Principles to Inform Fitness for Use

For open science to flourish, data and any related digital outputs should be discoverable and re-usable by a variety of potential consumers. The recent FAIR Data Principles produced by the Future of Research Communication and e-Scholarship (FORCE11) collective provide a compilation of considerations...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bradley Wade Bishop, Carolyn Hank
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Edinburgh 2018-12-01
Series:International Journal of Digital Curation
Online Access:http://www.ijdc.net/article/view/630
id doaj-aa6992b513144e679bcdc2d25c4ae591
record_format Article
spelling doaj-aa6992b513144e679bcdc2d25c4ae5912020-11-25T02:14:05ZengUniversity of EdinburghInternational Journal of Digital Curation1746-82562018-12-0113110.2218/ijdc.v13i1.630Measuring FAIR Principles to Inform Fitness for UseBradley Wade Bishop0Carolyn Hank1University of TennesseeUniversity of TennesseeFor open science to flourish, data and any related digital outputs should be discoverable and re-usable by a variety of potential consumers. The recent FAIR Data Principles produced by the Future of Research Communication and e-Scholarship (FORCE11) collective provide a compilation of considerations for making data findable, accessible, interoperable, and re-usable. The principles serve as guideposts to ‘good’ data management and stewardship for data and/or metadata. On a conceptual level, the principles codify best practices that managers and stewards would find agreement with, exist in other data quality metrics, and already implement. This paper reports on a secondary purpose of the principles: to inform assessment of data’s FAIR-ness or, put another way, data’s fitness for use. Assessment of FAIR-ness likely requires more stratification across data types and among various consumer communities, as how data are found, accessed, interoperated, and re-used differs depending on types and purposes. This paper’s purpose is to present a method for qualitatively measuring the FAIR Data Principles through operationalizing findability, accessibility, interoperability, and re- usability from a re-user’s perspective. The findings may inform assessments that could also be used to develop situationally-relevant fitness for use frameworks. http://www.ijdc.net/article/view/630
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Bradley Wade Bishop
Carolyn Hank
spellingShingle Bradley Wade Bishop
Carolyn Hank
Measuring FAIR Principles to Inform Fitness for Use
International Journal of Digital Curation
author_facet Bradley Wade Bishop
Carolyn Hank
author_sort Bradley Wade Bishop
title Measuring FAIR Principles to Inform Fitness for Use
title_short Measuring FAIR Principles to Inform Fitness for Use
title_full Measuring FAIR Principles to Inform Fitness for Use
title_fullStr Measuring FAIR Principles to Inform Fitness for Use
title_full_unstemmed Measuring FAIR Principles to Inform Fitness for Use
title_sort measuring fair principles to inform fitness for use
publisher University of Edinburgh
series International Journal of Digital Curation
issn 1746-8256
publishDate 2018-12-01
description For open science to flourish, data and any related digital outputs should be discoverable and re-usable by a variety of potential consumers. The recent FAIR Data Principles produced by the Future of Research Communication and e-Scholarship (FORCE11) collective provide a compilation of considerations for making data findable, accessible, interoperable, and re-usable. The principles serve as guideposts to ‘good’ data management and stewardship for data and/or metadata. On a conceptual level, the principles codify best practices that managers and stewards would find agreement with, exist in other data quality metrics, and already implement. This paper reports on a secondary purpose of the principles: to inform assessment of data’s FAIR-ness or, put another way, data’s fitness for use. Assessment of FAIR-ness likely requires more stratification across data types and among various consumer communities, as how data are found, accessed, interoperated, and re-used differs depending on types and purposes. This paper’s purpose is to present a method for qualitatively measuring the FAIR Data Principles through operationalizing findability, accessibility, interoperability, and re- usability from a re-user’s perspective. The findings may inform assessments that could also be used to develop situationally-relevant fitness for use frameworks.
url http://www.ijdc.net/article/view/630
work_keys_str_mv AT bradleywadebishop measuringfairprinciplestoinformfitnessforuse
AT carolynhank measuringfairprinciplestoinformfitnessforuse
_version_ 1724902150095503360