Measuring FAIR Principles to Inform Fitness for Use
For open science to flourish, data and any related digital outputs should be discoverable and re-usable by a variety of potential consumers. The recent FAIR Data Principles produced by the Future of Research Communication and e-Scholarship (FORCE11) collective provide a compilation of considerations...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
University of Edinburgh
2018-12-01
|
Series: | International Journal of Digital Curation |
Online Access: | http://www.ijdc.net/article/view/630 |
id |
doaj-aa6992b513144e679bcdc2d25c4ae591 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-aa6992b513144e679bcdc2d25c4ae5912020-11-25T02:14:05ZengUniversity of EdinburghInternational Journal of Digital Curation1746-82562018-12-0113110.2218/ijdc.v13i1.630Measuring FAIR Principles to Inform Fitness for UseBradley Wade Bishop0Carolyn Hank1University of TennesseeUniversity of TennesseeFor open science to flourish, data and any related digital outputs should be discoverable and re-usable by a variety of potential consumers. The recent FAIR Data Principles produced by the Future of Research Communication and e-Scholarship (FORCE11) collective provide a compilation of considerations for making data findable, accessible, interoperable, and re-usable. The principles serve as guideposts to ‘good’ data management and stewardship for data and/or metadata. On a conceptual level, the principles codify best practices that managers and stewards would find agreement with, exist in other data quality metrics, and already implement. This paper reports on a secondary purpose of the principles: to inform assessment of data’s FAIR-ness or, put another way, data’s fitness for use. Assessment of FAIR-ness likely requires more stratification across data types and among various consumer communities, as how data are found, accessed, interoperated, and re-used differs depending on types and purposes. This paper’s purpose is to present a method for qualitatively measuring the FAIR Data Principles through operationalizing findability, accessibility, interoperability, and re- usability from a re-user’s perspective. The findings may inform assessments that could also be used to develop situationally-relevant fitness for use frameworks. http://www.ijdc.net/article/view/630 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Bradley Wade Bishop Carolyn Hank |
spellingShingle |
Bradley Wade Bishop Carolyn Hank Measuring FAIR Principles to Inform Fitness for Use International Journal of Digital Curation |
author_facet |
Bradley Wade Bishop Carolyn Hank |
author_sort |
Bradley Wade Bishop |
title |
Measuring FAIR Principles to Inform Fitness for Use |
title_short |
Measuring FAIR Principles to Inform Fitness for Use |
title_full |
Measuring FAIR Principles to Inform Fitness for Use |
title_fullStr |
Measuring FAIR Principles to Inform Fitness for Use |
title_full_unstemmed |
Measuring FAIR Principles to Inform Fitness for Use |
title_sort |
measuring fair principles to inform fitness for use |
publisher |
University of Edinburgh |
series |
International Journal of Digital Curation |
issn |
1746-8256 |
publishDate |
2018-12-01 |
description |
For open science to flourish, data and any related digital outputs should be discoverable and re-usable by a variety of potential consumers. The recent FAIR Data Principles produced by the Future of Research Communication and e-Scholarship (FORCE11) collective provide a compilation of considerations for making data findable, accessible, interoperable, and re-usable. The principles serve as guideposts to ‘good’ data management and stewardship for data and/or metadata. On a conceptual level, the principles codify best practices that managers and stewards would find agreement with, exist in other data quality metrics, and already implement. This paper reports on a secondary purpose of the principles: to inform assessment of data’s FAIR-ness or, put another way, data’s fitness for use. Assessment of FAIR-ness likely requires more stratification across data types and among various consumer communities, as how data are found, accessed, interoperated, and re-used differs depending on types and purposes. This paper’s purpose is to present a method for qualitatively measuring the FAIR Data Principles through operationalizing findability, accessibility, interoperability, and re- usability from a re-user’s perspective. The findings may inform assessments that could also be used to develop situationally-relevant fitness for use frameworks.
|
url |
http://www.ijdc.net/article/view/630 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT bradleywadebishop measuringfairprinciplestoinformfitnessforuse AT carolynhank measuringfairprinciplestoinformfitnessforuse |
_version_ |
1724902150095503360 |