Monitoring Air Pollution Variability during Disasters

National environmental regulations lack short-term standards for variability in fine particulate matter (PM<sub>2.5</sub>); they depend solely on concentration-based standards. Twenty-five years of research has linked short-term PM<sub>2.5</sub>, that is, increases of at leas...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Earthea Nance
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-03-01
Series:Atmosphere
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4433/12/4/420
id doaj-aa6160bccac940798ce0831ce5b77171
record_format Article
spelling doaj-aa6160bccac940798ce0831ce5b771712021-03-26T00:03:50ZengMDPI AGAtmosphere2073-44332021-03-011242042010.3390/atmos12040420Monitoring Air Pollution Variability during DisastersEarthea Nance0Department of Urban Planning and Environmental Policy, Texas Southern University, Houston, TX 77004, USANational environmental regulations lack short-term standards for variability in fine particulate matter (PM<sub>2.5</sub>); they depend solely on concentration-based standards. Twenty-five years of research has linked short-term PM<sub>2.5</sub>, that is, increases of at least 10 μg/m<sup>3</sup> that can occur in-between regulatory readings, to increased mortality. Even as new technologies have emerged that could readily monitor short-term PM<sub>2.5</sub>, such as real-time monitoring and mobile monitoring, their primary application has been for research, not for air quality management. The Gulf oil spill offers a strategic setting in which regulatory monitoring, computer modeling, and stationary monitoring could be directly compared to mobile monitoring. Mobile monitoring was found to best capture the variability of PM<sub>2.5</sub> during the disaster. The research also found that each short-term increase (≥10 μg/m<sup>3</sup>) in fine particulate matter was associated with a statistically significant increase of 0.105 deaths (<i>p</i> < 0.001) in people aged 65 and over, which represents a 0.32% increase. This research contributes to understanding the effects of PM<sub>2.5</sub> on mortality during a disaster and provides justification for environmental managers to monitor PM<sub>2.5</sub> variability, not only hourly averages of PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentration.https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4433/12/4/420air pollutionparticulate mattermobile monitoringshort-term exposuremortalityGulf oil spill
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Earthea Nance
spellingShingle Earthea Nance
Monitoring Air Pollution Variability during Disasters
Atmosphere
air pollution
particulate matter
mobile monitoring
short-term exposure
mortality
Gulf oil spill
author_facet Earthea Nance
author_sort Earthea Nance
title Monitoring Air Pollution Variability during Disasters
title_short Monitoring Air Pollution Variability during Disasters
title_full Monitoring Air Pollution Variability during Disasters
title_fullStr Monitoring Air Pollution Variability during Disasters
title_full_unstemmed Monitoring Air Pollution Variability during Disasters
title_sort monitoring air pollution variability during disasters
publisher MDPI AG
series Atmosphere
issn 2073-4433
publishDate 2021-03-01
description National environmental regulations lack short-term standards for variability in fine particulate matter (PM<sub>2.5</sub>); they depend solely on concentration-based standards. Twenty-five years of research has linked short-term PM<sub>2.5</sub>, that is, increases of at least 10 μg/m<sup>3</sup> that can occur in-between regulatory readings, to increased mortality. Even as new technologies have emerged that could readily monitor short-term PM<sub>2.5</sub>, such as real-time monitoring and mobile monitoring, their primary application has been for research, not for air quality management. The Gulf oil spill offers a strategic setting in which regulatory monitoring, computer modeling, and stationary monitoring could be directly compared to mobile monitoring. Mobile monitoring was found to best capture the variability of PM<sub>2.5</sub> during the disaster. The research also found that each short-term increase (≥10 μg/m<sup>3</sup>) in fine particulate matter was associated with a statistically significant increase of 0.105 deaths (<i>p</i> < 0.001) in people aged 65 and over, which represents a 0.32% increase. This research contributes to understanding the effects of PM<sub>2.5</sub> on mortality during a disaster and provides justification for environmental managers to monitor PM<sub>2.5</sub> variability, not only hourly averages of PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentration.
topic air pollution
particulate matter
mobile monitoring
short-term exposure
mortality
Gulf oil spill
url https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4433/12/4/420
work_keys_str_mv AT eartheanance monitoringairpollutionvariabilityduringdisasters
_version_ 1724203225791332352