A Scoping Review and Thematic Classification of Patient Complexity: Offering a Unifying Framework

• Main Authors: Alexis K. Schaink, Kerry Kuluski, Renée F. Lyons, Martin Fortin, Alejandro R. Jadad, Ross Upshur, Walter P. Wodchis
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: SAGE Publishing 2012-01-01
• Series: Journal of Comorbidity
• Online Access: https://doi.org/10.15256/joc.2012.2.15

The path to improving healthcare quality for individuals with complex health conditions is complicated by a lack of common understanding of complexity. Modern medicine, together with social and environmental factors, has extended life, leading to a growing population of patients with chronic conditions. In many cases, there are social and psychological factors that impact treatment, health outcomes, and quality of life. This is the face of complexity. Care challenges, burden, and cost have positioned complexity as an important health issue. Complex chronic conditions are now being discussed by clinicians, researchers, and policy-makers around such issues as quantification, payment schemes, transitions, management models, clinical practice, and improved patient experience. We conducted a scoping review of the literature for definitions and descriptions of complexity. We provide an overview of complex chronic conditions, and what is known about complexity, and describe variations in how it is understood. We developed a Complexity Framework from these findings to guide our approach to understanding patient complexity. It is critical to use common vernacular and conceptualization of complexity to improve service and outcomes for patients with complex chronic conditions. Many questions still persist about how to develop this work with a health and social care lens; our framework offers a foundation to structure thinking about complex patients. Further insight into patient complexity can inform treatment models and goals of care, and identify required services and barriers to the management of complexity.