A comparison among fuzzy multi-criteria decision making, bivariate, multivariate and machine learning models in landslide susceptibility mapping

Landslides are dangerous events which threaten both human life and property. The study aims to analyze the landslide susceptibility (LS) in the Kysuca river basin, Slovakia. For this reason, previous landslide events were analyzed with 16 landslide conditioning factors. Landslide inventory was divid...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Quoc Bao Pham, Yacine Achour, Sk Ajim Ali, Farhana Parvin, Matej Vojtek, Jana Vojteková, Nadhir Al-Ansari, A. L. Achu, Romulus Costache, Khaled Mohamed Khedher, Duong Tran Anh
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2021-01-01
Series:Geomatics, Natural Hazards & Risk
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2021.1944330
id doaj-aa3dab3e5c294e5e9f4d05f6ff0af0c5
record_format Article
spelling doaj-aa3dab3e5c294e5e9f4d05f6ff0af0c52021-07-15T13:47:53ZengTaylor & Francis GroupGeomatics, Natural Hazards & Risk1947-57051947-57132021-01-011211741177710.1080/19475705.2021.19443301944330A comparison among fuzzy multi-criteria decision making, bivariate, multivariate and machine learning models in landslide susceptibility mappingQuoc Bao Pham0Yacine Achour1Sk Ajim Ali2Farhana Parvin3Matej Vojtek4Jana Vojteková5Nadhir Al-Ansari6A. L. Achu7Romulus Costache8Khaled Mohamed Khedher9Duong Tran Anh10Institute of Applied Technology, Thu Dau Mot UniversityDepartment of Civil Engineering, Bordj Bou Arreridj UniversityFaculty of Science, Department of Geography, Aligarh Muslim UniversityFaculty of Science, Department of Geography, Aligarh Muslim UniversityDepartment of Geography and Regional Development, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Constantine the Philosopher University in Nitra, NitraDepartment of Geography and Regional Development, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Constantine the Philosopher University in Nitra, NitraDepartment of Civil, Environmental and Natural Resources Engineering, Lulea University of TechnologyDepartment of Remote Sensing and GIS, Kerala University of Fisheries and Ocean StudiesDepartment of Civil Engineering, Transilvania University of BrasovDepartment of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, King Khalid UniversityHo Chi Minh City University of Technology (HUTECH) 475ALandslides are dangerous events which threaten both human life and property. The study aims to analyze the landslide susceptibility (LS) in the Kysuca river basin, Slovakia. For this reason, previous landslide events were analyzed with 16 landslide conditioning factors. Landslide inventory was divided into training (70% of landslide locations) and validating dataset (30% of landslide locations). The heuristic approach of Fuzzy Decision Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (FDEMATEL)-Analytic Network Process (ANP) was applied first, followed by bivariate Frequency Ratio (FR), multivariate Logistic Regression (LR), Random Forest Classifier (RFC), Naïve Bayes Classifier (NBC) and Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), respectively. The results showed that 52.2%, 36.5%, 40.7%, 50.6%, 43.6% and 40.3% of the total basin area had very high to high LS corresponding to FDEMATEL-ANP, FR, LR, RFC, NBC and XGBoost model, respectively. The analysis revealed that RFC was the most accurate model (overall accuracy of 98.3% and AUC of 97.0%). Besides, the heuristic approach of FDEMATEL-ANP model (overall accuracy of 93.8% and AUC of 92.4%) had better prediction capability than bivariate FR (overall accuracy of 86.9% and AUC of 86.1%), multivariate LR (overall accuracy of 90.5% and AUC of 91.2%), machine learning NBC (overall accuracy of 76.3% and AUC of 90.9%) and even deep learning XGBoost (overall accuracy of 92.3% and AUC of 87.1%) models. The study revealed that the FDEMATEL-ANP outweighed the NBC and XGBoost machine learning models, which suggests that heuristic methods should be tested out before directly applying machine learning models.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2021.1944330fuzzy dematel-anpbivariate frequency ratiomultivariate logistic regressionmachine learninglandslide susceptibility mapping
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Quoc Bao Pham
Yacine Achour
Sk Ajim Ali
Farhana Parvin
Matej Vojtek
Jana Vojteková
Nadhir Al-Ansari
A. L. Achu
Romulus Costache
Khaled Mohamed Khedher
Duong Tran Anh
spellingShingle Quoc Bao Pham
Yacine Achour
Sk Ajim Ali
Farhana Parvin
Matej Vojtek
Jana Vojteková
Nadhir Al-Ansari
A. L. Achu
Romulus Costache
Khaled Mohamed Khedher
Duong Tran Anh
A comparison among fuzzy multi-criteria decision making, bivariate, multivariate and machine learning models in landslide susceptibility mapping
Geomatics, Natural Hazards & Risk
fuzzy dematel-anp
bivariate frequency ratio
multivariate logistic regression
machine learning
landslide susceptibility mapping
author_facet Quoc Bao Pham
Yacine Achour
Sk Ajim Ali
Farhana Parvin
Matej Vojtek
Jana Vojteková
Nadhir Al-Ansari
A. L. Achu
Romulus Costache
Khaled Mohamed Khedher
Duong Tran Anh
author_sort Quoc Bao Pham
title A comparison among fuzzy multi-criteria decision making, bivariate, multivariate and machine learning models in landslide susceptibility mapping
title_short A comparison among fuzzy multi-criteria decision making, bivariate, multivariate and machine learning models in landslide susceptibility mapping
title_full A comparison among fuzzy multi-criteria decision making, bivariate, multivariate and machine learning models in landslide susceptibility mapping
title_fullStr A comparison among fuzzy multi-criteria decision making, bivariate, multivariate and machine learning models in landslide susceptibility mapping
title_full_unstemmed A comparison among fuzzy multi-criteria decision making, bivariate, multivariate and machine learning models in landslide susceptibility mapping
title_sort comparison among fuzzy multi-criteria decision making, bivariate, multivariate and machine learning models in landslide susceptibility mapping
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
series Geomatics, Natural Hazards & Risk
issn 1947-5705
1947-5713
publishDate 2021-01-01
description Landslides are dangerous events which threaten both human life and property. The study aims to analyze the landslide susceptibility (LS) in the Kysuca river basin, Slovakia. For this reason, previous landslide events were analyzed with 16 landslide conditioning factors. Landslide inventory was divided into training (70% of landslide locations) and validating dataset (30% of landslide locations). The heuristic approach of Fuzzy Decision Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (FDEMATEL)-Analytic Network Process (ANP) was applied first, followed by bivariate Frequency Ratio (FR), multivariate Logistic Regression (LR), Random Forest Classifier (RFC), Naïve Bayes Classifier (NBC) and Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), respectively. The results showed that 52.2%, 36.5%, 40.7%, 50.6%, 43.6% and 40.3% of the total basin area had very high to high LS corresponding to FDEMATEL-ANP, FR, LR, RFC, NBC and XGBoost model, respectively. The analysis revealed that RFC was the most accurate model (overall accuracy of 98.3% and AUC of 97.0%). Besides, the heuristic approach of FDEMATEL-ANP model (overall accuracy of 93.8% and AUC of 92.4%) had better prediction capability than bivariate FR (overall accuracy of 86.9% and AUC of 86.1%), multivariate LR (overall accuracy of 90.5% and AUC of 91.2%), machine learning NBC (overall accuracy of 76.3% and AUC of 90.9%) and even deep learning XGBoost (overall accuracy of 92.3% and AUC of 87.1%) models. The study revealed that the FDEMATEL-ANP outweighed the NBC and XGBoost machine learning models, which suggests that heuristic methods should be tested out before directly applying machine learning models.
topic fuzzy dematel-anp
bivariate frequency ratio
multivariate logistic regression
machine learning
landslide susceptibility mapping
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2021.1944330
work_keys_str_mv AT quocbaopham acomparisonamongfuzzymulticriteriadecisionmakingbivariatemultivariateandmachinelearningmodelsinlandslidesusceptibilitymapping
AT yacineachour acomparisonamongfuzzymulticriteriadecisionmakingbivariatemultivariateandmachinelearningmodelsinlandslidesusceptibilitymapping
AT skajimali acomparisonamongfuzzymulticriteriadecisionmakingbivariatemultivariateandmachinelearningmodelsinlandslidesusceptibilitymapping
AT farhanaparvin acomparisonamongfuzzymulticriteriadecisionmakingbivariatemultivariateandmachinelearningmodelsinlandslidesusceptibilitymapping
AT matejvojtek acomparisonamongfuzzymulticriteriadecisionmakingbivariatemultivariateandmachinelearningmodelsinlandslidesusceptibilitymapping
AT janavojtekova acomparisonamongfuzzymulticriteriadecisionmakingbivariatemultivariateandmachinelearningmodelsinlandslidesusceptibilitymapping
AT nadhiralansari acomparisonamongfuzzymulticriteriadecisionmakingbivariatemultivariateandmachinelearningmodelsinlandslidesusceptibilitymapping
AT alachu acomparisonamongfuzzymulticriteriadecisionmakingbivariatemultivariateandmachinelearningmodelsinlandslidesusceptibilitymapping
AT romuluscostache acomparisonamongfuzzymulticriteriadecisionmakingbivariatemultivariateandmachinelearningmodelsinlandslidesusceptibilitymapping
AT khaledmohamedkhedher acomparisonamongfuzzymulticriteriadecisionmakingbivariatemultivariateandmachinelearningmodelsinlandslidesusceptibilitymapping
AT duongtrananh acomparisonamongfuzzymulticriteriadecisionmakingbivariatemultivariateandmachinelearningmodelsinlandslidesusceptibilitymapping
AT quocbaopham comparisonamongfuzzymulticriteriadecisionmakingbivariatemultivariateandmachinelearningmodelsinlandslidesusceptibilitymapping
AT yacineachour comparisonamongfuzzymulticriteriadecisionmakingbivariatemultivariateandmachinelearningmodelsinlandslidesusceptibilitymapping
AT skajimali comparisonamongfuzzymulticriteriadecisionmakingbivariatemultivariateandmachinelearningmodelsinlandslidesusceptibilitymapping
AT farhanaparvin comparisonamongfuzzymulticriteriadecisionmakingbivariatemultivariateandmachinelearningmodelsinlandslidesusceptibilitymapping
AT matejvojtek comparisonamongfuzzymulticriteriadecisionmakingbivariatemultivariateandmachinelearningmodelsinlandslidesusceptibilitymapping
AT janavojtekova comparisonamongfuzzymulticriteriadecisionmakingbivariatemultivariateandmachinelearningmodelsinlandslidesusceptibilitymapping
AT nadhiralansari comparisonamongfuzzymulticriteriadecisionmakingbivariatemultivariateandmachinelearningmodelsinlandslidesusceptibilitymapping
AT alachu comparisonamongfuzzymulticriteriadecisionmakingbivariatemultivariateandmachinelearningmodelsinlandslidesusceptibilitymapping
AT romuluscostache comparisonamongfuzzymulticriteriadecisionmakingbivariatemultivariateandmachinelearningmodelsinlandslidesusceptibilitymapping
AT khaledmohamedkhedher comparisonamongfuzzymulticriteriadecisionmakingbivariatemultivariateandmachinelearningmodelsinlandslidesusceptibilitymapping
AT duongtrananh comparisonamongfuzzymulticriteriadecisionmakingbivariatemultivariateandmachinelearningmodelsinlandslidesusceptibilitymapping
_version_ 1721300709727535104