Root and alveolar bone changes in first premolars adjacent to the traction of buccal versus palatal maxillary impacted canines.
OBJECTIVE:To compare the root and alveolar bone changes in first premolars adjacent to the orthodontic traction of buccal versus palatal maxillary impacted canines (MIC). MATERIALS AND METHODS:Before and after traction, cone beam tomographic computed (CBCTs) of 25 subjects with unilateral/bilateral...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2019-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0226267 |
id |
doaj-aa3275cc029f4d15b53e17de39b21694 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-aa3275cc029f4d15b53e17de39b216942021-03-03T21:20:29ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032019-01-011412e022626710.1371/journal.pone.0226267Root and alveolar bone changes in first premolars adjacent to the traction of buccal versus palatal maxillary impacted canines.Yalil Augusto Rodríguez-CárdenasGustavo Armando Ruíz-MoraAron Aliaga-Del CastilloHeraldo Luis Dias-Da SilveiraLuis Ernesto Arriola-GuillénOBJECTIVE:To compare the root and alveolar bone changes in first premolars adjacent to the orthodontic traction of buccal versus palatal maxillary impacted canines (MIC). MATERIALS AND METHODS:Before and after traction, cone beam tomographic computed (CBCTs) of 25 subjects with unilateral/bilateral MIC were included in this follow-up and retrospective study. Thirty-six first premolars were divided into 2 groups, buccal (n = 15) or palatal (n = 21) MIC, and the tomographic images were evaluated before and after orthodontic traction. Root changes in length and area were measured in sagittal, coronal and axial sections. Dimensions of alveolar bone were evaluated in coronal sections. Intergroup and intragroup comparisons were performed using t or Mann-Whitney U tests. Multiple linear regressions analyses were used to evaluate the influence of all predictor variables on root and alveolar bone changes (P<0.05). RESULTS:Root and alveolar bone changes produced by orthodontic traction were not significant between groups. Root changes were smaller than 1 mm (length) and 2.51 mm2 (area). Alveolar bone changes between buccal and palatal MIC groups ranged from 0.13 mm to 1.69 mm Furthermore, the multivariate analysis showed no significant influence of the impaction condition (buccal or palatal) on root change. Nevertheless, some different predictor variables of the MIC influence these changes. In the alveolar bone, the maximum upper alveolar width (MUAW) is the most affected by the traction of the MIC. CONCLUSIONS:Orthodontic traction of buccal vs palatal MIC produces similar resorptive and appositional root and alveolar bone changes in the adjacent first premolars, without clinical relevance.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0226267 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Yalil Augusto Rodríguez-Cárdenas Gustavo Armando Ruíz-Mora Aron Aliaga-Del Castillo Heraldo Luis Dias-Da Silveira Luis Ernesto Arriola-Guillén |
spellingShingle |
Yalil Augusto Rodríguez-Cárdenas Gustavo Armando Ruíz-Mora Aron Aliaga-Del Castillo Heraldo Luis Dias-Da Silveira Luis Ernesto Arriola-Guillén Root and alveolar bone changes in first premolars adjacent to the traction of buccal versus palatal maxillary impacted canines. PLoS ONE |
author_facet |
Yalil Augusto Rodríguez-Cárdenas Gustavo Armando Ruíz-Mora Aron Aliaga-Del Castillo Heraldo Luis Dias-Da Silveira Luis Ernesto Arriola-Guillén |
author_sort |
Yalil Augusto Rodríguez-Cárdenas |
title |
Root and alveolar bone changes in first premolars adjacent to the traction of buccal versus palatal maxillary impacted canines. |
title_short |
Root and alveolar bone changes in first premolars adjacent to the traction of buccal versus palatal maxillary impacted canines. |
title_full |
Root and alveolar bone changes in first premolars adjacent to the traction of buccal versus palatal maxillary impacted canines. |
title_fullStr |
Root and alveolar bone changes in first premolars adjacent to the traction of buccal versus palatal maxillary impacted canines. |
title_full_unstemmed |
Root and alveolar bone changes in first premolars adjacent to the traction of buccal versus palatal maxillary impacted canines. |
title_sort |
root and alveolar bone changes in first premolars adjacent to the traction of buccal versus palatal maxillary impacted canines. |
publisher |
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
series |
PLoS ONE |
issn |
1932-6203 |
publishDate |
2019-01-01 |
description |
OBJECTIVE:To compare the root and alveolar bone changes in first premolars adjacent to the orthodontic traction of buccal versus palatal maxillary impacted canines (MIC). MATERIALS AND METHODS:Before and after traction, cone beam tomographic computed (CBCTs) of 25 subjects with unilateral/bilateral MIC were included in this follow-up and retrospective study. Thirty-six first premolars were divided into 2 groups, buccal (n = 15) or palatal (n = 21) MIC, and the tomographic images were evaluated before and after orthodontic traction. Root changes in length and area were measured in sagittal, coronal and axial sections. Dimensions of alveolar bone were evaluated in coronal sections. Intergroup and intragroup comparisons were performed using t or Mann-Whitney U tests. Multiple linear regressions analyses were used to evaluate the influence of all predictor variables on root and alveolar bone changes (P<0.05). RESULTS:Root and alveolar bone changes produced by orthodontic traction were not significant between groups. Root changes were smaller than 1 mm (length) and 2.51 mm2 (area). Alveolar bone changes between buccal and palatal MIC groups ranged from 0.13 mm to 1.69 mm Furthermore, the multivariate analysis showed no significant influence of the impaction condition (buccal or palatal) on root change. Nevertheless, some different predictor variables of the MIC influence these changes. In the alveolar bone, the maximum upper alveolar width (MUAW) is the most affected by the traction of the MIC. CONCLUSIONS:Orthodontic traction of buccal vs palatal MIC produces similar resorptive and appositional root and alveolar bone changes in the adjacent first premolars, without clinical relevance. |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0226267 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT yalilaugustorodriguezcardenas rootandalveolarbonechangesinfirstpremolarsadjacenttothetractionofbuccalversuspalatalmaxillaryimpactedcanines AT gustavoarmandoruizmora rootandalveolarbonechangesinfirstpremolarsadjacenttothetractionofbuccalversuspalatalmaxillaryimpactedcanines AT aronaliagadelcastillo rootandalveolarbonechangesinfirstpremolarsadjacenttothetractionofbuccalversuspalatalmaxillaryimpactedcanines AT heraldoluisdiasdasilveira rootandalveolarbonechangesinfirstpremolarsadjacenttothetractionofbuccalversuspalatalmaxillaryimpactedcanines AT luisernestoarriolaguillen rootandalveolarbonechangesinfirstpremolarsadjacenttothetractionofbuccalversuspalatalmaxillaryimpactedcanines |
_version_ |
1714817498059112448 |