Root and alveolar bone changes in first premolars adjacent to the traction of buccal versus palatal maxillary impacted canines.

OBJECTIVE:To compare the root and alveolar bone changes in first premolars adjacent to the orthodontic traction of buccal versus palatal maxillary impacted canines (MIC). MATERIALS AND METHODS:Before and after traction, cone beam tomographic computed (CBCTs) of 25 subjects with unilateral/bilateral...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yalil Augusto Rodríguez-Cárdenas, Gustavo Armando Ruíz-Mora, Aron Aliaga-Del Castillo, Heraldo Luis Dias-Da Silveira, Luis Ernesto Arriola-Guillén
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2019-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0226267
id doaj-aa3275cc029f4d15b53e17de39b21694
record_format Article
spelling doaj-aa3275cc029f4d15b53e17de39b216942021-03-03T21:20:29ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032019-01-011412e022626710.1371/journal.pone.0226267Root and alveolar bone changes in first premolars adjacent to the traction of buccal versus palatal maxillary impacted canines.Yalil Augusto Rodríguez-CárdenasGustavo Armando Ruíz-MoraAron Aliaga-Del CastilloHeraldo Luis Dias-Da SilveiraLuis Ernesto Arriola-GuillénOBJECTIVE:To compare the root and alveolar bone changes in first premolars adjacent to the orthodontic traction of buccal versus palatal maxillary impacted canines (MIC). MATERIALS AND METHODS:Before and after traction, cone beam tomographic computed (CBCTs) of 25 subjects with unilateral/bilateral MIC were included in this follow-up and retrospective study. Thirty-six first premolars were divided into 2 groups, buccal (n = 15) or palatal (n = 21) MIC, and the tomographic images were evaluated before and after orthodontic traction. Root changes in length and area were measured in sagittal, coronal and axial sections. Dimensions of alveolar bone were evaluated in coronal sections. Intergroup and intragroup comparisons were performed using t or Mann-Whitney U tests. Multiple linear regressions analyses were used to evaluate the influence of all predictor variables on root and alveolar bone changes (P<0.05). RESULTS:Root and alveolar bone changes produced by orthodontic traction were not significant between groups. Root changes were smaller than 1 mm (length) and 2.51 mm2 (area). Alveolar bone changes between buccal and palatal MIC groups ranged from 0.13 mm to 1.69 mm Furthermore, the multivariate analysis showed no significant influence of the impaction condition (buccal or palatal) on root change. Nevertheless, some different predictor variables of the MIC influence these changes. In the alveolar bone, the maximum upper alveolar width (MUAW) is the most affected by the traction of the MIC. CONCLUSIONS:Orthodontic traction of buccal vs palatal MIC produces similar resorptive and appositional root and alveolar bone changes in the adjacent first premolars, without clinical relevance.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0226267
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Yalil Augusto Rodríguez-Cárdenas
Gustavo Armando Ruíz-Mora
Aron Aliaga-Del Castillo
Heraldo Luis Dias-Da Silveira
Luis Ernesto Arriola-Guillén
spellingShingle Yalil Augusto Rodríguez-Cárdenas
Gustavo Armando Ruíz-Mora
Aron Aliaga-Del Castillo
Heraldo Luis Dias-Da Silveira
Luis Ernesto Arriola-Guillén
Root and alveolar bone changes in first premolars adjacent to the traction of buccal versus palatal maxillary impacted canines.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Yalil Augusto Rodríguez-Cárdenas
Gustavo Armando Ruíz-Mora
Aron Aliaga-Del Castillo
Heraldo Luis Dias-Da Silveira
Luis Ernesto Arriola-Guillén
author_sort Yalil Augusto Rodríguez-Cárdenas
title Root and alveolar bone changes in first premolars adjacent to the traction of buccal versus palatal maxillary impacted canines.
title_short Root and alveolar bone changes in first premolars adjacent to the traction of buccal versus palatal maxillary impacted canines.
title_full Root and alveolar bone changes in first premolars adjacent to the traction of buccal versus palatal maxillary impacted canines.
title_fullStr Root and alveolar bone changes in first premolars adjacent to the traction of buccal versus palatal maxillary impacted canines.
title_full_unstemmed Root and alveolar bone changes in first premolars adjacent to the traction of buccal versus palatal maxillary impacted canines.
title_sort root and alveolar bone changes in first premolars adjacent to the traction of buccal versus palatal maxillary impacted canines.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2019-01-01
description OBJECTIVE:To compare the root and alveolar bone changes in first premolars adjacent to the orthodontic traction of buccal versus palatal maxillary impacted canines (MIC). MATERIALS AND METHODS:Before and after traction, cone beam tomographic computed (CBCTs) of 25 subjects with unilateral/bilateral MIC were included in this follow-up and retrospective study. Thirty-six first premolars were divided into 2 groups, buccal (n = 15) or palatal (n = 21) MIC, and the tomographic images were evaluated before and after orthodontic traction. Root changes in length and area were measured in sagittal, coronal and axial sections. Dimensions of alveolar bone were evaluated in coronal sections. Intergroup and intragroup comparisons were performed using t or Mann-Whitney U tests. Multiple linear regressions analyses were used to evaluate the influence of all predictor variables on root and alveolar bone changes (P<0.05). RESULTS:Root and alveolar bone changes produced by orthodontic traction were not significant between groups. Root changes were smaller than 1 mm (length) and 2.51 mm2 (area). Alveolar bone changes between buccal and palatal MIC groups ranged from 0.13 mm to 1.69 mm Furthermore, the multivariate analysis showed no significant influence of the impaction condition (buccal or palatal) on root change. Nevertheless, some different predictor variables of the MIC influence these changes. In the alveolar bone, the maximum upper alveolar width (MUAW) is the most affected by the traction of the MIC. CONCLUSIONS:Orthodontic traction of buccal vs palatal MIC produces similar resorptive and appositional root and alveolar bone changes in the adjacent first premolars, without clinical relevance.
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0226267
work_keys_str_mv AT yalilaugustorodriguezcardenas rootandalveolarbonechangesinfirstpremolarsadjacenttothetractionofbuccalversuspalatalmaxillaryimpactedcanines
AT gustavoarmandoruizmora rootandalveolarbonechangesinfirstpremolarsadjacenttothetractionofbuccalversuspalatalmaxillaryimpactedcanines
AT aronaliagadelcastillo rootandalveolarbonechangesinfirstpremolarsadjacenttothetractionofbuccalversuspalatalmaxillaryimpactedcanines
AT heraldoluisdiasdasilveira rootandalveolarbonechangesinfirstpremolarsadjacenttothetractionofbuccalversuspalatalmaxillaryimpactedcanines
AT luisernestoarriolaguillen rootandalveolarbonechangesinfirstpremolarsadjacenttothetractionofbuccalversuspalatalmaxillaryimpactedcanines
_version_ 1714817498059112448