Exploring Community of Practice in Uganda’s Public Sector: Environmental Impact Assessment Case Study

The utilisation of typological concepts of participation-based research on the community of practice (CoP) examines Uganda’s public sector in relation to environmental impact assessment (EIA) of national projects. The re-assessment of participatory knowledge is analysed and incorporated in...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Giuseppe T. Cirella, Felix O. Iyalomhe, Anne Jensen, Oluwole O. Akiyode
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2018-07-01
Series:Sustainability
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/7/2502
id doaj-a9f50f7b71a444dc8fe680bb7f2ea833
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a9f50f7b71a444dc8fe680bb7f2ea8332020-11-25T01:54:12ZengMDPI AGSustainability2071-10502018-07-01107250210.3390/su10072502su10072502Exploring Community of Practice in Uganda’s Public Sector: Environmental Impact Assessment Case StudyGiuseppe T. Cirella0Felix O. Iyalomhe1Anne Jensen2Oluwole O. Akiyode3Transport Economics, Faculty of Economics, University of Gdansk, 81-824 Sopot, PolandPolo Centre of Sustainability, 18100 Imperia, ItalyDepartment of Environmental Sciences, Aarhus University, 4000 Copenhagen, DenmarkDepartment of Biological and Environmental Science, Kampala International University, Kampala, UgandaThe utilisation of typological concepts of participation-based research on the community of practice (CoP) examines Uganda’s public sector in relation to environmental impact assessment (EIA) of national projects. The re-assessment of participatory knowledge is analysed and incorporated into EIA project planning, design and implementation. A case study within the five divisions of the Kampala District used 250 semi-structured and open-ended survey questionnaires and 20 key informants by way of piecewise random sampling. The findings suggest that the majority of respondents were non-informed, on components of CoP, within the selected EIA projects. The CoP revealed concerns regarding Uganda’s security and corruption which intertwined on how the CoP was conducted. We provide original data on the CoP in relation to EIA projects with the intention of facilitating public sector entities a suitable level of knowledge in aiding affected communities.http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/7/2502community of practicestakeholder participationenvironmental impact assessmentUganda
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Giuseppe T. Cirella
Felix O. Iyalomhe
Anne Jensen
Oluwole O. Akiyode
spellingShingle Giuseppe T. Cirella
Felix O. Iyalomhe
Anne Jensen
Oluwole O. Akiyode
Exploring Community of Practice in Uganda’s Public Sector: Environmental Impact Assessment Case Study
Sustainability
community of practice
stakeholder participation
environmental impact assessment
Uganda
author_facet Giuseppe T. Cirella
Felix O. Iyalomhe
Anne Jensen
Oluwole O. Akiyode
author_sort Giuseppe T. Cirella
title Exploring Community of Practice in Uganda’s Public Sector: Environmental Impact Assessment Case Study
title_short Exploring Community of Practice in Uganda’s Public Sector: Environmental Impact Assessment Case Study
title_full Exploring Community of Practice in Uganda’s Public Sector: Environmental Impact Assessment Case Study
title_fullStr Exploring Community of Practice in Uganda’s Public Sector: Environmental Impact Assessment Case Study
title_full_unstemmed Exploring Community of Practice in Uganda’s Public Sector: Environmental Impact Assessment Case Study
title_sort exploring community of practice in uganda’s public sector: environmental impact assessment case study
publisher MDPI AG
series Sustainability
issn 2071-1050
publishDate 2018-07-01
description The utilisation of typological concepts of participation-based research on the community of practice (CoP) examines Uganda’s public sector in relation to environmental impact assessment (EIA) of national projects. The re-assessment of participatory knowledge is analysed and incorporated into EIA project planning, design and implementation. A case study within the five divisions of the Kampala District used 250 semi-structured and open-ended survey questionnaires and 20 key informants by way of piecewise random sampling. The findings suggest that the majority of respondents were non-informed, on components of CoP, within the selected EIA projects. The CoP revealed concerns regarding Uganda’s security and corruption which intertwined on how the CoP was conducted. We provide original data on the CoP in relation to EIA projects with the intention of facilitating public sector entities a suitable level of knowledge in aiding affected communities.
topic community of practice
stakeholder participation
environmental impact assessment
Uganda
url http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/7/2502
work_keys_str_mv AT giuseppetcirella exploringcommunityofpracticeinugandaspublicsectorenvironmentalimpactassessmentcasestudy
AT felixoiyalomhe exploringcommunityofpracticeinugandaspublicsectorenvironmentalimpactassessmentcasestudy
AT annejensen exploringcommunityofpracticeinugandaspublicsectorenvironmentalimpactassessmentcasestudy
AT oluwoleoakiyode exploringcommunityofpracticeinugandaspublicsectorenvironmentalimpactassessmentcasestudy
_version_ 1724988714634969088