Evaluation of the INECO Frontal Screening and the Frontal Assessment Battery in Peruvian patients with Alzheimer's disease and behavioral variant Frontotemporal dementia

Background: The physicians often confuse the early symptoms of Frontotemporal dementia (FTD) with Alzheimer dementia (AD), leading to misdiagnosis. There are some cognitive tests to discriminate between AD and behavioral variant FTD (bvFTD), and the INECO Frontal Screening (IFS) is a promising test...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nilton Custodio, Eder Herrera-Perez, David Lira, María Roca, Facundo Manes, Sandra Báez, Teresa Torralva
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2016-12-01
Series:eNeurologicalSci
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405650216300338
id doaj-a9ead6aecb9843288c56783fff5e46c4
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a9ead6aecb9843288c56783fff5e46c42020-11-24T21:18:21ZengElseviereNeurologicalSci2405-65022016-12-0152529Evaluation of the INECO Frontal Screening and the Frontal Assessment Battery in Peruvian patients with Alzheimer's disease and behavioral variant Frontotemporal dementiaNilton Custodio0Eder Herrera-Perez1David Lira2María Roca3Facundo Manes4Sandra Báez5Teresa Torralva6Unidad de Investigación, Instituto Peruano de Neurociencias, Lima, Perú; Unidad de Diagnóstico de Deterioro Cognitivo y Prevención de Demencia, Clínica Internacional, Lima, Perú; Corresponding author at: Unidad de Investigación, Instituto Peruano de Neurociencias, Bartolomé Herrera 161, Lince, Lima, Peru.Unidad de Investigación, Instituto Peruano de Neurociencias, Lima, Perú; Unidad de Desarrollo de Investigación, Tecnologías y Docencia, Instituto Nacional de Salud del Niño San Borja, Lima, PerúUnidad de Investigación, Instituto Peruano de Neurociencias, Lima, Perú; Unidad de Diagnóstico de Deterioro Cognitivo y Prevención de Demencia, Clínica Internacional, Lima, PerúNational Scientific and Technical Research Council (CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina; Institute of Cognitive and Translational Neuroscience (INCyT), INECO Foundation, Buenos Aires, Argentina; Institute of Neurosciences, Favaloro University, Buenos Aires, ArgentinaNational Scientific and Technical Research Council (CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina; Institute of Cognitive and Translational Neuroscience (INCyT), INECO Foundation, Buenos Aires, Argentina; Departamento de Psicología, Universidad de los Andes, Bogotá, Colombia; Institute of Neurosciences, Favaloro University, Buenos Aires, Argentina; Australian Research Council (ACR) Centre of Excellence in Cognition and its Disorders, AustraliaInstitute of Cognitive and Translational Neuroscience (INCyT), INECO Foundation, Buenos Aires, Argentina; Departamento de Psicología, Universidad de los Andes, Bogotá, ColombiaInstitute of Cognitive and Translational Neuroscience (INCyT), INECO Foundation, Buenos Aires, Argentina; Institute of Neurosciences, Favaloro University, Buenos Aires, Argentina; Australian Research Council (ACR) Centre of Excellence in Cognition and its Disorders, AustraliaBackground: The physicians often confuse the early symptoms of Frontotemporal dementia (FTD) with Alzheimer dementia (AD), leading to misdiagnosis. There are some cognitive tests to discriminate between AD and behavioral variant FTD (bvFTD), and the INECO Frontal Screening (IFS) is a promising test for this purpose. Objective: To assess the performance of the IFS to differentiate patients with AD from patients with bvFTD, compared with the Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB). Methods: A prospective study with 117 patients of our cognitive unit (35 case-patients with AD, 34 case-patients with bvFTD, and 48 control subjects). They were submitted to the following successive phases of evaluation: 1) screening; 2) dementia diagnosis; and 3) dementia sub-type diagnosis. The IFS and FAB were blind and independently applied by one neurologist to all the participants to end of phase 1 (screening), before to the definitive diagnosis establishment. Results: bvFTD showed a lower performance than AD patients on the IFS total score (F(1, 66) = 70.10, p < 0.01) and FAB total score (F(1, 66) = 17.91, p < 0.01). The IFS and FAB showed a sensitivity of 94.12% (95%CI = 80.3–99.2) and 82.3% (95%CI = 65.4–93.2), and a specificity of 94.2% (95%CI = 80.8–99.3) and 48.5% (95%CI = 31.3, 66.1), respectively. The IFS showed significantly superior discriminatory accuracy than the FAB (AuCIFS = 0.98; AuCFAB = 0.73, p < 0.00001). Conclusion: The IFS is useful for discriminating between AD and bvFTD patients. The performance of the IFS to differentiate patients with AD from patients with bvFTD is greater than FAB. Keywords: Frontotemporal dementia, Executive dysfunction, Neuropsychology, Predictive value of tests, Prospective studieshttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405650216300338
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Nilton Custodio
Eder Herrera-Perez
David Lira
María Roca
Facundo Manes
Sandra Báez
Teresa Torralva
spellingShingle Nilton Custodio
Eder Herrera-Perez
David Lira
María Roca
Facundo Manes
Sandra Báez
Teresa Torralva
Evaluation of the INECO Frontal Screening and the Frontal Assessment Battery in Peruvian patients with Alzheimer's disease and behavioral variant Frontotemporal dementia
eNeurologicalSci
author_facet Nilton Custodio
Eder Herrera-Perez
David Lira
María Roca
Facundo Manes
Sandra Báez
Teresa Torralva
author_sort Nilton Custodio
title Evaluation of the INECO Frontal Screening and the Frontal Assessment Battery in Peruvian patients with Alzheimer's disease and behavioral variant Frontotemporal dementia
title_short Evaluation of the INECO Frontal Screening and the Frontal Assessment Battery in Peruvian patients with Alzheimer's disease and behavioral variant Frontotemporal dementia
title_full Evaluation of the INECO Frontal Screening and the Frontal Assessment Battery in Peruvian patients with Alzheimer's disease and behavioral variant Frontotemporal dementia
title_fullStr Evaluation of the INECO Frontal Screening and the Frontal Assessment Battery in Peruvian patients with Alzheimer's disease and behavioral variant Frontotemporal dementia
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the INECO Frontal Screening and the Frontal Assessment Battery in Peruvian patients with Alzheimer's disease and behavioral variant Frontotemporal dementia
title_sort evaluation of the ineco frontal screening and the frontal assessment battery in peruvian patients with alzheimer's disease and behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia
publisher Elsevier
series eNeurologicalSci
issn 2405-6502
publishDate 2016-12-01
description Background: The physicians often confuse the early symptoms of Frontotemporal dementia (FTD) with Alzheimer dementia (AD), leading to misdiagnosis. There are some cognitive tests to discriminate between AD and behavioral variant FTD (bvFTD), and the INECO Frontal Screening (IFS) is a promising test for this purpose. Objective: To assess the performance of the IFS to differentiate patients with AD from patients with bvFTD, compared with the Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB). Methods: A prospective study with 117 patients of our cognitive unit (35 case-patients with AD, 34 case-patients with bvFTD, and 48 control subjects). They were submitted to the following successive phases of evaluation: 1) screening; 2) dementia diagnosis; and 3) dementia sub-type diagnosis. The IFS and FAB were blind and independently applied by one neurologist to all the participants to end of phase 1 (screening), before to the definitive diagnosis establishment. Results: bvFTD showed a lower performance than AD patients on the IFS total score (F(1, 66) = 70.10, p < 0.01) and FAB total score (F(1, 66) = 17.91, p < 0.01). The IFS and FAB showed a sensitivity of 94.12% (95%CI = 80.3–99.2) and 82.3% (95%CI = 65.4–93.2), and a specificity of 94.2% (95%CI = 80.8–99.3) and 48.5% (95%CI = 31.3, 66.1), respectively. The IFS showed significantly superior discriminatory accuracy than the FAB (AuCIFS = 0.98; AuCFAB = 0.73, p < 0.00001). Conclusion: The IFS is useful for discriminating between AD and bvFTD patients. The performance of the IFS to differentiate patients with AD from patients with bvFTD is greater than FAB. Keywords: Frontotemporal dementia, Executive dysfunction, Neuropsychology, Predictive value of tests, Prospective studies
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405650216300338
work_keys_str_mv AT niltoncustodio evaluationoftheinecofrontalscreeningandthefrontalassessmentbatteryinperuvianpatientswithalzheimersdiseaseandbehavioralvariantfrontotemporaldementia
AT ederherreraperez evaluationoftheinecofrontalscreeningandthefrontalassessmentbatteryinperuvianpatientswithalzheimersdiseaseandbehavioralvariantfrontotemporaldementia
AT davidlira evaluationoftheinecofrontalscreeningandthefrontalassessmentbatteryinperuvianpatientswithalzheimersdiseaseandbehavioralvariantfrontotemporaldementia
AT mariaroca evaluationoftheinecofrontalscreeningandthefrontalassessmentbatteryinperuvianpatientswithalzheimersdiseaseandbehavioralvariantfrontotemporaldementia
AT facundomanes evaluationoftheinecofrontalscreeningandthefrontalassessmentbatteryinperuvianpatientswithalzheimersdiseaseandbehavioralvariantfrontotemporaldementia
AT sandrabaez evaluationoftheinecofrontalscreeningandthefrontalassessmentbatteryinperuvianpatientswithalzheimersdiseaseandbehavioralvariantfrontotemporaldementia
AT teresatorralva evaluationoftheinecofrontalscreeningandthefrontalassessmentbatteryinperuvianpatientswithalzheimersdiseaseandbehavioralvariantfrontotemporaldementia
_version_ 1726009704610529280