Evaluation of the INECO Frontal Screening and the Frontal Assessment Battery in Peruvian patients with Alzheimer's disease and behavioral variant Frontotemporal dementia
Background: The physicians often confuse the early symptoms of Frontotemporal dementia (FTD) with Alzheimer dementia (AD), leading to misdiagnosis. There are some cognitive tests to discriminate between AD and behavioral variant FTD (bvFTD), and the INECO Frontal Screening (IFS) is a promising test...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier
2016-12-01
|
Series: | eNeurologicalSci |
Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405650216300338 |
id |
doaj-a9ead6aecb9843288c56783fff5e46c4 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-a9ead6aecb9843288c56783fff5e46c42020-11-24T21:18:21ZengElseviereNeurologicalSci2405-65022016-12-0152529Evaluation of the INECO Frontal Screening and the Frontal Assessment Battery in Peruvian patients with Alzheimer's disease and behavioral variant Frontotemporal dementiaNilton Custodio0Eder Herrera-Perez1David Lira2María Roca3Facundo Manes4Sandra Báez5Teresa Torralva6Unidad de Investigación, Instituto Peruano de Neurociencias, Lima, Perú; Unidad de Diagnóstico de Deterioro Cognitivo y Prevención de Demencia, Clínica Internacional, Lima, Perú; Corresponding author at: Unidad de Investigación, Instituto Peruano de Neurociencias, Bartolomé Herrera 161, Lince, Lima, Peru.Unidad de Investigación, Instituto Peruano de Neurociencias, Lima, Perú; Unidad de Desarrollo de Investigación, Tecnologías y Docencia, Instituto Nacional de Salud del Niño San Borja, Lima, PerúUnidad de Investigación, Instituto Peruano de Neurociencias, Lima, Perú; Unidad de Diagnóstico de Deterioro Cognitivo y Prevención de Demencia, Clínica Internacional, Lima, PerúNational Scientific and Technical Research Council (CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina; Institute of Cognitive and Translational Neuroscience (INCyT), INECO Foundation, Buenos Aires, Argentina; Institute of Neurosciences, Favaloro University, Buenos Aires, ArgentinaNational Scientific and Technical Research Council (CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina; Institute of Cognitive and Translational Neuroscience (INCyT), INECO Foundation, Buenos Aires, Argentina; Departamento de Psicología, Universidad de los Andes, Bogotá, Colombia; Institute of Neurosciences, Favaloro University, Buenos Aires, Argentina; Australian Research Council (ACR) Centre of Excellence in Cognition and its Disorders, AustraliaInstitute of Cognitive and Translational Neuroscience (INCyT), INECO Foundation, Buenos Aires, Argentina; Departamento de Psicología, Universidad de los Andes, Bogotá, ColombiaInstitute of Cognitive and Translational Neuroscience (INCyT), INECO Foundation, Buenos Aires, Argentina; Institute of Neurosciences, Favaloro University, Buenos Aires, Argentina; Australian Research Council (ACR) Centre of Excellence in Cognition and its Disorders, AustraliaBackground: The physicians often confuse the early symptoms of Frontotemporal dementia (FTD) with Alzheimer dementia (AD), leading to misdiagnosis. There are some cognitive tests to discriminate between AD and behavioral variant FTD (bvFTD), and the INECO Frontal Screening (IFS) is a promising test for this purpose. Objective: To assess the performance of the IFS to differentiate patients with AD from patients with bvFTD, compared with the Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB). Methods: A prospective study with 117 patients of our cognitive unit (35 case-patients with AD, 34 case-patients with bvFTD, and 48 control subjects). They were submitted to the following successive phases of evaluation: 1) screening; 2) dementia diagnosis; and 3) dementia sub-type diagnosis. The IFS and FAB were blind and independently applied by one neurologist to all the participants to end of phase 1 (screening), before to the definitive diagnosis establishment. Results: bvFTD showed a lower performance than AD patients on the IFS total score (F(1, 66) = 70.10, p < 0.01) and FAB total score (F(1, 66) = 17.91, p < 0.01). The IFS and FAB showed a sensitivity of 94.12% (95%CI = 80.3–99.2) and 82.3% (95%CI = 65.4–93.2), and a specificity of 94.2% (95%CI = 80.8–99.3) and 48.5% (95%CI = 31.3, 66.1), respectively. The IFS showed significantly superior discriminatory accuracy than the FAB (AuCIFS = 0.98; AuCFAB = 0.73, p < 0.00001). Conclusion: The IFS is useful for discriminating between AD and bvFTD patients. The performance of the IFS to differentiate patients with AD from patients with bvFTD is greater than FAB. Keywords: Frontotemporal dementia, Executive dysfunction, Neuropsychology, Predictive value of tests, Prospective studieshttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405650216300338 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Nilton Custodio Eder Herrera-Perez David Lira María Roca Facundo Manes Sandra Báez Teresa Torralva |
spellingShingle |
Nilton Custodio Eder Herrera-Perez David Lira María Roca Facundo Manes Sandra Báez Teresa Torralva Evaluation of the INECO Frontal Screening and the Frontal Assessment Battery in Peruvian patients with Alzheimer's disease and behavioral variant Frontotemporal dementia eNeurologicalSci |
author_facet |
Nilton Custodio Eder Herrera-Perez David Lira María Roca Facundo Manes Sandra Báez Teresa Torralva |
author_sort |
Nilton Custodio |
title |
Evaluation of the INECO Frontal Screening and the Frontal Assessment Battery in Peruvian patients with Alzheimer's disease and behavioral variant Frontotemporal dementia |
title_short |
Evaluation of the INECO Frontal Screening and the Frontal Assessment Battery in Peruvian patients with Alzheimer's disease and behavioral variant Frontotemporal dementia |
title_full |
Evaluation of the INECO Frontal Screening and the Frontal Assessment Battery in Peruvian patients with Alzheimer's disease and behavioral variant Frontotemporal dementia |
title_fullStr |
Evaluation of the INECO Frontal Screening and the Frontal Assessment Battery in Peruvian patients with Alzheimer's disease and behavioral variant Frontotemporal dementia |
title_full_unstemmed |
Evaluation of the INECO Frontal Screening and the Frontal Assessment Battery in Peruvian patients with Alzheimer's disease and behavioral variant Frontotemporal dementia |
title_sort |
evaluation of the ineco frontal screening and the frontal assessment battery in peruvian patients with alzheimer's disease and behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia |
publisher |
Elsevier |
series |
eNeurologicalSci |
issn |
2405-6502 |
publishDate |
2016-12-01 |
description |
Background: The physicians often confuse the early symptoms of Frontotemporal dementia (FTD) with Alzheimer dementia (AD), leading to misdiagnosis. There are some cognitive tests to discriminate between AD and behavioral variant FTD (bvFTD), and the INECO Frontal Screening (IFS) is a promising test for this purpose. Objective: To assess the performance of the IFS to differentiate patients with AD from patients with bvFTD, compared with the Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB). Methods: A prospective study with 117 patients of our cognitive unit (35 case-patients with AD, 34 case-patients with bvFTD, and 48 control subjects). They were submitted to the following successive phases of evaluation: 1) screening; 2) dementia diagnosis; and 3) dementia sub-type diagnosis. The IFS and FAB were blind and independently applied by one neurologist to all the participants to end of phase 1 (screening), before to the definitive diagnosis establishment. Results: bvFTD showed a lower performance than AD patients on the IFS total score (F(1, 66) = 70.10, p < 0.01) and FAB total score (F(1, 66) = 17.91, p < 0.01). The IFS and FAB showed a sensitivity of 94.12% (95%CI = 80.3–99.2) and 82.3% (95%CI = 65.4–93.2), and a specificity of 94.2% (95%CI = 80.8–99.3) and 48.5% (95%CI = 31.3, 66.1), respectively. The IFS showed significantly superior discriminatory accuracy than the FAB (AuCIFS = 0.98; AuCFAB = 0.73, p < 0.00001). Conclusion: The IFS is useful for discriminating between AD and bvFTD patients. The performance of the IFS to differentiate patients with AD from patients with bvFTD is greater than FAB. Keywords: Frontotemporal dementia, Executive dysfunction, Neuropsychology, Predictive value of tests, Prospective studies |
url |
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405650216300338 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT niltoncustodio evaluationoftheinecofrontalscreeningandthefrontalassessmentbatteryinperuvianpatientswithalzheimersdiseaseandbehavioralvariantfrontotemporaldementia AT ederherreraperez evaluationoftheinecofrontalscreeningandthefrontalassessmentbatteryinperuvianpatientswithalzheimersdiseaseandbehavioralvariantfrontotemporaldementia AT davidlira evaluationoftheinecofrontalscreeningandthefrontalassessmentbatteryinperuvianpatientswithalzheimersdiseaseandbehavioralvariantfrontotemporaldementia AT mariaroca evaluationoftheinecofrontalscreeningandthefrontalassessmentbatteryinperuvianpatientswithalzheimersdiseaseandbehavioralvariantfrontotemporaldementia AT facundomanes evaluationoftheinecofrontalscreeningandthefrontalassessmentbatteryinperuvianpatientswithalzheimersdiseaseandbehavioralvariantfrontotemporaldementia AT sandrabaez evaluationoftheinecofrontalscreeningandthefrontalassessmentbatteryinperuvianpatientswithalzheimersdiseaseandbehavioralvariantfrontotemporaldementia AT teresatorralva evaluationoftheinecofrontalscreeningandthefrontalassessmentbatteryinperuvianpatientswithalzheimersdiseaseandbehavioralvariantfrontotemporaldementia |
_version_ |
1726009704610529280 |