Comparison of the tree species select classification methods from aerial photo

This article describes a comparison of various programs for the automatic supervised classification used for identification of forest tree species representation from the aerial photographs. These programs were represented by American software Erdas Imagine 8.4, Czech products LuciaG 4.0 and TopoL D...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Martin Gabzdyl
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Mendel University Press 2008-01-01
Series:Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis
Subjects:
oak
Online Access:https://acta.mendelu.cz/56/5/0279/
id doaj-a9e29ad5cdd84695b3409325ce70fa9a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a9e29ad5cdd84695b3409325ce70fa9a2020-11-25T00:12:34ZengMendel University PressActa Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis1211-85162464-83102008-01-0156527929210.11118/actaun200856050279Comparison of the tree species select classification methods from aerial photoMartin Gabzdyl0Ústav pro hospodářskou úpravu lesů Brandýs nad Labem, pobočka Frýdek-Místek, Nádražní 2811, 738 25 Frýdek-Místek, Česká republikaThis article describes a comparison of various programs for the automatic supervised classification used for identification of forest tree species representation from the aerial photographs. These programs were represented by American software Erdas Imagine 8.4, Czech products LuciaG 4.0 and TopoL DMT 6.014. The study displays a minor production forest area with proportion of four most frequently occurring tree species – spruce, larch, oak and ash in the research area of the forest region around Bystřice pod Hostýnem, the Czech Republic. For the reason of lower quality of spectrozonal photographs it was necessary to use some corrections; such as highlighting pen techniques, namely Kernel Processor Low-Frequency and High-Frequency filters, belonging to space operations. Photographs, modified in this way, served for a construction of individual training sets, which were consequently used within individual classification methods of directed classification in each comparative software. Self-classification took place at the level of a particular tree species. Classification accuracy was determined by comparison of results and reference data from the terrain research.The outcome is, that the best classification for oak and ash was in combination with TopoL program, classification according to gravity centre and combination of solation + insolation signature of the treetop parts with an aggressive shade.On the contrary, for spruce and larch was the best classification in combination with software Erdas Imagine, classification roles of intervals mahalanobis with combination of solation signature of the treetop parts, along these tree edges with an aggressive shade.https://acta.mendelu.cz/56/5/0279/aerial photosupervised classificationspecies compositionsprucelarchoak
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Martin Gabzdyl
spellingShingle Martin Gabzdyl
Comparison of the tree species select classification methods from aerial photo
Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis
aerial photo
supervised classification
species composition
spruce
larch
oak
author_facet Martin Gabzdyl
author_sort Martin Gabzdyl
title Comparison of the tree species select classification methods from aerial photo
title_short Comparison of the tree species select classification methods from aerial photo
title_full Comparison of the tree species select classification methods from aerial photo
title_fullStr Comparison of the tree species select classification methods from aerial photo
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the tree species select classification methods from aerial photo
title_sort comparison of the tree species select classification methods from aerial photo
publisher Mendel University Press
series Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis
issn 1211-8516
2464-8310
publishDate 2008-01-01
description This article describes a comparison of various programs for the automatic supervised classification used for identification of forest tree species representation from the aerial photographs. These programs were represented by American software Erdas Imagine 8.4, Czech products LuciaG 4.0 and TopoL DMT 6.014. The study displays a minor production forest area with proportion of four most frequently occurring tree species – spruce, larch, oak and ash in the research area of the forest region around Bystřice pod Hostýnem, the Czech Republic. For the reason of lower quality of spectrozonal photographs it was necessary to use some corrections; such as highlighting pen techniques, namely Kernel Processor Low-Frequency and High-Frequency filters, belonging to space operations. Photographs, modified in this way, served for a construction of individual training sets, which were consequently used within individual classification methods of directed classification in each comparative software. Self-classification took place at the level of a particular tree species. Classification accuracy was determined by comparison of results and reference data from the terrain research.The outcome is, that the best classification for oak and ash was in combination with TopoL program, classification according to gravity centre and combination of solation + insolation signature of the treetop parts with an aggressive shade.On the contrary, for spruce and larch was the best classification in combination with software Erdas Imagine, classification roles of intervals mahalanobis with combination of solation signature of the treetop parts, along these tree edges with an aggressive shade.
topic aerial photo
supervised classification
species composition
spruce
larch
oak
url https://acta.mendelu.cz/56/5/0279/
work_keys_str_mv AT martingabzdyl comparisonofthetreespeciesselectclassificationmethodsfromaerialphoto
_version_ 1725398885669535744