Significance of BMI1 and FSCN1 expression in colorectal cancer

Background/Aims: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common type of cancer in terms of incidence and the fourth in cause of death world-wide, underscoring the need to identify novel biomarkers for early diagnosis, as well as improved disease stratification and treatment choices. Patients and M...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Nehad M Alajez
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2016-01-01
Series:The Saudi Journal of Gastroenterology
Subjects:
CRC
Online Access:http://www.saudijgastro.com/article.asp?issn=1319-3767;year=2016;volume=22;issue=4;spage=288;epage=293;aulast=Alajez
id doaj-a9d9333d93d94675ae56ba7d0b821ac0
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a9d9333d93d94675ae56ba7d0b821ac02020-11-24T21:26:34ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsThe Saudi Journal of Gastroenterology1319-37671998-40492016-01-0122428829310.4103/1319-3767.187602Significance of BMI1 and FSCN1 expression in colorectal cancerNehad M AlajezBackground/Aims: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common type of cancer in terms of incidence and the fourth in cause of death world-wide, underscoring the need to identify novel biomarkers for early diagnosis, as well as improved disease stratification and treatment choices. Patients and Methods: The Gene Expression Omnibus (GSE21510) and the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) CRC datasets were utilized in the current study. GeneSpring 13.0 was used for normalization and analysis. The log-rank test was used to compare the outcome between expression groups. Result: Significant upregulation of BMI1 (2.3 FC, P = 3.7 × 10-18) and FSCN1 (1.3 FC,P = 4.7 × 10-3) was observed in CRC. High BMI1 expression was associated with reduced overall survival (OS) [Hazard ratio (HR), 1.87; 95% CI. 1.17–3.03; P= 0.009] and reduced disease-free survival (DFS) [HR, 162; 95% CI 1.01–2.63;P = 0.045]. Similarly, high expression of FSCN1 was associated with reduced OS (HR, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.24–3.2; P= 0.0044) and reduced DFS (HR, 1.60; 95% CI, 0.99–2.57;P = 0.055). Importantly, BMI1high/FSCN1high patients experienced the worst OS (HR, 3.17; 95% CI, 1.77–6.15; P= 0.0002) and DFS (HR, 2.34; 95% CI, 1.27–4.67,P = 0.0078). Using pathway analyses, tumors overexpressing BMI1 were enriched in zinc finger proteins and genes involved in DNA binding and regulation of transcription, whereas tumors expressing FSCN1 were enriched in genes involved in cell migration. Conclusion: Our data revealed poor OS and DFS in CRC patients overexpressing BMI1 or FSCN1 and suggest that these two markers in combination may represent superior prognostic marker to either one. Targeting BMI1 and FSCN1 may also provide potential therapeutic opportunity in CRC.http://www.saudijgastro.com/article.asp?issn=1319-3767;year=2016;volume=22;issue=4;spage=288;epage=293;aulast=AlajezBMI1CRCFSCN1survival
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Nehad M Alajez
spellingShingle Nehad M Alajez
Significance of BMI1 and FSCN1 expression in colorectal cancer
The Saudi Journal of Gastroenterology
BMI1
CRC
FSCN1
survival
author_facet Nehad M Alajez
author_sort Nehad M Alajez
title Significance of BMI1 and FSCN1 expression in colorectal cancer
title_short Significance of BMI1 and FSCN1 expression in colorectal cancer
title_full Significance of BMI1 and FSCN1 expression in colorectal cancer
title_fullStr Significance of BMI1 and FSCN1 expression in colorectal cancer
title_full_unstemmed Significance of BMI1 and FSCN1 expression in colorectal cancer
title_sort significance of bmi1 and fscn1 expression in colorectal cancer
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series The Saudi Journal of Gastroenterology
issn 1319-3767
1998-4049
publishDate 2016-01-01
description Background/Aims: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common type of cancer in terms of incidence and the fourth in cause of death world-wide, underscoring the need to identify novel biomarkers for early diagnosis, as well as improved disease stratification and treatment choices. Patients and Methods: The Gene Expression Omnibus (GSE21510) and the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) CRC datasets were utilized in the current study. GeneSpring 13.0 was used for normalization and analysis. The log-rank test was used to compare the outcome between expression groups. Result: Significant upregulation of BMI1 (2.3 FC, P = 3.7 × 10-18) and FSCN1 (1.3 FC,P = 4.7 × 10-3) was observed in CRC. High BMI1 expression was associated with reduced overall survival (OS) [Hazard ratio (HR), 1.87; 95% CI. 1.17–3.03; P= 0.009] and reduced disease-free survival (DFS) [HR, 162; 95% CI 1.01–2.63;P = 0.045]. Similarly, high expression of FSCN1 was associated with reduced OS (HR, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.24–3.2; P= 0.0044) and reduced DFS (HR, 1.60; 95% CI, 0.99–2.57;P = 0.055). Importantly, BMI1high/FSCN1high patients experienced the worst OS (HR, 3.17; 95% CI, 1.77–6.15; P= 0.0002) and DFS (HR, 2.34; 95% CI, 1.27–4.67,P = 0.0078). Using pathway analyses, tumors overexpressing BMI1 were enriched in zinc finger proteins and genes involved in DNA binding and regulation of transcription, whereas tumors expressing FSCN1 were enriched in genes involved in cell migration. Conclusion: Our data revealed poor OS and DFS in CRC patients overexpressing BMI1 or FSCN1 and suggest that these two markers in combination may represent superior prognostic marker to either one. Targeting BMI1 and FSCN1 may also provide potential therapeutic opportunity in CRC.
topic BMI1
CRC
FSCN1
survival
url http://www.saudijgastro.com/article.asp?issn=1319-3767;year=2016;volume=22;issue=4;spage=288;epage=293;aulast=Alajez
work_keys_str_mv AT nehadmalajez significanceofbmi1andfscn1expressionincolorectalcancer
_version_ 1725978843065352192