Optical coherence tomography findings in unilateral peripheral cone dysfunction syndrome: a case report

• Main Authors: Tetsuya Hasegawa, Soichi Tetsuka, Aya Yamaguchi, Chieko Kobashi, Tomomi Sato, Yoshiaki Tanaka, Akihiro Kakehashi
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: BMC 2019-05-01
• Series: BMC Ophthalmology
• Subjects: Cone dystrophy; Ganglion cell complex; Swept-source optical coherence tomography; Peripheral cone dysfunction syndrome; Peripheral cone dystrophy
• Online Access: http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12886-019-1121-2

Abstract Introduction To report a case of unilateral peripheral cone dysfunction syndrome and evaluate the associated clinicopathological changes using swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT). Case presentation A 39-year-old Japanese woman reported a visual field defect of 2-years duration in the right eye. The patient underwent visual field testing, full-field electroretinography (ff-ERG), SS-OCT, and a routine ophthalmologic examination. The best-corrected visual acuity was 20/20 bilaterally. The funduscopy examination was normal bilaterally. Visual field testing showed a relative paracentral scotoma in the right eye. SS-OCT scans showed an unclear interdigitation zone (IZ) throughout the posterior pole except for the foveal zone in the right eye. SS-OCT macular analysis showed thinning of the ganglion cell layer (GCL) and inner plexiform layer (IPL) corresponding to the region of the IZ defect. ff-ERG showed almost normal flash ERGs and normal rod responses bilaterally. The cone response and flicker ERG response were decreased markedly only in the right eye. Conclusion To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case report of unilateral peripheral cone dysfunction syndrome in which SS-OCT showed pathological changes in the GCL and IPL. The OCT findings corresponded well to the ERG changes and visual field abnormality. Because foveolar cone photoreceptor cells are connected in a one-to-one correspondence to retinal ganglion cells without connection to the horizontal cells or amacrine cells, the GCL and IPL were not present in the fovea. Based on this analysis, we speculated that the primary lesion of peripheral cone dysfunction syndrome is not in the cone photoreceptor cells but in the horizontal cells and/or amacrine cells. The clinicopathological changes in the ganglion cells and cone photoreceptor cells might be the subsequent pathologies in the horizontal cells in peripheral cone dysfunction syndrome.