A Reply to Comment on Kluckow M. Barriers to the Implementation of Newborn Pulse Oximetry Screening: A Different Perspective. Int. J. Neonatal Screen. 2018, 4(1), 4
The commentary provided by Gentles et al. argues for the implementation of a universal pulse oximetry screening program, and I agree that, if it is possible, this is the optimum way to introduce this important health care measure for all of the reasons set out by the authors.[...]
Main Author: | Martin Kluckow |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2018-04-01
|
Series: | International Journal of Neonatal Screening |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.mdpi.com/2409-515X/4/2/14 |
Similar Items
-
Comment on Kluckow M. Barriers to the Implementation of Newborn Pulse Oximetry Screening: A Different Perspective. Int. J. Neonatal Screen. 2018, 4(1), 4
by: Thomas L. Gentles, et al.
Published: (2018-04-01) -
Barriers to the Implementation of Newborn Pulse Oximetry Screening: A Different Perspective
by: Martin Kluckow
Published: (2018-01-01) -
Newborn pulse oximetry screening for critical congenital heart defects
by: Sophie Jullien
Published: (2021-09-01) -
Pulse oximetry screening of neonates for congenital heart disease
by: N B Mathur, et al.
Published: (2017-01-01) -
Pulse oximetry screening: a review of diagnosing critical congenital heart disease in newborns
by: Engel MS, et al.
Published: (2016-07-01)