Oppositions and Their Member Nominations in the Conflict Communication Discourse of Artūras Paulauskas (2004)

The object of this article is the linguistic means of political conflict communication that are characteristic of the political discourse of the Acting President of Lithuania Artūras Paulauskas (2004). Conflict communication has become a research object of modern conflictology, which mainly focuses...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Vilma Linkevičiūtė
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Vilnius University Press 2013-02-01
Series:Verbum
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.journals.vu.lt/verbum/article/view/4984
id doaj-a9a7267f7aa445788599eb732e683f5f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a9a7267f7aa445788599eb732e683f5f2020-11-25T00:29:06ZdeuVilnius University PressVerbum2029-62232538-87462013-02-01410.15388/Verb.2013.4.4984Oppositions and Their Member Nominations in the Conflict Communication Discourse of Artūras Paulauskas (2004)Vilma LinkevičiūtėThe object of this article is the linguistic means of political conflict communication that are characteristic of the political discourse of the Acting President of Lithuania Artūras Paulauskas (2004). Conflict communication has become a research object of modern conflictology, which mainly focuses on interpersonal conflict and effective methods of managing conflict solutions. Political conflict communication, which is generally analysed on the basis of parliamentary debates, does not have a precise definition. Conflict communication can be defined as verbalizing conflict situations, which are conditioned by variances with set objectives or their means of implementation and by discrepancies between the interests and wishes of the sides involved in the conflict. In political communication, it is possible to talk about the fact that an initial situation of verbal and non-verbal actions can become a source of conflict, while disapproval of such a situation is verbalized in political communication. Any individual who wants to influence political events becomes the subject of such communication.http://www.journals.vu.lt/verbum/article/view/4984conflict communicationpolitical discoursedomainmeaning fieldconcept
collection DOAJ
language deu
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Vilma Linkevičiūtė
spellingShingle Vilma Linkevičiūtė
Oppositions and Their Member Nominations in the Conflict Communication Discourse of Artūras Paulauskas (2004)
Verbum
conflict communication
political discourse
domain
meaning field
concept
author_facet Vilma Linkevičiūtė
author_sort Vilma Linkevičiūtė
title Oppositions and Their Member Nominations in the Conflict Communication Discourse of Artūras Paulauskas (2004)
title_short Oppositions and Their Member Nominations in the Conflict Communication Discourse of Artūras Paulauskas (2004)
title_full Oppositions and Their Member Nominations in the Conflict Communication Discourse of Artūras Paulauskas (2004)
title_fullStr Oppositions and Their Member Nominations in the Conflict Communication Discourse of Artūras Paulauskas (2004)
title_full_unstemmed Oppositions and Their Member Nominations in the Conflict Communication Discourse of Artūras Paulauskas (2004)
title_sort oppositions and their member nominations in the conflict communication discourse of artūras paulauskas (2004)
publisher Vilnius University Press
series Verbum
issn 2029-6223
2538-8746
publishDate 2013-02-01
description The object of this article is the linguistic means of political conflict communication that are characteristic of the political discourse of the Acting President of Lithuania Artūras Paulauskas (2004). Conflict communication has become a research object of modern conflictology, which mainly focuses on interpersonal conflict and effective methods of managing conflict solutions. Political conflict communication, which is generally analysed on the basis of parliamentary debates, does not have a precise definition. Conflict communication can be defined as verbalizing conflict situations, which are conditioned by variances with set objectives or their means of implementation and by discrepancies between the interests and wishes of the sides involved in the conflict. In political communication, it is possible to talk about the fact that an initial situation of verbal and non-verbal actions can become a source of conflict, while disapproval of such a situation is verbalized in political communication. Any individual who wants to influence political events becomes the subject of such communication.
topic conflict communication
political discourse
domain
meaning field
concept
url http://www.journals.vu.lt/verbum/article/view/4984
work_keys_str_mv AT vilmalinkeviciute oppositionsandtheirmembernominationsintheconflictcommunicationdiscourseofarturaspaulauskas2004
_version_ 1725333311373443072