Comment on "Significance of "high probability/low damage" versus "low probability/high damage" flood events" by Merz et al. (2009)
This comment is meant to shed some light on the use of so-called "risk aversion functions" in the management of flood risks and other natural hazards as recently proposed in this journal (Merz et al., 2009). In particular, I resume the discussion as to whether the relative damage is a suit...
Main Author: | C. M. Rheinberger |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Copernicus Publications
2010-01-01
|
Series: | Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences |
Online Access: | http://www.nat-hazards-earth-syst-sci.net/10/1/2010/nhess-10-1-2010.pdf |
Similar Items
-
Reply to Comment on "Significance of "high probability/low damage" versus "low probability/high damage" flood events" by C. M. Rheinberger (2009)
by: B. Merz, et al.
Published: (2010-01-01) -
Significance of "high probability/low damage" versus "low probability/high damage" flood events
by: B. Merz, et al.
Published: (2009-06-01) -
Most probable cost of flood damage in residential areas in Mexico.
by: José Emilio Baró Suárez, et al.
Published: (2011-08-01) -
Storm-Induced Power Grid Damage Forecasting Method for Solving Low Probability Event Data
by: Seongmun Oh, et al.
Published: (2021-01-01) -
Variations in organisational and employee responses to high-impact, low-probability events
by: Riddle, Lorna Isabel
Published: (2015)