Complicity in democratic engagement with autocratic systems
Autocratic control of civil society, including academia, can be extended to democratic societies and institutions in ways that pose threats to liberal-democratic values, such as academic freedom, for example through mechanisms and practices that lead to academic self-censorship. Engaging critically...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Taylor & Francis Group
2021-07-01
|
Series: | Ethics & Global Politics |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/16544951.2021.1958509 |
id |
doaj-a9991999dc7446a1931e91892e5542e0 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-a9991999dc7446a1931e91892e5542e02021-09-06T14:06:25ZengTaylor & Francis GroupEthics & Global Politics1654-49511654-63692021-07-0114310.1080/16544951.2021.19585091958509Complicity in democratic engagement with autocratic systemsEva Pils0King's College LondonAutocratic control of civil society, including academia, can be extended to democratic societies and institutions in ways that pose threats to liberal-democratic values, such as academic freedom, for example through mechanisms and practices that lead to academic self-censorship. Engaging critically with the literature on ‘sharp power’ and ‘authoritarian influencing’ addressing this phenomenon, this paper argues that democratic actors who, without sharing the repressive goals of autocracies, contribute to their success in settings of international collaboration and exchange can become structurally complicit with such wrongs. Recognizing the risk of complicity is a necessary first step towards addressing the political responsibilities resulting from it.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/16544951.2021.1958509autocracydemocracyauthoritarian influencingsharp poweracademic freedomstructural injusticecomplicityresponsibilitychina |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Eva Pils |
spellingShingle |
Eva Pils Complicity in democratic engagement with autocratic systems Ethics & Global Politics autocracy democracy authoritarian influencing sharp power academic freedom structural injustice complicity responsibility china |
author_facet |
Eva Pils |
author_sort |
Eva Pils |
title |
Complicity in democratic engagement with autocratic systems |
title_short |
Complicity in democratic engagement with autocratic systems |
title_full |
Complicity in democratic engagement with autocratic systems |
title_fullStr |
Complicity in democratic engagement with autocratic systems |
title_full_unstemmed |
Complicity in democratic engagement with autocratic systems |
title_sort |
complicity in democratic engagement with autocratic systems |
publisher |
Taylor & Francis Group |
series |
Ethics & Global Politics |
issn |
1654-4951 1654-6369 |
publishDate |
2021-07-01 |
description |
Autocratic control of civil society, including academia, can be extended to democratic societies and institutions in ways that pose threats to liberal-democratic values, such as academic freedom, for example through mechanisms and practices that lead to academic self-censorship. Engaging critically with the literature on ‘sharp power’ and ‘authoritarian influencing’ addressing this phenomenon, this paper argues that democratic actors who, without sharing the repressive goals of autocracies, contribute to their success in settings of international collaboration and exchange can become structurally complicit with such wrongs. Recognizing the risk of complicity is a necessary first step towards addressing the political responsibilities resulting from it. |
topic |
autocracy democracy authoritarian influencing sharp power academic freedom structural injustice complicity responsibility china |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/16544951.2021.1958509 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT evapils complicityindemocraticengagementwithautocraticsystems |
_version_ |
1717779308334809088 |