The RAS-Effector Interface: Isoform-Specific Differences in the Effector Binding Regions.

RAS effectors specifically interact with the GTP-bound form of RAS in response to extracellular signals and link them to downstream signaling pathways. The molecular nature of effector interaction by RAS is well-studied but yet still incompletely understood in a comprehensive and systematic way. Her...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hossein Nakhaeizadeh, Ehsan Amin, Saeideh Nakhaei-Rad, Radovan Dvorsky, Mohammad Reza Ahmadian
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2016-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5147862?pdf=render
id doaj-a986aef647c84af98ef60d93d1bc7449
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a986aef647c84af98ef60d93d1bc74492020-11-25T01:36:42ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032016-01-011112e016714510.1371/journal.pone.0167145The RAS-Effector Interface: Isoform-Specific Differences in the Effector Binding Regions.Hossein NakhaeizadehEhsan AminSaeideh Nakhaei-RadRadovan DvorskyMohammad Reza AhmadianRAS effectors specifically interact with the GTP-bound form of RAS in response to extracellular signals and link them to downstream signaling pathways. The molecular nature of effector interaction by RAS is well-studied but yet still incompletely understood in a comprehensive and systematic way. Here, structure-function relationships in the interaction between different RAS proteins and various effectors were investigated in detail by combining our in vitro data with in silico data. Equilibrium dissociation constants were determined for the binding of HRAS, KRAS, NRAS, RRAS1 and RRAS2 to both the RAS binding (RB) domain of CRAF and PI3Kα, and the RAS association (RA) domain of RASSF5, RALGDS and PLCε, respectively, using fluorescence polarization. An interaction matrix, constructed on the basis of available crystal structures, allowed identification of hotspots as critical determinants for RAS-effector interaction. New insights provided by this study are the dissection of the identified hotspots in five distinct regions (R1 to R5) in spite of high sequence variability not only between, but also within, RB/RA domain-containing effectors proteins. Finally, we propose that intermolecular β-sheet interaction in R1 is a central recognition region while R3 may determine specific contacts of RAS versus RRAS isoforms with effectors.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5147862?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Hossein Nakhaeizadeh
Ehsan Amin
Saeideh Nakhaei-Rad
Radovan Dvorsky
Mohammad Reza Ahmadian
spellingShingle Hossein Nakhaeizadeh
Ehsan Amin
Saeideh Nakhaei-Rad
Radovan Dvorsky
Mohammad Reza Ahmadian
The RAS-Effector Interface: Isoform-Specific Differences in the Effector Binding Regions.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Hossein Nakhaeizadeh
Ehsan Amin
Saeideh Nakhaei-Rad
Radovan Dvorsky
Mohammad Reza Ahmadian
author_sort Hossein Nakhaeizadeh
title The RAS-Effector Interface: Isoform-Specific Differences in the Effector Binding Regions.
title_short The RAS-Effector Interface: Isoform-Specific Differences in the Effector Binding Regions.
title_full The RAS-Effector Interface: Isoform-Specific Differences in the Effector Binding Regions.
title_fullStr The RAS-Effector Interface: Isoform-Specific Differences in the Effector Binding Regions.
title_full_unstemmed The RAS-Effector Interface: Isoform-Specific Differences in the Effector Binding Regions.
title_sort ras-effector interface: isoform-specific differences in the effector binding regions.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2016-01-01
description RAS effectors specifically interact with the GTP-bound form of RAS in response to extracellular signals and link them to downstream signaling pathways. The molecular nature of effector interaction by RAS is well-studied but yet still incompletely understood in a comprehensive and systematic way. Here, structure-function relationships in the interaction between different RAS proteins and various effectors were investigated in detail by combining our in vitro data with in silico data. Equilibrium dissociation constants were determined for the binding of HRAS, KRAS, NRAS, RRAS1 and RRAS2 to both the RAS binding (RB) domain of CRAF and PI3Kα, and the RAS association (RA) domain of RASSF5, RALGDS and PLCε, respectively, using fluorescence polarization. An interaction matrix, constructed on the basis of available crystal structures, allowed identification of hotspots as critical determinants for RAS-effector interaction. New insights provided by this study are the dissection of the identified hotspots in five distinct regions (R1 to R5) in spite of high sequence variability not only between, but also within, RB/RA domain-containing effectors proteins. Finally, we propose that intermolecular β-sheet interaction in R1 is a central recognition region while R3 may determine specific contacts of RAS versus RRAS isoforms with effectors.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5147862?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT hosseinnakhaeizadeh theraseffectorinterfaceisoformspecificdifferencesintheeffectorbindingregions
AT ehsanamin theraseffectorinterfaceisoformspecificdifferencesintheeffectorbindingregions
AT saeidehnakhaeirad theraseffectorinterfaceisoformspecificdifferencesintheeffectorbindingregions
AT radovandvorsky theraseffectorinterfaceisoformspecificdifferencesintheeffectorbindingregions
AT mohammadrezaahmadian theraseffectorinterfaceisoformspecificdifferencesintheeffectorbindingregions
AT hosseinnakhaeizadeh raseffectorinterfaceisoformspecificdifferencesintheeffectorbindingregions
AT ehsanamin raseffectorinterfaceisoformspecificdifferencesintheeffectorbindingregions
AT saeidehnakhaeirad raseffectorinterfaceisoformspecificdifferencesintheeffectorbindingregions
AT radovandvorsky raseffectorinterfaceisoformspecificdifferencesintheeffectorbindingregions
AT mohammadrezaahmadian raseffectorinterfaceisoformspecificdifferencesintheeffectorbindingregions
_version_ 1725061490244845568