Prevalence and effects of gastro-oesophageal reflux during spirometry in subjects undergoing reflux assessment.

Variability during spirometry can persist despite control of technical and personal factors. We postulate spirometry induces gastro-oesophageal reflux (GOR), which may cause variability and affect results of spirometry. Fifty-eight (58) subjects undergoing GOR investigation with oesophageal manometr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jerry Zhou, Ming Teo, Vincent Ho, John D Brannan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2020-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229250
id doaj-a976232d94d043adb0e30648468a55dc
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a976232d94d043adb0e30648468a55dc2021-03-03T21:35:41ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032020-01-01152e022925010.1371/journal.pone.0229250Prevalence and effects of gastro-oesophageal reflux during spirometry in subjects undergoing reflux assessment.Jerry ZhouMing TeoVincent HoJohn D BrannanVariability during spirometry can persist despite control of technical and personal factors. We postulate spirometry induces gastro-oesophageal reflux (GOR), which may cause variability and affect results of spirometry. Fifty-eight (58) subjects undergoing GOR investigation with oesophageal manometry and 24hr pH monitoring were recruited. Oesophageal dysmotility and GOR were assessed as part of clinical care. Subjects performed 2 sets of spirometry separated by a 10-minute rest period. The assessment of GOR during spirometry procedure (defined by a lower oesophageal pH<4) started from the first set of spirometry and concluded when the second set of spirometry was completed. We calculated variability (%) of FEV1, FVC and PEFR within each set as well as changes over 10-minutes. Twenty-six subjects (45%) recorded GOR during assessment. Of these, 23 subjects recorded GOR during the 10-minute rest period. Four subjects had GOR recorded only during spirometry tests. We did not find variability of spirometry parameters between the groups with and without GOR during spirometry procedure. However, in subjects with GOR, we found small but significant reductions of PEFR (0.5L/s, 8%, p<0.001) and FEV1 (84 mL, 3%, p = 0.048) in the second set of spirometry compared to the first spirometry set. This pilot study demonstrates that GOR can occur during and following spirometry. Presence of GOR during spirometry in this patient population caused small decreases in PEFR and FEV1 when it is repeated 10-minutes later however not increase variability in a single series of measurements.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229250
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jerry Zhou
Ming Teo
Vincent Ho
John D Brannan
spellingShingle Jerry Zhou
Ming Teo
Vincent Ho
John D Brannan
Prevalence and effects of gastro-oesophageal reflux during spirometry in subjects undergoing reflux assessment.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Jerry Zhou
Ming Teo
Vincent Ho
John D Brannan
author_sort Jerry Zhou
title Prevalence and effects of gastro-oesophageal reflux during spirometry in subjects undergoing reflux assessment.
title_short Prevalence and effects of gastro-oesophageal reflux during spirometry in subjects undergoing reflux assessment.
title_full Prevalence and effects of gastro-oesophageal reflux during spirometry in subjects undergoing reflux assessment.
title_fullStr Prevalence and effects of gastro-oesophageal reflux during spirometry in subjects undergoing reflux assessment.
title_full_unstemmed Prevalence and effects of gastro-oesophageal reflux during spirometry in subjects undergoing reflux assessment.
title_sort prevalence and effects of gastro-oesophageal reflux during spirometry in subjects undergoing reflux assessment.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2020-01-01
description Variability during spirometry can persist despite control of technical and personal factors. We postulate spirometry induces gastro-oesophageal reflux (GOR), which may cause variability and affect results of spirometry. Fifty-eight (58) subjects undergoing GOR investigation with oesophageal manometry and 24hr pH monitoring were recruited. Oesophageal dysmotility and GOR were assessed as part of clinical care. Subjects performed 2 sets of spirometry separated by a 10-minute rest period. The assessment of GOR during spirometry procedure (defined by a lower oesophageal pH<4) started from the first set of spirometry and concluded when the second set of spirometry was completed. We calculated variability (%) of FEV1, FVC and PEFR within each set as well as changes over 10-minutes. Twenty-six subjects (45%) recorded GOR during assessment. Of these, 23 subjects recorded GOR during the 10-minute rest period. Four subjects had GOR recorded only during spirometry tests. We did not find variability of spirometry parameters between the groups with and without GOR during spirometry procedure. However, in subjects with GOR, we found small but significant reductions of PEFR (0.5L/s, 8%, p<0.001) and FEV1 (84 mL, 3%, p = 0.048) in the second set of spirometry compared to the first spirometry set. This pilot study demonstrates that GOR can occur during and following spirometry. Presence of GOR during spirometry in this patient population caused small decreases in PEFR and FEV1 when it is repeated 10-minutes later however not increase variability in a single series of measurements.
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229250
work_keys_str_mv AT jerryzhou prevalenceandeffectsofgastrooesophagealrefluxduringspirometryinsubjectsundergoingrefluxassessment
AT mingteo prevalenceandeffectsofgastrooesophagealrefluxduringspirometryinsubjectsundergoingrefluxassessment
AT vincentho prevalenceandeffectsofgastrooesophagealrefluxduringspirometryinsubjectsundergoingrefluxassessment
AT johndbrannan prevalenceandeffectsofgastrooesophagealrefluxduringspirometryinsubjectsundergoingrefluxassessment
_version_ 1714816168068382720