Pilot implementation of : A preconception health trial in South Africa

Objectives: This article describes the learnings from the pilot phase of the Healthy Life Trajectories Initiative, a preconception health trial for 18- to 25-year-old women in Soweto, South Africa. Methods: The study compares two arms focussed on either physical and mental health (intervention; deli...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: CE Draper, A Prioreschi, LJ Ware, S Lye, SA Norris
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2020-07-01
Series:SAGE Open Medicine
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/2050312120940542
id doaj-a9746e62d33a47edb16b69342c504f6b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a9746e62d33a47edb16b69342c504f6b2020-11-25T02:42:30ZengSAGE PublishingSAGE Open Medicine2050-31212020-07-01810.1177/2050312120940542Pilot implementation of : A preconception health trial in South AfricaCE Draper0A Prioreschi1LJ Ware2S Lye3SA Norris4South African Medical Research Council/Wits Developmental Pathways for Health Research Unit, Department of Paediatrics, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South AfricaSouth African Medical Research Council/Wits Developmental Pathways for Health Research Unit, Department of Paediatrics, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South AfricaSouth African Medical Research Council/Wits Developmental Pathways for Health Research Unit, Department of Paediatrics, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South AfricaDepartments of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Physiology and Medicine, University of Toronto, ON, CanadaSouth African Medical Research Council/Wits Developmental Pathways for Health Research Unit, Department of Paediatrics, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South AfricaObjectives: This article describes the learnings from the pilot phase of the Healthy Life Trajectories Initiative, a preconception health trial for 18- to 25-year-old women in Soweto, South Africa. Methods: The study compares two arms focussed on either physical and mental health (intervention; delivered by community health workers – ‘Health Helpers’) or standard of care plus (control; standard access to healthcare plus additional telephonic input on ‘life skills’; delivered by call centre assistants). These are collectively referred to as Bukhali . Data on the pilot implementation of the Bukhali trial (n = 1655) were collected from (1) weekly team meetings, (2) two focus groups (one with the intervention team Health Helpers, n = 7; one with intervention participants, n = 8) and one paired interview with control call centre assistants (n = 2), (3) notes from eight debrief sessions with Health Helpers and (4) quantitative trial monitoring data. Qualitative data were thematically analysed. Results: The findings clustered within three themes: (1) challenges for young women in Soweto, (2) priorities for young women in Soweto and (3) implementation challenges and perceptions of the intervention. Challenges were mostly related to tough socioeconomic circumstances and less prioritisation of living a healthier life. The priorities of employment and educational opportunities reflected the socioeconomic challenges, where health was not recognised as priority. The main challenge to participation and compliance with the trial was that young women in Soweto generally wanted a tangible and preferably financial and immediate benefit. Community peer sessions, despite being recommended by young women as part of the intervention development, were not successful. Many women also moved between multiple households within Soweto, which flagged concerns for a cluster trial and risk of contamination. Conclusion: Preconception health trials should consider socioeconomic challenges present in urban poor contexts. Learnings from the pilot phase significantly affected the design and implementation of the main Bukhali trial.https://doi.org/10.1177/2050312120940542
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author CE Draper
A Prioreschi
LJ Ware
S Lye
SA Norris
spellingShingle CE Draper
A Prioreschi
LJ Ware
S Lye
SA Norris
Pilot implementation of : A preconception health trial in South Africa
SAGE Open Medicine
author_facet CE Draper
A Prioreschi
LJ Ware
S Lye
SA Norris
author_sort CE Draper
title Pilot implementation of : A preconception health trial in South Africa
title_short Pilot implementation of : A preconception health trial in South Africa
title_full Pilot implementation of : A preconception health trial in South Africa
title_fullStr Pilot implementation of : A preconception health trial in South Africa
title_full_unstemmed Pilot implementation of : A preconception health trial in South Africa
title_sort pilot implementation of : a preconception health trial in south africa
publisher SAGE Publishing
series SAGE Open Medicine
issn 2050-3121
publishDate 2020-07-01
description Objectives: This article describes the learnings from the pilot phase of the Healthy Life Trajectories Initiative, a preconception health trial for 18- to 25-year-old women in Soweto, South Africa. Methods: The study compares two arms focussed on either physical and mental health (intervention; delivered by community health workers – ‘Health Helpers’) or standard of care plus (control; standard access to healthcare plus additional telephonic input on ‘life skills’; delivered by call centre assistants). These are collectively referred to as Bukhali . Data on the pilot implementation of the Bukhali trial (n = 1655) were collected from (1) weekly team meetings, (2) two focus groups (one with the intervention team Health Helpers, n = 7; one with intervention participants, n = 8) and one paired interview with control call centre assistants (n = 2), (3) notes from eight debrief sessions with Health Helpers and (4) quantitative trial monitoring data. Qualitative data were thematically analysed. Results: The findings clustered within three themes: (1) challenges for young women in Soweto, (2) priorities for young women in Soweto and (3) implementation challenges and perceptions of the intervention. Challenges were mostly related to tough socioeconomic circumstances and less prioritisation of living a healthier life. The priorities of employment and educational opportunities reflected the socioeconomic challenges, where health was not recognised as priority. The main challenge to participation and compliance with the trial was that young women in Soweto generally wanted a tangible and preferably financial and immediate benefit. Community peer sessions, despite being recommended by young women as part of the intervention development, were not successful. Many women also moved between multiple households within Soweto, which flagged concerns for a cluster trial and risk of contamination. Conclusion: Preconception health trials should consider socioeconomic challenges present in urban poor contexts. Learnings from the pilot phase significantly affected the design and implementation of the main Bukhali trial.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/2050312120940542
work_keys_str_mv AT cedraper pilotimplementationofapreconceptionhealthtrialinsouthafrica
AT aprioreschi pilotimplementationofapreconceptionhealthtrialinsouthafrica
AT ljware pilotimplementationofapreconceptionhealthtrialinsouthafrica
AT slye pilotimplementationofapreconceptionhealthtrialinsouthafrica
AT sanorris pilotimplementationofapreconceptionhealthtrialinsouthafrica
_version_ 1724773517645316096