Pilot implementation of : A preconception health trial in South Africa
Objectives: This article describes the learnings from the pilot phase of the Healthy Life Trajectories Initiative, a preconception health trial for 18- to 25-year-old women in Soweto, South Africa. Methods: The study compares two arms focussed on either physical and mental health (intervention; deli...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SAGE Publishing
2020-07-01
|
Series: | SAGE Open Medicine |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1177/2050312120940542 |
id |
doaj-a9746e62d33a47edb16b69342c504f6b |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-a9746e62d33a47edb16b69342c504f6b2020-11-25T02:42:30ZengSAGE PublishingSAGE Open Medicine2050-31212020-07-01810.1177/2050312120940542Pilot implementation of : A preconception health trial in South AfricaCE Draper0A Prioreschi1LJ Ware2S Lye3SA Norris4South African Medical Research Council/Wits Developmental Pathways for Health Research Unit, Department of Paediatrics, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South AfricaSouth African Medical Research Council/Wits Developmental Pathways for Health Research Unit, Department of Paediatrics, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South AfricaSouth African Medical Research Council/Wits Developmental Pathways for Health Research Unit, Department of Paediatrics, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South AfricaDepartments of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Physiology and Medicine, University of Toronto, ON, CanadaSouth African Medical Research Council/Wits Developmental Pathways for Health Research Unit, Department of Paediatrics, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South AfricaObjectives: This article describes the learnings from the pilot phase of the Healthy Life Trajectories Initiative, a preconception health trial for 18- to 25-year-old women in Soweto, South Africa. Methods: The study compares two arms focussed on either physical and mental health (intervention; delivered by community health workers – ‘Health Helpers’) or standard of care plus (control; standard access to healthcare plus additional telephonic input on ‘life skills’; delivered by call centre assistants). These are collectively referred to as Bukhali . Data on the pilot implementation of the Bukhali trial (n = 1655) were collected from (1) weekly team meetings, (2) two focus groups (one with the intervention team Health Helpers, n = 7; one with intervention participants, n = 8) and one paired interview with control call centre assistants (n = 2), (3) notes from eight debrief sessions with Health Helpers and (4) quantitative trial monitoring data. Qualitative data were thematically analysed. Results: The findings clustered within three themes: (1) challenges for young women in Soweto, (2) priorities for young women in Soweto and (3) implementation challenges and perceptions of the intervention. Challenges were mostly related to tough socioeconomic circumstances and less prioritisation of living a healthier life. The priorities of employment and educational opportunities reflected the socioeconomic challenges, where health was not recognised as priority. The main challenge to participation and compliance with the trial was that young women in Soweto generally wanted a tangible and preferably financial and immediate benefit. Community peer sessions, despite being recommended by young women as part of the intervention development, were not successful. Many women also moved between multiple households within Soweto, which flagged concerns for a cluster trial and risk of contamination. Conclusion: Preconception health trials should consider socioeconomic challenges present in urban poor contexts. Learnings from the pilot phase significantly affected the design and implementation of the main Bukhali trial.https://doi.org/10.1177/2050312120940542 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
CE Draper A Prioreschi LJ Ware S Lye SA Norris |
spellingShingle |
CE Draper A Prioreschi LJ Ware S Lye SA Norris Pilot implementation of : A preconception health trial in South Africa SAGE Open Medicine |
author_facet |
CE Draper A Prioreschi LJ Ware S Lye SA Norris |
author_sort |
CE Draper |
title |
Pilot implementation of : A preconception health trial in South Africa |
title_short |
Pilot implementation of : A preconception health trial in South Africa |
title_full |
Pilot implementation of : A preconception health trial in South Africa |
title_fullStr |
Pilot implementation of : A preconception health trial in South Africa |
title_full_unstemmed |
Pilot implementation of : A preconception health trial in South Africa |
title_sort |
pilot implementation of : a preconception health trial in south africa |
publisher |
SAGE Publishing |
series |
SAGE Open Medicine |
issn |
2050-3121 |
publishDate |
2020-07-01 |
description |
Objectives: This article describes the learnings from the pilot phase of the Healthy Life Trajectories Initiative, a preconception health trial for 18- to 25-year-old women in Soweto, South Africa. Methods: The study compares two arms focussed on either physical and mental health (intervention; delivered by community health workers – ‘Health Helpers’) or standard of care plus (control; standard access to healthcare plus additional telephonic input on ‘life skills’; delivered by call centre assistants). These are collectively referred to as Bukhali . Data on the pilot implementation of the Bukhali trial (n = 1655) were collected from (1) weekly team meetings, (2) two focus groups (one with the intervention team Health Helpers, n = 7; one with intervention participants, n = 8) and one paired interview with control call centre assistants (n = 2), (3) notes from eight debrief sessions with Health Helpers and (4) quantitative trial monitoring data. Qualitative data were thematically analysed. Results: The findings clustered within three themes: (1) challenges for young women in Soweto, (2) priorities for young women in Soweto and (3) implementation challenges and perceptions of the intervention. Challenges were mostly related to tough socioeconomic circumstances and less prioritisation of living a healthier life. The priorities of employment and educational opportunities reflected the socioeconomic challenges, where health was not recognised as priority. The main challenge to participation and compliance with the trial was that young women in Soweto generally wanted a tangible and preferably financial and immediate benefit. Community peer sessions, despite being recommended by young women as part of the intervention development, were not successful. Many women also moved between multiple households within Soweto, which flagged concerns for a cluster trial and risk of contamination. Conclusion: Preconception health trials should consider socioeconomic challenges present in urban poor contexts. Learnings from the pilot phase significantly affected the design and implementation of the main Bukhali trial. |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1177/2050312120940542 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT cedraper pilotimplementationofapreconceptionhealthtrialinsouthafrica AT aprioreschi pilotimplementationofapreconceptionhealthtrialinsouthafrica AT ljware pilotimplementationofapreconceptionhealthtrialinsouthafrica AT slye pilotimplementationofapreconceptionhealthtrialinsouthafrica AT sanorris pilotimplementationofapreconceptionhealthtrialinsouthafrica |
_version_ |
1724773517645316096 |