Solving the South China Sea Crisis: A Recommendation for Indonesia

The main purpose of this paper is to recommend to Indonesia to maintain its national interest of a unified ASEAN on the South China Sea disputes with four policy recommendations. The failure of the 2012 ASEAN Ministerial Meeting was observed as many analysts as the start of a crack in ASEAN as a reg...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Kevin Ramadhan Sandy
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Andalas Institute of International Studies 2015-03-01
Series:Andalas Journal of International Studies
Online Access:http://ajis.fisip.unand.ac.id/index.php/ajis/article/view/24
id doaj-a96f54ee682f4b539a3f4c8ab6531514
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a96f54ee682f4b539a3f4c8ab65315142020-11-24T22:18:41Zeng Andalas Institute of International StudiesAndalas Journal of International Studies2301-82082355-95002015-03-0131345010.25077/ajis.3.1.34-50.201423Solving the South China Sea Crisis: A Recommendation for IndonesiaKevin Ramadhan SandyThe main purpose of this paper is to recommend to Indonesia to maintain its national interest of a unified ASEAN on the South China Sea disputes with four policy recommendations. The failure of the 2012 ASEAN Ministerial Meeting was observed as many analysts as the start of a crack in ASEAN as a regional group. With Cambodia’s acting as China’s proxy in the meeting, ASEAN failed to address the issue and to put it in the Joint Communique, although Vietnam and Philippines have insisted the chair to do so. This event led to the rise of suspicions from ASEAN claimant states towards Cambodia and China’s intention. Furthermore, this becomes a proof that ASEAN could no longer be independent as a regional group as China has increased its economic leverage on Cambodia. At the same time, Philippines and Vietnam have increased their bilateral ties with the United States, hoping to increase their leverage and capability vis-à-vis China. Thus, ASEAN is in an unstable state with high possibility of it to be divided into two blocs with the South China Sea still unresolved. One of Indonesia’s main foreign policy interests is a unified, centralized and independent ASEAN as a regional bloc. President Yudhoyono and Foreign Minister Natalegawa reflected this by underscoring the importance of ASEAN and the need to resolve the dispute as soon as possible before further tension occurred. In this case, Indonesia should try to act as the mediator to solve this issue as a neutral player.http://ajis.fisip.unand.ac.id/index.php/ajis/article/view/24
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kevin Ramadhan Sandy
spellingShingle Kevin Ramadhan Sandy
Solving the South China Sea Crisis: A Recommendation for Indonesia
Andalas Journal of International Studies
author_facet Kevin Ramadhan Sandy
author_sort Kevin Ramadhan Sandy
title Solving the South China Sea Crisis: A Recommendation for Indonesia
title_short Solving the South China Sea Crisis: A Recommendation for Indonesia
title_full Solving the South China Sea Crisis: A Recommendation for Indonesia
title_fullStr Solving the South China Sea Crisis: A Recommendation for Indonesia
title_full_unstemmed Solving the South China Sea Crisis: A Recommendation for Indonesia
title_sort solving the south china sea crisis: a recommendation for indonesia
publisher Andalas Institute of International Studies
series Andalas Journal of International Studies
issn 2301-8208
2355-9500
publishDate 2015-03-01
description The main purpose of this paper is to recommend to Indonesia to maintain its national interest of a unified ASEAN on the South China Sea disputes with four policy recommendations. The failure of the 2012 ASEAN Ministerial Meeting was observed as many analysts as the start of a crack in ASEAN as a regional group. With Cambodia’s acting as China’s proxy in the meeting, ASEAN failed to address the issue and to put it in the Joint Communique, although Vietnam and Philippines have insisted the chair to do so. This event led to the rise of suspicions from ASEAN claimant states towards Cambodia and China’s intention. Furthermore, this becomes a proof that ASEAN could no longer be independent as a regional group as China has increased its economic leverage on Cambodia. At the same time, Philippines and Vietnam have increased their bilateral ties with the United States, hoping to increase their leverage and capability vis-à-vis China. Thus, ASEAN is in an unstable state with high possibility of it to be divided into two blocs with the South China Sea still unresolved. One of Indonesia’s main foreign policy interests is a unified, centralized and independent ASEAN as a regional bloc. President Yudhoyono and Foreign Minister Natalegawa reflected this by underscoring the importance of ASEAN and the need to resolve the dispute as soon as possible before further tension occurred. In this case, Indonesia should try to act as the mediator to solve this issue as a neutral player.
url http://ajis.fisip.unand.ac.id/index.php/ajis/article/view/24
work_keys_str_mv AT kevinramadhansandy solvingthesouthchinaseacrisisarecommendationforindonesia
_version_ 1725782228465614848