Healthcare Utilization and Costs after Receiving a Positive <i>BRCA1/2</i> Result from a Genomic Screening Program

Population genomic screening has been demonstrated to detect at-risk individuals who would not be clinically identified otherwise. However, there are concerns about the increased utilization of unnecessary services and the associated increase in costs. The objectives of this study are twofold: (1) d...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jing Hao, Dina Hassen, Kandamurugu Manickam, Michael F. Murray, Dustin N. Hartzel, Yirui Hu, Kunpeng Liu, Alanna Kulchak Rahm, Marc S. Williams, Amanda Lazzeri, Adam Buchanan, Amy Sturm, Susan R. Snyder
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-02-01
Series:Journal of Personalized Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4426/10/1/7
id doaj-a95de0c9255b468aa4b56c492efa9263
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a95de0c9255b468aa4b56c492efa92632020-11-25T01:40:00ZengMDPI AGJournal of Personalized Medicine2075-44262020-02-01101710.3390/jpm10010007jpm10010007Healthcare Utilization and Costs after Receiving a Positive <i>BRCA1/2</i> Result from a Genomic Screening ProgramJing Hao0Dina Hassen1Kandamurugu Manickam2Michael F. Murray3Dustin N. Hartzel4Yirui Hu5Kunpeng Liu6Alanna Kulchak Rahm7Marc S. Williams8Amanda Lazzeri9Adam Buchanan10Amy Sturm11Susan R. Snyder12Department of Population Health Sciences, Geisinger, Danville, PA 17822, USADepartment of Population Health Sciences, Geisinger, Danville, PA 17822, USADivision of Genetic and Genomic Medicine, Nationwide Children’s Hospital, Columbus, OH 43205, USADepartment of Genetics, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06510, USAPhenomic Analytics and Clinical Data Core, Geisinger, Danville, PA 17822, USADepartment of Population Health Sciences, Geisinger, Danville, PA 17822, USADepartment of Computer Science, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL 32816, USAGenomic Medicine Institute, Geisinger, Danville, PA 17822, USAGenomic Medicine Institute, Geisinger, Danville, PA 17822, USAGenomic Medicine Institute, Geisinger, Danville, PA 17822, USAGenomic Medicine Institute, Geisinger, Danville, PA 17822, USAGenomic Medicine Institute, Geisinger, Danville, PA 17822, USADepartment of Health Policy and Behavioral Science, School of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA 30302, USAPopulation genomic screening has been demonstrated to detect at-risk individuals who would not be clinically identified otherwise. However, there are concerns about the increased utilization of unnecessary services and the associated increase in costs. The objectives of this study are twofold: (1) determine whether there is a difference in healthcare utilization and costs following disclosure of a pathogenic/likely pathogenic (P/LP) <i>BRCA1/2</i> variant via a genomic screening program, and (2) measure the post-disclosure uptake of National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guideline-recommended risk management. We retrospectively reviewed electronic health record (EHR) and billing data from a female population of <i>BRCA1/2</i> P/LP variant carriers without a personal history of breast or ovarian cancer enrolled in Geisinger&#8217;s MyCode genomic screening program with at least a one-year post-disclosure observation period. We identified 59 women for the study cohort out of 50,726 MyCode participants. We found no statistically significant differences in inpatient and outpatient utilization and average total costs between one-year pre- and one-year post-disclosure periods ($18,821 vs. $19,359, <i>p</i> = 0.76). During the first year post-disclosure, 49.2% of women had a genetic counseling visit, 45.8% had a mammography and 32.2% had an MRI. The uptake of mastectomy and oophorectomy was 3.5% and 11.8%, respectively, and 5% of patients received chemoprevention.https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4426/10/1/7genomic screening<i>brca1/2</i>healthcare utilizationhealthcare costsuptake of risk management
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jing Hao
Dina Hassen
Kandamurugu Manickam
Michael F. Murray
Dustin N. Hartzel
Yirui Hu
Kunpeng Liu
Alanna Kulchak Rahm
Marc S. Williams
Amanda Lazzeri
Adam Buchanan
Amy Sturm
Susan R. Snyder
spellingShingle Jing Hao
Dina Hassen
Kandamurugu Manickam
Michael F. Murray
Dustin N. Hartzel
Yirui Hu
Kunpeng Liu
Alanna Kulchak Rahm
Marc S. Williams
Amanda Lazzeri
Adam Buchanan
Amy Sturm
Susan R. Snyder
Healthcare Utilization and Costs after Receiving a Positive <i>BRCA1/2</i> Result from a Genomic Screening Program
Journal of Personalized Medicine
genomic screening
<i>brca1/2</i>
healthcare utilization
healthcare costs
uptake of risk management
author_facet Jing Hao
Dina Hassen
Kandamurugu Manickam
Michael F. Murray
Dustin N. Hartzel
Yirui Hu
Kunpeng Liu
Alanna Kulchak Rahm
Marc S. Williams
Amanda Lazzeri
Adam Buchanan
Amy Sturm
Susan R. Snyder
author_sort Jing Hao
title Healthcare Utilization and Costs after Receiving a Positive <i>BRCA1/2</i> Result from a Genomic Screening Program
title_short Healthcare Utilization and Costs after Receiving a Positive <i>BRCA1/2</i> Result from a Genomic Screening Program
title_full Healthcare Utilization and Costs after Receiving a Positive <i>BRCA1/2</i> Result from a Genomic Screening Program
title_fullStr Healthcare Utilization and Costs after Receiving a Positive <i>BRCA1/2</i> Result from a Genomic Screening Program
title_full_unstemmed Healthcare Utilization and Costs after Receiving a Positive <i>BRCA1/2</i> Result from a Genomic Screening Program
title_sort healthcare utilization and costs after receiving a positive <i>brca1/2</i> result from a genomic screening program
publisher MDPI AG
series Journal of Personalized Medicine
issn 2075-4426
publishDate 2020-02-01
description Population genomic screening has been demonstrated to detect at-risk individuals who would not be clinically identified otherwise. However, there are concerns about the increased utilization of unnecessary services and the associated increase in costs. The objectives of this study are twofold: (1) determine whether there is a difference in healthcare utilization and costs following disclosure of a pathogenic/likely pathogenic (P/LP) <i>BRCA1/2</i> variant via a genomic screening program, and (2) measure the post-disclosure uptake of National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guideline-recommended risk management. We retrospectively reviewed electronic health record (EHR) and billing data from a female population of <i>BRCA1/2</i> P/LP variant carriers without a personal history of breast or ovarian cancer enrolled in Geisinger&#8217;s MyCode genomic screening program with at least a one-year post-disclosure observation period. We identified 59 women for the study cohort out of 50,726 MyCode participants. We found no statistically significant differences in inpatient and outpatient utilization and average total costs between one-year pre- and one-year post-disclosure periods ($18,821 vs. $19,359, <i>p</i> = 0.76). During the first year post-disclosure, 49.2% of women had a genetic counseling visit, 45.8% had a mammography and 32.2% had an MRI. The uptake of mastectomy and oophorectomy was 3.5% and 11.8%, respectively, and 5% of patients received chemoprevention.
topic genomic screening
<i>brca1/2</i>
healthcare utilization
healthcare costs
uptake of risk management
url https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4426/10/1/7
work_keys_str_mv AT jinghao healthcareutilizationandcostsafterreceivingapositiveibrca12iresultfromagenomicscreeningprogram
AT dinahassen healthcareutilizationandcostsafterreceivingapositiveibrca12iresultfromagenomicscreeningprogram
AT kandamurugumanickam healthcareutilizationandcostsafterreceivingapositiveibrca12iresultfromagenomicscreeningprogram
AT michaelfmurray healthcareutilizationandcostsafterreceivingapositiveibrca12iresultfromagenomicscreeningprogram
AT dustinnhartzel healthcareutilizationandcostsafterreceivingapositiveibrca12iresultfromagenomicscreeningprogram
AT yiruihu healthcareutilizationandcostsafterreceivingapositiveibrca12iresultfromagenomicscreeningprogram
AT kunpengliu healthcareutilizationandcostsafterreceivingapositiveibrca12iresultfromagenomicscreeningprogram
AT alannakulchakrahm healthcareutilizationandcostsafterreceivingapositiveibrca12iresultfromagenomicscreeningprogram
AT marcswilliams healthcareutilizationandcostsafterreceivingapositiveibrca12iresultfromagenomicscreeningprogram
AT amandalazzeri healthcareutilizationandcostsafterreceivingapositiveibrca12iresultfromagenomicscreeningprogram
AT adambuchanan healthcareutilizationandcostsafterreceivingapositiveibrca12iresultfromagenomicscreeningprogram
AT amysturm healthcareutilizationandcostsafterreceivingapositiveibrca12iresultfromagenomicscreeningprogram
AT susanrsnyder healthcareutilizationandcostsafterreceivingapositiveibrca12iresultfromagenomicscreeningprogram
_version_ 1725047803439218688