Does the IASP definition of pain need updating?
Abstract. The current IASP definition of pain has come under renewed criticisms recently. There is a new momentum for its revision as reflected by the fact that IASP has now a Presidential Task Force dedicated to look into whether there is enough warrant to update the definition. I critically review...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wolters Kluwer
2019-10-01
|
Series: | PAIN Reports |
Online Access: | http://journals.lww.com/painrpts/fulltext/10.1097/PR9.0000000000000777 |
id |
doaj-a950f9e3c22848bcbce80383d70ab279 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-a950f9e3c22848bcbce80383d70ab2792020-11-25T03:16:41ZengWolters KluwerPAIN Reports2471-25312019-10-0145e77710.1097/PR9.0000000000000777201910000-00008Does the IASP definition of pain need updating?Murat Aydede0Department of Philosophy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, CanadaAbstract. The current IASP definition of pain has come under renewed criticisms recently. There is a new momentum for its revision as reflected by the fact that IASP has now a Presidential Task Force dedicated to look into whether there is enough warrant to update the definition. I critically review all the major criticisms of the current definition in detail, and raise new difficulties rarely discussed before. I show that none of the major criticisms has enough warrant to force us to substantially revise the current definition. Combined with the discussion of the new difficulties, there is nonetheless a need to restate the definition using slightly different terminology that will make the original intent of the current definition clearer and more precise. A restatement of the definition is proposed and its potential is discussed in light of some empirical questions that remain.http://journals.lww.com/painrpts/fulltext/10.1097/PR9.0000000000000777 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Murat Aydede |
spellingShingle |
Murat Aydede Does the IASP definition of pain need updating? PAIN Reports |
author_facet |
Murat Aydede |
author_sort |
Murat Aydede |
title |
Does the IASP definition of pain need updating? |
title_short |
Does the IASP definition of pain need updating? |
title_full |
Does the IASP definition of pain need updating? |
title_fullStr |
Does the IASP definition of pain need updating? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Does the IASP definition of pain need updating? |
title_sort |
does the iasp definition of pain need updating? |
publisher |
Wolters Kluwer |
series |
PAIN Reports |
issn |
2471-2531 |
publishDate |
2019-10-01 |
description |
Abstract. The current IASP definition of pain has come under renewed criticisms recently. There is a new momentum for its revision as reflected by the fact that IASP has now a Presidential Task Force dedicated to look into whether there is enough warrant to update the definition. I critically review all the major criticisms of the current definition in detail, and raise new difficulties rarely discussed before. I show that none of the major criticisms has enough warrant to force us to substantially revise the current definition. Combined with the discussion of the new difficulties, there is nonetheless a need to restate the definition using slightly different terminology that will make the original intent of the current definition clearer and more precise. A restatement of the definition is proposed and its potential is discussed in light of some empirical questions that remain. |
url |
http://journals.lww.com/painrpts/fulltext/10.1097/PR9.0000000000000777 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT murataydede doestheiaspdefinitionofpainneedupdating |
_version_ |
1724634710343155712 |