Drying kinetics of technical specified rubber

This paper reports the study of crumb rubber drying in different experimental designs. It is important to understand the characteristics of crumb rubber drying in order to formulate a better drying strategy that could give higher energy efficiency. Four experiments were carried out with constant hea...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mei Xiang Ng, Thing Chai Tham, Sze Pheng Ong, Chung Lim Law
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: KeAi Communications Co., Ltd. 2015-05-01
Series:Information Processing in Agriculture
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214317315000165
id doaj-a94cabaea14948bc9b9e2cdd25fd3c8a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a94cabaea14948bc9b9e2cdd25fd3c8a2021-02-02T08:51:53ZengKeAi Communications Co., Ltd.Information Processing in Agriculture2214-31732015-05-0121647110.1016/j.inpa.2015.05.001Drying kinetics of technical specified rubberMei Xiang NgThing Chai ThamSze Pheng OngChung Lim LawThis paper reports the study of crumb rubber drying in different experimental designs. It is important to understand the characteristics of crumb rubber drying in order to formulate a better drying strategy that could give higher energy efficiency. Four experiments were carried out with constant heat at maximum 100 °C and a stainless steel container was used to hold the sample of crumb rubber under study. The surface temperature profile of the rubber was investigated using two types of drying methods, normal hot air drying and vacuum drying. It was found that when the sample was dried, external surface temperature for drying with hot air dryer was higher than vacuum dryer. The results showed the evolution of temperature profile was not in good agreement with the prediction which revealed that there was no temperature gradient within the drying samples. The energy consumption for vacuum drying was higher compared to hot air drying, where there was a difference of 0.7079 MJ/kg H2O evaporated for drying temperature at 100 °C. The best fit model generated from the experimental data was the modified Henderson and Pabis model and the highest effective diffusivity obtained was 5.243 × 10−9 m2/s heating by vacuum oven at 90 °C under zero atmospheric pressure.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214317315000165Crumb rubberDrying characteristicMathematical modeling
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mei Xiang Ng
Thing Chai Tham
Sze Pheng Ong
Chung Lim Law
spellingShingle Mei Xiang Ng
Thing Chai Tham
Sze Pheng Ong
Chung Lim Law
Drying kinetics of technical specified rubber
Information Processing in Agriculture
Crumb rubber
Drying characteristic
Mathematical modeling
author_facet Mei Xiang Ng
Thing Chai Tham
Sze Pheng Ong
Chung Lim Law
author_sort Mei Xiang Ng
title Drying kinetics of technical specified rubber
title_short Drying kinetics of technical specified rubber
title_full Drying kinetics of technical specified rubber
title_fullStr Drying kinetics of technical specified rubber
title_full_unstemmed Drying kinetics of technical specified rubber
title_sort drying kinetics of technical specified rubber
publisher KeAi Communications Co., Ltd.
series Information Processing in Agriculture
issn 2214-3173
publishDate 2015-05-01
description This paper reports the study of crumb rubber drying in different experimental designs. It is important to understand the characteristics of crumb rubber drying in order to formulate a better drying strategy that could give higher energy efficiency. Four experiments were carried out with constant heat at maximum 100 °C and a stainless steel container was used to hold the sample of crumb rubber under study. The surface temperature profile of the rubber was investigated using two types of drying methods, normal hot air drying and vacuum drying. It was found that when the sample was dried, external surface temperature for drying with hot air dryer was higher than vacuum dryer. The results showed the evolution of temperature profile was not in good agreement with the prediction which revealed that there was no temperature gradient within the drying samples. The energy consumption for vacuum drying was higher compared to hot air drying, where there was a difference of 0.7079 MJ/kg H2O evaporated for drying temperature at 100 °C. The best fit model generated from the experimental data was the modified Henderson and Pabis model and the highest effective diffusivity obtained was 5.243 × 10−9 m2/s heating by vacuum oven at 90 °C under zero atmospheric pressure.
topic Crumb rubber
Drying characteristic
Mathematical modeling
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214317315000165
work_keys_str_mv AT meixiangng dryingkineticsoftechnicalspecifiedrubber
AT thingchaitham dryingkineticsoftechnicalspecifiedrubber
AT szephengong dryingkineticsoftechnicalspecifiedrubber
AT chunglimlaw dryingkineticsoftechnicalspecifiedrubber
_version_ 1724296136931409920