Editorial: The publication of geoscientific model developments v1.2
<p>Version 1.1 of the editorial of <i>Geoscientific Model Development</i> (GMD), published in 2015 <span class="cit" id="xref_paren.1">(<a href="#bib1.bibx6">GMD Executive Editors</a>, <a href="#bib1.bibx6">2015</a&...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Copernicus Publications
2019-06-01
|
Series: | Geoscientific Model Development |
Online Access: | https://www.geosci-model-dev.net/12/2215/2019/gmd-12-2215-2019.pdf |
id |
doaj-a93d6b75bb184b9f9eec675c1dda8570 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-a93d6b75bb184b9f9eec675c1dda85702020-11-24T21:40:22ZengCopernicus PublicationsGeoscientific Model Development1991-959X1991-96032019-06-01122215222510.5194/gmd-12-2215-2019Editorial: The publication of geoscientific model developments v1.2GMD executive editors<p>Version 1.1 of the editorial of <i>Geoscientific Model Development</i> (GMD), published in 2015 <span class="cit" id="xref_paren.1">(<a href="#bib1.bibx6">GMD Executive Editors</a>, <a href="#bib1.bibx6">2015</a>)</span>, introduced clarifications to the policy on publication of source code and input data for papers published in the journal. Three years of working with this policy has revealed that it is necessary to be more precise in the requirements of the policy and in the narrowness of its exceptions. Furthermore, the previous policy was not specific in the requirements for suitable archival locations. Best practice in code and data archiving continues to develop and is far from universal among scientists. This has resulted in many manuscripts requiring improvement in code and data availability practice during the peer-review process. New researchers continually start their professional lives, and it remains the case that not all authors fully appreciate why code and data publication is necessary. This editorial provides an opportunity to explain this in the context of GMD.</p> <p>The changes in the code and data policy are summarised as follows: </p><ul><li> <p id="d1e86">The requirement for authors to publish source code, unless this is impossible for reasons beyond their control, is clarified. The minimum requirements are strengthened such that all model code must be made accessible during the review process to the editor and to potentially anonymous reviewers. Source code that can be made public must be made public, and embargoes are not permitted. Identical requirements exist for input data and model evaluation data sets in the model experiment descriptions.</p></li><li> <p id="d1e90">The scope of the code and data required to be published is described. In accordance with Copernicus' own data policy, we now specifically strongly encourage all code and data used in any analyses be made available. This will have particular relevance for some model evaluation papers where editors may now strongly request this material be made available.</p></li><li> <p id="d1e94">The requirements of suitable archival locations are specified, along with the recommendation that Zenodo is often a good choice.</p></li></ul><p> In addition, since the last editorial, an “Author contributions” section must now be included in all manuscripts.</p>https://www.geosci-model-dev.net/12/2215/2019/gmd-12-2215-2019.pdf |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
GMD executive editors |
spellingShingle |
GMD executive editors Editorial: The publication of geoscientific model developments v1.2 Geoscientific Model Development |
author_facet |
GMD executive editors |
author_sort |
GMD executive editors |
title |
Editorial: The publication of geoscientific model developments v1.2 |
title_short |
Editorial: The publication of geoscientific model developments v1.2 |
title_full |
Editorial: The publication of geoscientific model developments v1.2 |
title_fullStr |
Editorial: The publication of geoscientific model developments v1.2 |
title_full_unstemmed |
Editorial: The publication of geoscientific model developments v1.2 |
title_sort |
editorial: the publication of geoscientific model developments v1.2 |
publisher |
Copernicus Publications |
series |
Geoscientific Model Development |
issn |
1991-959X 1991-9603 |
publishDate |
2019-06-01 |
description |
<p>Version 1.1 of the editorial of <i>Geoscientific Model Development</i> (GMD),
published in 2015 <span class="cit" id="xref_paren.1">(<a href="#bib1.bibx6">GMD Executive Editors</a>, <a href="#bib1.bibx6">2015</a>)</span>, introduced clarifications to the policy on publication
of source code and input data for papers published in the journal. Three
years of working with this policy has revealed that it is necessary
to be more precise in the requirements of the policy and in the narrowness of
its exceptions. Furthermore, the previous policy was not specific in the
requirements for suitable archival locations. Best practice in code and
data archiving continues to develop and is far from universal among scientists. This has
resulted in many manuscripts requiring improvement in code
and data availability practice during the peer-review process. New
researchers continually start their professional lives, and it remains the case
that not all authors fully appreciate why code and data publication
is necessary. This editorial provides an opportunity to explain this in the context of GMD.</p>
<p>The changes in the code and data policy are summarised as follows:
</p><ul><li>
<p id="d1e86">The requirement for authors to publish source code, unless this
is impossible for reasons beyond their control, is clarified. The
minimum requirements are strengthened such that all model code must
be made accessible during the review process to the editor and to
potentially anonymous reviewers. Source code that can be made public
must be made public, and embargoes are not permitted. Identical
requirements exist for input data and model evaluation data sets in
the model experiment descriptions.</p></li><li>
<p id="d1e90">The scope of the code and data required to be published is
described. In accordance with Copernicus' own data policy, we now
specifically strongly encourage all code and data used in any
analyses be made available. This will have particular relevance
for some model evaluation papers where editors may now strongly
request this material be made available.</p></li><li>
<p id="d1e94">The requirements of suitable archival locations are specified, along
with the recommendation that Zenodo is often a good choice.</p></li></ul><p>
In addition, since the last editorial, an “Author contributions”
section must now be included in all manuscripts.</p> |
url |
https://www.geosci-model-dev.net/12/2215/2019/gmd-12-2215-2019.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT gmdexecutiveeditors editorialthepublicationofgeoscientificmodeldevelopmentsv12 |
_version_ |
1725926296538578944 |