Are researchers moving away from animal models as a result of poor clinical translation in the field of stroke? An analysis of opinion papers

ObjectivesDespite decades of research using animals to develop pharmaceutical treatments for patients who had a stroke, few therapeutic options exist. The vast majority of interventions successful in preclinical animal studies have turned out to have no efficacy in humans or to be harmful to humans....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Pandora Pound, Rebecca Ram
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMJ Publishing Group 2020-11-01
Series:BMJ Open Science
Online Access:https://openscience.bmj.com/content/4/1/e100041.full
id doaj-a93805f75d18478da10ccf7670f757e3
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a93805f75d18478da10ccf7670f757e32021-01-22T08:00:04ZengBMJ Publishing GroupBMJ Open Science2398-87032020-11-014110.1136/bmjos-2019-100041Are researchers moving away from animal models as a result of poor clinical translation in the field of stroke? An analysis of opinion papersPandora Pound0Rebecca Ram1Safer Medicines Trust, Kingsbridge, UKSafer Medicines Trust, Kingsbridge, UKObjectivesDespite decades of research using animals to develop pharmaceutical treatments for patients who had a stroke, few therapeutic options exist. The vast majority of interventions successful in preclinical animal studies have turned out to have no efficacy in humans or to be harmful to humans. In view of this, we explore whether there is evidence of a move away from animal models in this field.MethodsWe used an innovative methodology, the analysis of opinion papers. Although we took a systematic approach to literature searching and data extraction, this is not a systematic review because the study involves the synthesis of opinions, not research evidence. Data were extracted from retrieved papers in chronological order and analysed qualitatively and descriptively.ResultsEighty eligible papers, published between 1979 and 2018, were identified. Most authors were from academic departments of neurology, neuroscience or stroke research. Authors agreed that translational stroke research was in crisis. They held diverse views about the causes of this crisis, most of which did not fundamentally challenge the use of animal models. Some, however, attributed the translational crisis to animal–human species differences and one to a lack of human in vitro models. Most of the proposed solutions involved fine-tuning animal models, but authors disagreed about whether such modifications would improve translation. A minority suggested using human in vitro methods alongside animal models. One proposed focusing only on human in vitro methods.ConclusionDespite recognising that animal models have been unsuccessful in the field of stroke, most researchers exhibited a strong resistance to relinquishing them. Nevertheless, there is an emerging challenge to the use of animal models, in the form of human-focused in vitro approaches. For the sake of stroke patients there is an urgent need to revitalise translational stroke research and explore the evidence for these new approaches.https://openscience.bmj.com/content/4/1/e100041.full
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Pandora Pound
Rebecca Ram
spellingShingle Pandora Pound
Rebecca Ram
Are researchers moving away from animal models as a result of poor clinical translation in the field of stroke? An analysis of opinion papers
BMJ Open Science
author_facet Pandora Pound
Rebecca Ram
author_sort Pandora Pound
title Are researchers moving away from animal models as a result of poor clinical translation in the field of stroke? An analysis of opinion papers
title_short Are researchers moving away from animal models as a result of poor clinical translation in the field of stroke? An analysis of opinion papers
title_full Are researchers moving away from animal models as a result of poor clinical translation in the field of stroke? An analysis of opinion papers
title_fullStr Are researchers moving away from animal models as a result of poor clinical translation in the field of stroke? An analysis of opinion papers
title_full_unstemmed Are researchers moving away from animal models as a result of poor clinical translation in the field of stroke? An analysis of opinion papers
title_sort are researchers moving away from animal models as a result of poor clinical translation in the field of stroke? an analysis of opinion papers
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
series BMJ Open Science
issn 2398-8703
publishDate 2020-11-01
description ObjectivesDespite decades of research using animals to develop pharmaceutical treatments for patients who had a stroke, few therapeutic options exist. The vast majority of interventions successful in preclinical animal studies have turned out to have no efficacy in humans or to be harmful to humans. In view of this, we explore whether there is evidence of a move away from animal models in this field.MethodsWe used an innovative methodology, the analysis of opinion papers. Although we took a systematic approach to literature searching and data extraction, this is not a systematic review because the study involves the synthesis of opinions, not research evidence. Data were extracted from retrieved papers in chronological order and analysed qualitatively and descriptively.ResultsEighty eligible papers, published between 1979 and 2018, were identified. Most authors were from academic departments of neurology, neuroscience or stroke research. Authors agreed that translational stroke research was in crisis. They held diverse views about the causes of this crisis, most of which did not fundamentally challenge the use of animal models. Some, however, attributed the translational crisis to animal–human species differences and one to a lack of human in vitro models. Most of the proposed solutions involved fine-tuning animal models, but authors disagreed about whether such modifications would improve translation. A minority suggested using human in vitro methods alongside animal models. One proposed focusing only on human in vitro methods.ConclusionDespite recognising that animal models have been unsuccessful in the field of stroke, most researchers exhibited a strong resistance to relinquishing them. Nevertheless, there is an emerging challenge to the use of animal models, in the form of human-focused in vitro approaches. For the sake of stroke patients there is an urgent need to revitalise translational stroke research and explore the evidence for these new approaches.
url https://openscience.bmj.com/content/4/1/e100041.full
work_keys_str_mv AT pandorapound areresearchersmovingawayfromanimalmodelsasaresultofpoorclinicaltranslationinthefieldofstrokeananalysisofopinionpapers
AT rebeccaram areresearchersmovingawayfromanimalmodelsasaresultofpoorclinicaltranslationinthefieldofstrokeananalysisofopinionpapers
_version_ 1724328465072652288