Depth of acid penetration and enamel surface roughness associated with different methods of interproximal enamel reduction.

OBJECTIVES:To assess and compare the enamel surface quality after interproximal enamel reduction (IPR) was performed with different systems and to study the relation between acid penetration depth and enamel surface quality as well as the importance of remineralization. METHODS:Sixty-five extracted...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gholamreza Danesh, Pascal Kai Konstantin Podstawa, Cate-Emilia Schwartz, Christian Kirschneck, Mozhgan Bizhang, Wolfgang H Arnold
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2020-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229595
id doaj-a935568d81ef4426b66685811ce1399c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a935568d81ef4426b66685811ce1399c2021-03-03T21:37:13ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032020-01-01153e022959510.1371/journal.pone.0229595Depth of acid penetration and enamel surface roughness associated with different methods of interproximal enamel reduction.Gholamreza DaneshPascal Kai Konstantin PodstawaCate-Emilia SchwartzChristian KirschneckMozhgan BizhangWolfgang H ArnoldOBJECTIVES:To assess and compare the enamel surface quality after interproximal enamel reduction (IPR) was performed with different systems and to study the relation between acid penetration depth and enamel surface quality as well as the importance of remineralization. METHODS:Sixty-five extracted teeth were randomly allocated to five experimental groups: untreated control, manual with New Metal Strips, mechanical with oscillating segment (OS) discs, Safe-Tipped Bur Kit, and the Ortho-Strip, followed by 30 s of polishing with the Softflex system and the Compo-system after treating the tooth with OS discs. Mesial surfaces were demineralized for 24 h and distal surfaces were subjected to interchanging demineralization and remineralization cycles of 24 h each for 18 days. The analysis was carried out by profilometry, scanning electron microscopy, and polarization microscopy. RESULTS:After IPR and polishing, enamel roughness was reduced for all systems tested except for the Essix Safe-Tipped Bur Kit. Subsequent demineralization increased enamel roughness in all groups except controls beyond the original level prior to IPR except for IPR with New Metal Strips or Ortho-Strips and subsequent polishing. Cyclic demineralization and remineralization for 18 days yielded a reduction in acid penetration depth and an increase in surface smoothness, which correlated with each other only for controls and treatment with New Metal Strips or Ortho-Strips. CONCLUSIONS:Manual IPR, using New Metal Strips and, even more, the oscillating IPR system Ortho-Strips, yielded smoother interproximal enamel surfaces and less acid penetration depth than the IPR systems with OS discs and the Safe-Tipped Bur Kit after polishing and 18 days of cyclic demineralization and remineralization. Irrespective of the IPR procedure, proper remineralization of IPR-treated surfaces is advisable to reduce caries susceptibility.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229595
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Gholamreza Danesh
Pascal Kai Konstantin Podstawa
Cate-Emilia Schwartz
Christian Kirschneck
Mozhgan Bizhang
Wolfgang H Arnold
spellingShingle Gholamreza Danesh
Pascal Kai Konstantin Podstawa
Cate-Emilia Schwartz
Christian Kirschneck
Mozhgan Bizhang
Wolfgang H Arnold
Depth of acid penetration and enamel surface roughness associated with different methods of interproximal enamel reduction.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Gholamreza Danesh
Pascal Kai Konstantin Podstawa
Cate-Emilia Schwartz
Christian Kirschneck
Mozhgan Bizhang
Wolfgang H Arnold
author_sort Gholamreza Danesh
title Depth of acid penetration and enamel surface roughness associated with different methods of interproximal enamel reduction.
title_short Depth of acid penetration and enamel surface roughness associated with different methods of interproximal enamel reduction.
title_full Depth of acid penetration and enamel surface roughness associated with different methods of interproximal enamel reduction.
title_fullStr Depth of acid penetration and enamel surface roughness associated with different methods of interproximal enamel reduction.
title_full_unstemmed Depth of acid penetration and enamel surface roughness associated with different methods of interproximal enamel reduction.
title_sort depth of acid penetration and enamel surface roughness associated with different methods of interproximal enamel reduction.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2020-01-01
description OBJECTIVES:To assess and compare the enamel surface quality after interproximal enamel reduction (IPR) was performed with different systems and to study the relation between acid penetration depth and enamel surface quality as well as the importance of remineralization. METHODS:Sixty-five extracted teeth were randomly allocated to five experimental groups: untreated control, manual with New Metal Strips, mechanical with oscillating segment (OS) discs, Safe-Tipped Bur Kit, and the Ortho-Strip, followed by 30 s of polishing with the Softflex system and the Compo-system after treating the tooth with OS discs. Mesial surfaces were demineralized for 24 h and distal surfaces were subjected to interchanging demineralization and remineralization cycles of 24 h each for 18 days. The analysis was carried out by profilometry, scanning electron microscopy, and polarization microscopy. RESULTS:After IPR and polishing, enamel roughness was reduced for all systems tested except for the Essix Safe-Tipped Bur Kit. Subsequent demineralization increased enamel roughness in all groups except controls beyond the original level prior to IPR except for IPR with New Metal Strips or Ortho-Strips and subsequent polishing. Cyclic demineralization and remineralization for 18 days yielded a reduction in acid penetration depth and an increase in surface smoothness, which correlated with each other only for controls and treatment with New Metal Strips or Ortho-Strips. CONCLUSIONS:Manual IPR, using New Metal Strips and, even more, the oscillating IPR system Ortho-Strips, yielded smoother interproximal enamel surfaces and less acid penetration depth than the IPR systems with OS discs and the Safe-Tipped Bur Kit after polishing and 18 days of cyclic demineralization and remineralization. Irrespective of the IPR procedure, proper remineralization of IPR-treated surfaces is advisable to reduce caries susceptibility.
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229595
work_keys_str_mv AT gholamrezadanesh depthofacidpenetrationandenamelsurfaceroughnessassociatedwithdifferentmethodsofinterproximalenamelreduction
AT pascalkaikonstantinpodstawa depthofacidpenetrationandenamelsurfaceroughnessassociatedwithdifferentmethodsofinterproximalenamelreduction
AT cateemiliaschwartz depthofacidpenetrationandenamelsurfaceroughnessassociatedwithdifferentmethodsofinterproximalenamelreduction
AT christiankirschneck depthofacidpenetrationandenamelsurfaceroughnessassociatedwithdifferentmethodsofinterproximalenamelreduction
AT mozhganbizhang depthofacidpenetrationandenamelsurfaceroughnessassociatedwithdifferentmethodsofinterproximalenamelreduction
AT wolfgangharnold depthofacidpenetrationandenamelsurfaceroughnessassociatedwithdifferentmethodsofinterproximalenamelreduction
_version_ 1714816004175953920