Fifteen-year response of weed control intensity and seedling type on Norway spruce survival and growth on arable land

The effects of seedling type (2-year-old container seedlings vs. 4-year-old bare-rooted seedlings) and post-planting vegetation control intensity on the growth and survival of Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) seedlings were compared based on 15-year data from a field experiment...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hytönen, Jyrki, Jylhä, Paula
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Finnish Society of Forest Science 2008-01-01
Series:Silva Fennica
Online Access:https://www.silvafennica.fi/article/242
id doaj-a932dbca57d447ccb10d4ec4506626ef
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a932dbca57d447ccb10d4ec4506626ef2020-11-25T02:41:20ZengFinnish Society of Forest ScienceSilva Fennica2242-40752008-01-0142310.14214/sf.242Fifteen-year response of weed control intensity and seedling type on Norway spruce survival and growth on arable landHytönen, JyrkiJylhä, Paula The effects of seedling type (2-year-old container seedlings vs. 4-year-old bare-rooted seedlings) and post-planting vegetation control intensity on the growth and survival of Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) seedlings were compared based on 15-year data from a field experiment established on arable land. Vegetation control treatments with terbuthylazine and glyphosate were carried out 1â3 times on successive years, either as overall or spot applications. The highest stand volumes were obtained with the combination of large bare-rooted seedlings and effective vegetation control. Volume of bare-rooted seedlings was greater than that of container seedlings in all treatments (e.g. on the control plots 9.5 m/ha vs. 4.1 m/ha). The best results were obtained with the most intensive weed control treatments (spot treatment repeated twice and overall application repeated three times). These treatments increased both bare-rooted and containerised seedlingsâ survival by 33â40% units and their height, breast height diameter, and volume by 45â49%, 17â47%, and 249â279%, respectively. In terms of survival, the container seedlings, in due part to their smaller size, benefited from vegetation control more than the bare-rooted seedlings. Successive early summer frosts damaged the seedlings and significantly retarded their growth. The frequency of frost damage was not affected by vegetation control nor was it attributed to seedling type.33https://www.silvafennica.fi/article/242
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Hytönen, Jyrki
Jylhä, Paula
spellingShingle Hytönen, Jyrki
Jylhä, Paula
Fifteen-year response of weed control intensity and seedling type on Norway spruce survival and growth on arable land
Silva Fennica
author_facet Hytönen, Jyrki
Jylhä, Paula
author_sort Hytönen, Jyrki
title Fifteen-year response of weed control intensity and seedling type on Norway spruce survival and growth on arable land
title_short Fifteen-year response of weed control intensity and seedling type on Norway spruce survival and growth on arable land
title_full Fifteen-year response of weed control intensity and seedling type on Norway spruce survival and growth on arable land
title_fullStr Fifteen-year response of weed control intensity and seedling type on Norway spruce survival and growth on arable land
title_full_unstemmed Fifteen-year response of weed control intensity and seedling type on Norway spruce survival and growth on arable land
title_sort fifteen-year response of weed control intensity and seedling type on norway spruce survival and growth on arable land
publisher Finnish Society of Forest Science
series Silva Fennica
issn 2242-4075
publishDate 2008-01-01
description The effects of seedling type (2-year-old container seedlings vs. 4-year-old bare-rooted seedlings) and post-planting vegetation control intensity on the growth and survival of Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) seedlings were compared based on 15-year data from a field experiment established on arable land. Vegetation control treatments with terbuthylazine and glyphosate were carried out 1â3 times on successive years, either as overall or spot applications. The highest stand volumes were obtained with the combination of large bare-rooted seedlings and effective vegetation control. Volume of bare-rooted seedlings was greater than that of container seedlings in all treatments (e.g. on the control plots 9.5 m/ha vs. 4.1 m/ha). The best results were obtained with the most intensive weed control treatments (spot treatment repeated twice and overall application repeated three times). These treatments increased both bare-rooted and containerised seedlingsâ survival by 33â40% units and their height, breast height diameter, and volume by 45â49%, 17â47%, and 249â279%, respectively. In terms of survival, the container seedlings, in due part to their smaller size, benefited from vegetation control more than the bare-rooted seedlings. Successive early summer frosts damaged the seedlings and significantly retarded their growth. The frequency of frost damage was not affected by vegetation control nor was it attributed to seedling type.33
url https://www.silvafennica.fi/article/242
work_keys_str_mv AT hytonenjyrki fifteenyearresponseofweedcontrolintensityandseedlingtypeonnorwaysprucesurvivalandgrowthonarableland
AT jylhapaula fifteenyearresponseofweedcontrolintensityandseedlingtypeonnorwaysprucesurvivalandgrowthonarableland
_version_ 1724778869487042560