Return smoothing and its implications for performance analysis of hedge funds

Return smoothing and performance persistence are both sources of autocorrelation in hedge fund returns. The practice of pre-processing the data in order to remove smoothing before conducting performance analysis also affects the predictability of hedge fund returns. This paper develops a Bayesian fr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jing-zhi Huang, John Liechty, Marco Rossi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: KeAi Communications Co., Ltd. 2018-12-01
Series:Journal of Finance and Data Science
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405918818300473
id doaj-a930a81e6a5c4bbfb364511aedd5a1a4
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a930a81e6a5c4bbfb364511aedd5a1a42021-02-02T03:17:58ZengKeAi Communications Co., Ltd.Journal of Finance and Data Science2405-91882018-12-0144203222Return smoothing and its implications for performance analysis of hedge fundsJing-zhi Huang0John Liechty1Marco Rossi2Pennsylvania State University, USAPennsylvania State University, USATexas A&M University, USA; Corresponding author.Return smoothing and performance persistence are both sources of autocorrelation in hedge fund returns. The practice of pre-processing the data in order to remove smoothing before conducting performance analysis also affects the predictability of hedge fund returns. This paper develops a Bayesian framework for the performance evaluation of hedge funds that simultaneously accounts for smoothing, time-varying performance and factor loadings, and the short-lived nature of reported returns. Simulation evidence reveals that “unsmoothing” predictable, persistent hedge fund returns reduces the ability to detect performance persistence in the second step of the analysis. Empirically, smoothing generates severe biases in standard estimates of abnormal performance, factor loadings, and idiosyncratic volatility. In particular, for funds with high systematic risk, a standard deviation increase in smoothing implies an upward bias in α in excess of 2% annually and a downward bias in equity market beta of more than 20%. For funds with low systematic risk exposure, the smoothing bias is most apparent in estimates of idiosyncratic volatility. Keywords: Hedge funds, Smoothing, Performance persistence, Bayesian model, JEL Classification: G11, G23, G58http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405918818300473
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jing-zhi Huang
John Liechty
Marco Rossi
spellingShingle Jing-zhi Huang
John Liechty
Marco Rossi
Return smoothing and its implications for performance analysis of hedge funds
Journal of Finance and Data Science
author_facet Jing-zhi Huang
John Liechty
Marco Rossi
author_sort Jing-zhi Huang
title Return smoothing and its implications for performance analysis of hedge funds
title_short Return smoothing and its implications for performance analysis of hedge funds
title_full Return smoothing and its implications for performance analysis of hedge funds
title_fullStr Return smoothing and its implications for performance analysis of hedge funds
title_full_unstemmed Return smoothing and its implications for performance analysis of hedge funds
title_sort return smoothing and its implications for performance analysis of hedge funds
publisher KeAi Communications Co., Ltd.
series Journal of Finance and Data Science
issn 2405-9188
publishDate 2018-12-01
description Return smoothing and performance persistence are both sources of autocorrelation in hedge fund returns. The practice of pre-processing the data in order to remove smoothing before conducting performance analysis also affects the predictability of hedge fund returns. This paper develops a Bayesian framework for the performance evaluation of hedge funds that simultaneously accounts for smoothing, time-varying performance and factor loadings, and the short-lived nature of reported returns. Simulation evidence reveals that “unsmoothing” predictable, persistent hedge fund returns reduces the ability to detect performance persistence in the second step of the analysis. Empirically, smoothing generates severe biases in standard estimates of abnormal performance, factor loadings, and idiosyncratic volatility. In particular, for funds with high systematic risk, a standard deviation increase in smoothing implies an upward bias in α in excess of 2% annually and a downward bias in equity market beta of more than 20%. For funds with low systematic risk exposure, the smoothing bias is most apparent in estimates of idiosyncratic volatility. Keywords: Hedge funds, Smoothing, Performance persistence, Bayesian model, JEL Classification: G11, G23, G58
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405918818300473
work_keys_str_mv AT jingzhihuang returnsmoothinganditsimplicationsforperformanceanalysisofhedgefunds
AT johnliechty returnsmoothinganditsimplicationsforperformanceanalysisofhedgefunds
AT marcorossi returnsmoothinganditsimplicationsforperformanceanalysisofhedgefunds
_version_ 1724308179650609152