Bridging Psychology and Mathematics Education: Reflections on Boundary Crossing
Collaborations between psychology and mathematics education have the potential to yield progress on critical questions about the teaching and learning of mathematics. In this paper, we describe our experience of collaborating at this boundary. We have found that collaboration has many benefits: it s...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
PsychOpen
2018-06-01
|
Series: | Journal of Numerical Cognition |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://jnc.psychopen.eu/article/view/111 |
id |
doaj-a8fd584f43234f02944662649747186a |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-a8fd584f43234f02944662649747186a2020-11-24T21:02:22ZengPsychOpenJournal of Numerical Cognition2363-87612018-06-0141091810.5964/jnc.v4i1.111jnc.v4i1.111Bridging Psychology and Mathematics Education: Reflections on Boundary CrossingMartha W. Alibali0Eric J. Knuth1Department of Psychology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USADepartment of Curriculum and Instruction, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USACollaborations between psychology and mathematics education have the potential to yield progress on critical questions about the teaching and learning of mathematics. In this paper, we describe our experience of collaborating at this boundary. We have found that collaboration has many benefits: it strengthens the research, it is professionally enriching, and it brings novel perspectives to disciplinary communities. However, collaboration is also challenging, because different views about the nature of knowledge and the aims of inquiry can be difficult to bridge. Collaboration can also raise difficult questions about professional identity. We consider several factors that are critical to success in interdisciplinary collaboration, including methodological openness, a broad view of what constitutes “basic” and “applied” research, and an appreciation for diverse perspectives and varying levels of analysis. We close by offering some advice for others who wish to collaborate at the boundary of psychology and mathematics education.http://jnc.psychopen.eu/article/view/111collaborationinterdisciplinary workmathematics learningmathematics education |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Martha W. Alibali Eric J. Knuth |
spellingShingle |
Martha W. Alibali Eric J. Knuth Bridging Psychology and Mathematics Education: Reflections on Boundary Crossing Journal of Numerical Cognition collaboration interdisciplinary work mathematics learning mathematics education |
author_facet |
Martha W. Alibali Eric J. Knuth |
author_sort |
Martha W. Alibali |
title |
Bridging Psychology and Mathematics Education: Reflections on Boundary Crossing |
title_short |
Bridging Psychology and Mathematics Education: Reflections on Boundary Crossing |
title_full |
Bridging Psychology and Mathematics Education: Reflections on Boundary Crossing |
title_fullStr |
Bridging Psychology and Mathematics Education: Reflections on Boundary Crossing |
title_full_unstemmed |
Bridging Psychology and Mathematics Education: Reflections on Boundary Crossing |
title_sort |
bridging psychology and mathematics education: reflections on boundary crossing |
publisher |
PsychOpen |
series |
Journal of Numerical Cognition |
issn |
2363-8761 |
publishDate |
2018-06-01 |
description |
Collaborations between psychology and mathematics education have the potential to yield progress on critical questions about the teaching and learning of mathematics. In this paper, we describe our experience of collaborating at this boundary. We have found that collaboration has many benefits: it strengthens the research, it is professionally enriching, and it brings novel perspectives to disciplinary communities. However, collaboration is also challenging, because different views about the nature of knowledge and the aims of inquiry can be difficult to bridge. Collaboration can also raise difficult questions about professional identity. We consider several factors that are critical to success in interdisciplinary collaboration, including methodological openness, a broad view of what constitutes “basic” and “applied” research, and an appreciation for diverse perspectives and varying levels of analysis. We close by offering some advice for others who wish to collaborate at the boundary of psychology and mathematics education. |
topic |
collaboration interdisciplinary work mathematics learning mathematics education |
url |
http://jnc.psychopen.eu/article/view/111 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT marthawalibali bridgingpsychologyandmathematicseducationreflectionsonboundarycrossing AT ericjknuth bridgingpsychologyandmathematicseducationreflectionsonboundarycrossing |
_version_ |
1716775618736029696 |