Bridging Psychology and Mathematics Education: Reflections on Boundary Crossing

Collaborations between psychology and mathematics education have the potential to yield progress on critical questions about the teaching and learning of mathematics. In this paper, we describe our experience of collaborating at this boundary. We have found that collaboration has many benefits: it s...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Martha W. Alibali, Eric J. Knuth
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: PsychOpen 2018-06-01
Series:Journal of Numerical Cognition
Subjects:
Online Access:http://jnc.psychopen.eu/article/view/111
id doaj-a8fd584f43234f02944662649747186a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a8fd584f43234f02944662649747186a2020-11-24T21:02:22ZengPsychOpenJournal of Numerical Cognition2363-87612018-06-0141091810.5964/jnc.v4i1.111jnc.v4i1.111Bridging Psychology and Mathematics Education: Reflections on Boundary CrossingMartha W. Alibali0Eric J. Knuth1Department of Psychology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USADepartment of Curriculum and Instruction, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USACollaborations between psychology and mathematics education have the potential to yield progress on critical questions about the teaching and learning of mathematics. In this paper, we describe our experience of collaborating at this boundary. We have found that collaboration has many benefits: it strengthens the research, it is professionally enriching, and it brings novel perspectives to disciplinary communities. However, collaboration is also challenging, because different views about the nature of knowledge and the aims of inquiry can be difficult to bridge. Collaboration can also raise difficult questions about professional identity. We consider several factors that are critical to success in interdisciplinary collaboration, including methodological openness, a broad view of what constitutes “basic” and “applied” research, and an appreciation for diverse perspectives and varying levels of analysis. We close by offering some advice for others who wish to collaborate at the boundary of psychology and mathematics education.http://jnc.psychopen.eu/article/view/111collaborationinterdisciplinary workmathematics learningmathematics education
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Martha W. Alibali
Eric J. Knuth
spellingShingle Martha W. Alibali
Eric J. Knuth
Bridging Psychology and Mathematics Education: Reflections on Boundary Crossing
Journal of Numerical Cognition
collaboration
interdisciplinary work
mathematics learning
mathematics education
author_facet Martha W. Alibali
Eric J. Knuth
author_sort Martha W. Alibali
title Bridging Psychology and Mathematics Education: Reflections on Boundary Crossing
title_short Bridging Psychology and Mathematics Education: Reflections on Boundary Crossing
title_full Bridging Psychology and Mathematics Education: Reflections on Boundary Crossing
title_fullStr Bridging Psychology and Mathematics Education: Reflections on Boundary Crossing
title_full_unstemmed Bridging Psychology and Mathematics Education: Reflections on Boundary Crossing
title_sort bridging psychology and mathematics education: reflections on boundary crossing
publisher PsychOpen
series Journal of Numerical Cognition
issn 2363-8761
publishDate 2018-06-01
description Collaborations between psychology and mathematics education have the potential to yield progress on critical questions about the teaching and learning of mathematics. In this paper, we describe our experience of collaborating at this boundary. We have found that collaboration has many benefits: it strengthens the research, it is professionally enriching, and it brings novel perspectives to disciplinary communities. However, collaboration is also challenging, because different views about the nature of knowledge and the aims of inquiry can be difficult to bridge. Collaboration can also raise difficult questions about professional identity. We consider several factors that are critical to success in interdisciplinary collaboration, including methodological openness, a broad view of what constitutes “basic” and “applied” research, and an appreciation for diverse perspectives and varying levels of analysis. We close by offering some advice for others who wish to collaborate at the boundary of psychology and mathematics education.
topic collaboration
interdisciplinary work
mathematics learning
mathematics education
url http://jnc.psychopen.eu/article/view/111
work_keys_str_mv AT marthawalibali bridgingpsychologyandmathematicseducationreflectionsonboundarycrossing
AT ericjknuth bridgingpsychologyandmathematicseducationreflectionsonboundarycrossing
_version_ 1716775618736029696