Validation of Theory: Exploring and Reframing Popper’s Worlds

Popper’s well-known arguments describe the need for advancing social theorythrough a process of falsification. Despite Popper’s call, there has been little change inthe academic process of theory development and testing. This paper builds on Popper’slesser-known idea of “three worlds” (physical, emo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Steven E. Wallis
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: ARINA, Inc. 2008-12-01
Series:Integral Review
Subjects:
Online Access:http://integral-review.org/documents/Wallis,%20Validation%20of%20Theory,%20Vol.%204%20No.%202.pdf
id doaj-a8f66d88ceec4021badfccf4ffdb37ae
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a8f66d88ceec4021badfccf4ffdb37ae2020-11-24T22:23:00ZdeuARINA, Inc.Integral Review1553-30692008-12-01427191Validation of Theory: Exploring and Reframing Popper’s WorldsSteven E. WallisPopper’s well-known arguments describe the need for advancing social theorythrough a process of falsification. Despite Popper’s call, there has been little change inthe academic process of theory development and testing. This paper builds on Popper’slesser-known idea of “three worlds” (physical, emotional/conceptual, and theoretical) toinvestigate the relationship between knowledge, theory, and action. In this paper, Iexplore his three worlds to identify alternative routes to support the validation of theory. Isuggest there are alternative methods for validation, both between, and within, the threeworlds and that a combination of validation and falsification methods may be superior toany one method. Integral thinking is also put forward to support the validation process.Rather than repeating the call for full Popperian falsification, this paper recognizes thatthe current level of social theorizing provides little opportunity for such falsification.Rather than sidestepping the goal of Popperian falsification, the paths suggested here maybe seen as providing both validation and falsification as stepping-stones toward the goalof more effective social and organizational theory.http://integral-review.org/documents/Wallis,%20Validation%20of%20Theory,%20Vol.%204%20No.%202.pdfFalsificationmetatheoryphilosophy of sciencetheory of theorythreeworldsvalidation of theory
collection DOAJ
language deu
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Steven E. Wallis
spellingShingle Steven E. Wallis
Validation of Theory: Exploring and Reframing Popper’s Worlds
Integral Review
Falsification
metatheory
philosophy of science
theory of theory
threeworlds
validation of theory
author_facet Steven E. Wallis
author_sort Steven E. Wallis
title Validation of Theory: Exploring and Reframing Popper’s Worlds
title_short Validation of Theory: Exploring and Reframing Popper’s Worlds
title_full Validation of Theory: Exploring and Reframing Popper’s Worlds
title_fullStr Validation of Theory: Exploring and Reframing Popper’s Worlds
title_full_unstemmed Validation of Theory: Exploring and Reframing Popper’s Worlds
title_sort validation of theory: exploring and reframing popper’s worlds
publisher ARINA, Inc.
series Integral Review
issn 1553-3069
publishDate 2008-12-01
description Popper’s well-known arguments describe the need for advancing social theorythrough a process of falsification. Despite Popper’s call, there has been little change inthe academic process of theory development and testing. This paper builds on Popper’slesser-known idea of “three worlds” (physical, emotional/conceptual, and theoretical) toinvestigate the relationship between knowledge, theory, and action. In this paper, Iexplore his three worlds to identify alternative routes to support the validation of theory. Isuggest there are alternative methods for validation, both between, and within, the threeworlds and that a combination of validation and falsification methods may be superior toany one method. Integral thinking is also put forward to support the validation process.Rather than repeating the call for full Popperian falsification, this paper recognizes thatthe current level of social theorizing provides little opportunity for such falsification.Rather than sidestepping the goal of Popperian falsification, the paths suggested here maybe seen as providing both validation and falsification as stepping-stones toward the goalof more effective social and organizational theory.
topic Falsification
metatheory
philosophy of science
theory of theory
threeworlds
validation of theory
url http://integral-review.org/documents/Wallis,%20Validation%20of%20Theory,%20Vol.%204%20No.%202.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT stevenewallis validationoftheoryexploringandreframingpoppersworlds
_version_ 1725766341382635520