Treatment Effects of Occipitomental Anchorage Appliance of Maxillary Protraction Combined with Chincup Traction in Children with Class III Malocclusion

Treatment Effects of Occipitomental Anchorage Appliance of Maxillary Protraction Combined with Chincup Traction in Children with Class III Malocclusion

Little information related to the treatment effects of the occipitomental anchorage (OMA) appliance of maxillary (Mx) protraction combined with chincup traction is available. The aim of this study was to investigate the treatment effects of the OMA orthopedic appliance on patients with Class III mal...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors:	Hsiang-Chien Lin, Hong-Po Chang, Hsin-Fu Chang
Format:	Article
Language:	English
Published:	Elsevier 2007-05-01
Series:	Journal of the Formosan Medical Association
Subjects:	chincup traction growing children maxillary protraction occipitomental (OMA) appliance skeletal Class III malocclusion
Online Access:	http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0929664609603235

Similar Items

Splinted mandibular protraction appliance
by: Ashok Kumar Jena, et al.
Published: (2015-01-01)

Maxillary protraction after surgically assisted maxillary expansion
by: Laurindo Zanco Furquim, et al.
Published: (2010-06-01)

Different approaches to the treatment of skeletal Class II malocclusion during growth: Bionator versus extraoral appliance
by: Renato Barcellos Rédua

Facemask performance during maxillary protraction: a finite element analysis (FEA) evaluation of load and stress distribution on Delaire facemask
by: Francesca Gazzani, et al.
Published: (2018-07-01)

Developing Class III malocclusions: challenges and solutions
by: Zere E, et al.
Published: (2018-06-01)

Circumaxillary Suture Strain during Midpalatal Suture Opening and Maxillary Protraction
by: Jackson, Remigius Kalasanz
Published: (2012)

Long-term maxillary three dimensional changes following maxillary protraction with or without expansion: A systematic review and meta-analysis
by: Wei-Cheng Lee, et al.
Published: (2021-01-01)

Cephalometric assessment of vertical control in the treatment of class II malocclusion with a combined maxillary splint
by: Ivana Uglik Garbui, et al.
Published: (2010-03-01)

Long term results of double plate appliance and facemask combination in the treatment of Class III malocclusion: cephalometric analysis
by: Emine Kaygisiz, et al.
Published: (2018-09-01)

Orthopedic treatment of Class III malocclusion with rapid maxillary expansion combined with a face mask: a cephalometric assessment of craniofacial growth patterns
by: Daniella Torres Tagawa, et al.
Published: (2012-06-01)

Long-term maxillary behavior in treated skeletal Class II malocclusion
by: Ana de Lourdes Sá de Lira, et al.
Published: (2015-10-01)

Clinical effects of fixed functional Herbst appliance in the treatment of class II/1 malocclusion
by: Nedeljković Nenad, et al.
Published: (2009-01-01)

Maxillary protraction by reverse headgear treatment in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate: A cephalometric evaluation
by: Sapna Singla, et al.
Published: (2018-01-01)

Stress on facial skin of class III subjects during maxillary protraction: a finite element analysis
by: Francesca Gazzani, et al.
Published: (2019-02-01)

The effect of unilateral Forsus appliance in the treatment of ClassⅡmalocclusion subdivision
by: WU Feng, et al.
Published: (2017-09-01)

Maxillary protraction with rapid maxillary expansion and facemask versus skeletal anchorage with mini-implants in class III patients: a non-randomized clinical trial
by: Ricardo Alves de Souza, et al.
Published: (2019-09-01)

Cephalometric evaluation of effectiveness Interland headgear on class II, division 1, malocclusion
by: Ana Zilda Nazar Bergamo de Carvalho, et al.
Published: (2015-12-01)

Comparative evaluation of the skeletal and dentoalveolar effects of Thurow and activator appliances in patients with Class II malocclusion
by: maryam omidkhod, et al.
Published: (2018-06-01)

Elastics Selector Gauge as Orthodontics Device Applied to Inter-Maxillary Traction during Malocclusion Correction
by: Sergio Sambataro, et al.
Published: (2019-08-01)

Sınıf III malokluzyonlarında uygulanan tedavi sistemleri
by: Burcu Balos Tuncer
Published: (2011-11-01)

Changes in canine position during maxillary molar distalization with mini-implant and CD appliance: an in vitro study
by: CHEN Jianming, et al.
Published: (2020-11-01)

Dentoskeletal and aesthetic effects of mandibular protraction appliance (MPA) using Ricketts analysis
by: Marcelo CHACON, et al.
Published: (2018-02-01)

Avaliação cefalométrica dos efeitos do aparelho de protração mandibular (APM) associado à aparatologia fixa em relação às estruturas esqueléticas em pacientes portadores de má oclusão Classe II, 1ª divisão Cephalometric evaluation of the effects of the joint use of a mandibular protraction appliance (MPA) and a fixed orthodontic appliance on the skeletal structures of patients with Angle Class II, division 1 malocclusion
by: Emmanuelle Medeiros de Araújo, et al.
Published: (2011-06-01)

Effect of protraction facemask on the temporomandibular joint: A systematic review
by: Cen, X., et al.
Published: (2018)

Effects of three types of functional appliances in class II malocclusions treatment - sagittal and vertical changes
by: Ristić Vladimir, et al.
Published: (2018-01-01)

Early treatment of Class III malocclusion by RME and modified Tandem appliance
by: Juhi Ansar, et al.
Published: (2015-01-01)

Dentoskeletal Class II Malocclusion: Maxillary Molar Distalization with No-Compliance Fixed Orthodontic Equipment
by: Vincenzo Quinzi, et al.
Published: (2020-03-01)

Treatment effects of R-appliance and Anterior Inclined Bite Plate in Class II, Division I malocclusion
by: Rahman Showkatbakhsh, et al.
Published: (2011-12-01)

Treatment of severe rotations of maxillary central incisors with whip appliance: Report of three cases
by: Iman Parisay, et al.
Published: (2014-01-01)

Evaluation of dentoskeletal effects of Farmand functional appliance (Fa II) on class II malocclusion
by: Yassaei S., et al.
Published: (2007-07-01)

Class II malocclusion therapy using fixed orthodontic appliance
by: Škufca Bojan, et al.
Published: (2007-01-01)

Treatment with facemask and removable upper appliance versus modified tandem traction bow appliance: The effects on mandibular space
by: Erkun, S., et al.
Published: (2018)

Treatment of skeletal class II division 1 malocclusion with mandibular deficiency using myofunctional appliances in growing individuals
by: Y Pachori, et al.
Published: (2012-01-01)

Facemask performance during maxillary protraction: a finite element analysis (FEA) evaluation of load and stress distribution on Delaire facemask
by: Cozza, P., et al.
Published: (2018)

Treatment Effects of Farmand Functional Appliance on Class II Division 1 Malocclusion
by: HR Pakshir, et al.
Published: (2016-01-01)

Herbst appliance with skeletal anchorage versus dental anchorage in adolescents with Class II malocclusion: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
by: Klaus Barretto dos Santos Lopes Batista, et al.
Published: (2017-11-01)

Influencing factors of functional orthopedic appliances on skeletal class Ⅱ malocclusion in adolescents
by: WANG Huixia, et al.
Published: (2020-02-01)

Treatment of pseudo Class III malocclusion by modified Hawleys appliance with inverted labial bow
by: K S Negi, et al.
Published: (2011-01-01)

Correction of class III malocclusion using modified tandem appliance-two case reports
by: J Jeevarathan, et al.
Published: (2013-01-01)

Effect of functional appliances on the airway dimensions in patients with skeletal class II malocclusion: A systematic review
by: Annapurna Kannan, et al.
Published: (2017-01-01)