Facial protection for healthcare workers during pandemics: a scoping review

Background The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has led to personal protective equipment (PPE) shortages, requiring mask reuse or improvisation. We provide a review of medical-grade facial protection (surgical masks, N95 respirators and face shields) for healthcare workers, the safety an...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Peter D Sullivan, Laura R Garcia Godoy, Amy E Jones, Taylor N Anderson, Cameron L Fisher, Kylie M L Seeley, Erynn A Beeson, Hannah K Zane, Jaime W Peterson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMJ Publishing Group 2020-05-01
Series:BMJ Global Health
Online Access:https://gh.bmj.com/content/5/5/e002553.full
id doaj-a8eb9d6b96104491922e4a9b591b7afb
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a8eb9d6b96104491922e4a9b591b7afb2020-11-25T02:43:21ZengBMJ Publishing GroupBMJ Global Health2059-79082020-05-015510.1136/bmjgh-2020-002553Facial protection for healthcare workers during pandemics: a scoping reviewPeter D Sullivan0Laura R Garcia Godoy1Amy E Jones2Taylor N Anderson3Cameron L Fisher4Kylie M L Seeley5Erynn A Beeson6Hannah K Zane7Jaime W Peterson83 Department of Internal Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University Hospital, Portland, Oregon, USA1 School of Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA1 School of Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA1 School of Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA1 School of Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA1 School of Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA1 School of Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA1 School of Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA2 Department of Pediatrics, Oregon Health and Science University Hospital, Portland, Oregon, USABackground The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has led to personal protective equipment (PPE) shortages, requiring mask reuse or improvisation. We provide a review of medical-grade facial protection (surgical masks, N95 respirators and face shields) for healthcare workers, the safety and efficacy of decontamination methods, and the utility of alternative strategies in emergency shortages or resource-scarce settings.Methods We conducted a scoping review of PubMed and grey literature related to facial protection and potential adaptation strategies in the setting of PPE shortages (January 2000 to March 2020). Limitations included few COVID-19-specific studies and exclusion of non-English language articles. We conducted a narrative synthesis of the evidence based on relevant healthcare settings to increase practical utility in decision-making.Results We retrieved 5462 peer-reviewed articles and 41 grey literature records. In total, we included 67 records which met inclusion criteria. Compared with surgical masks, N95 respirators perform better in laboratory testing, may provide superior protection in inpatient settings and perform equivalently in outpatient settings. Surgical mask and N95 respirator conservation strategies include extended use, reuse or decontamination, but these strategies may result in inferior protection. Limited evidence suggests that reused and improvised masks should be used when medical-grade protection is unavailable.Conclusion The COVID-19 pandemic has led to critical shortages of medical-grade PPE. Alternative forms of facial protection offer inferior protection. More robust evidence is required on different types of medical-grade facial protection. As research on COVID-19 advances, investigators should continue to examine the impact on alternatives of medical-grade facial protection.https://gh.bmj.com/content/5/5/e002553.full
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Peter D Sullivan
Laura R Garcia Godoy
Amy E Jones
Taylor N Anderson
Cameron L Fisher
Kylie M L Seeley
Erynn A Beeson
Hannah K Zane
Jaime W Peterson
spellingShingle Peter D Sullivan
Laura R Garcia Godoy
Amy E Jones
Taylor N Anderson
Cameron L Fisher
Kylie M L Seeley
Erynn A Beeson
Hannah K Zane
Jaime W Peterson
Facial protection for healthcare workers during pandemics: a scoping review
BMJ Global Health
author_facet Peter D Sullivan
Laura R Garcia Godoy
Amy E Jones
Taylor N Anderson
Cameron L Fisher
Kylie M L Seeley
Erynn A Beeson
Hannah K Zane
Jaime W Peterson
author_sort Peter D Sullivan
title Facial protection for healthcare workers during pandemics: a scoping review
title_short Facial protection for healthcare workers during pandemics: a scoping review
title_full Facial protection for healthcare workers during pandemics: a scoping review
title_fullStr Facial protection for healthcare workers during pandemics: a scoping review
title_full_unstemmed Facial protection for healthcare workers during pandemics: a scoping review
title_sort facial protection for healthcare workers during pandemics: a scoping review
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
series BMJ Global Health
issn 2059-7908
publishDate 2020-05-01
description Background The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has led to personal protective equipment (PPE) shortages, requiring mask reuse or improvisation. We provide a review of medical-grade facial protection (surgical masks, N95 respirators and face shields) for healthcare workers, the safety and efficacy of decontamination methods, and the utility of alternative strategies in emergency shortages or resource-scarce settings.Methods We conducted a scoping review of PubMed and grey literature related to facial protection and potential adaptation strategies in the setting of PPE shortages (January 2000 to March 2020). Limitations included few COVID-19-specific studies and exclusion of non-English language articles. We conducted a narrative synthesis of the evidence based on relevant healthcare settings to increase practical utility in decision-making.Results We retrieved 5462 peer-reviewed articles and 41 grey literature records. In total, we included 67 records which met inclusion criteria. Compared with surgical masks, N95 respirators perform better in laboratory testing, may provide superior protection in inpatient settings and perform equivalently in outpatient settings. Surgical mask and N95 respirator conservation strategies include extended use, reuse or decontamination, but these strategies may result in inferior protection. Limited evidence suggests that reused and improvised masks should be used when medical-grade protection is unavailable.Conclusion The COVID-19 pandemic has led to critical shortages of medical-grade PPE. Alternative forms of facial protection offer inferior protection. More robust evidence is required on different types of medical-grade facial protection. As research on COVID-19 advances, investigators should continue to examine the impact on alternatives of medical-grade facial protection.
url https://gh.bmj.com/content/5/5/e002553.full
work_keys_str_mv AT peterdsullivan facialprotectionforhealthcareworkersduringpandemicsascopingreview
AT laurargarciagodoy facialprotectionforhealthcareworkersduringpandemicsascopingreview
AT amyejones facialprotectionforhealthcareworkersduringpandemicsascopingreview
AT taylornanderson facialprotectionforhealthcareworkersduringpandemicsascopingreview
AT cameronlfisher facialprotectionforhealthcareworkersduringpandemicsascopingreview
AT kyliemlseeley facialprotectionforhealthcareworkersduringpandemicsascopingreview
AT erynnabeeson facialprotectionforhealthcareworkersduringpandemicsascopingreview
AT hannahkzane facialprotectionforhealthcareworkersduringpandemicsascopingreview
AT jaimewpeterson facialprotectionforhealthcareworkersduringpandemicsascopingreview
_version_ 1724769820676718592