Economic Restructuring and Capital Inflow: Thailand and Korea

South Korea and Thailand which are receiving the financial support from IMF got similar international remarks on promoting the economic reform that has an exemplary effect. However, there are not only differences in the causes of the economic crisis, but also the status and effect of the economic re...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jae-Bong Ro, Kyoung-Dong Kwon
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Korea Institute for International Economic Policy 1998-12-01
Series:East Asian Economic Review
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.11644/KIEP.JEAI.1998.2.4.32
id doaj-a8e74c0919b243f0984f433f044af077
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a8e74c0919b243f0984f433f044af0772020-11-25T01:26:00ZengKorea Institute for International Economic PolicyEast Asian Economic Review2508-16402508-16671998-12-012475102http://dx.doi.org/10.11644/KIEP.JEAI.1998.2.4.32Economic Restructuring and Capital Inflow: Thailand and Korea Jae-Bong Ro Kyoung-Dong Kwon South Korea and Thailand which are receiving the financial support from IMF got similar international remarks on promoting the economic reform that has an exemplary effect. However, there are not only differences in the causes of the economic crisis, but also the status and effect of the economic reform. At present, Thailand gets a more ascendant status than South Korea in the "quo" status of attracting foreign investment. The reason is that the causes of the economic crisis in Thailand are relatively simple and the process of economic reform is also simple. Besides, Thailand is in the condition which made the effect came true easy. Meanwhile, since the procedures of firing the staff in Thailand are cut off, and the employees are easy to lose their jobs, it insures the flexibility of the labor market. Besides, the Thai government reduces the investment risk of foreigners by way of investing in stocks of the same value or remaining guarantee. South Korea also should insure the flexibility of the labor market and promote the flexibility of attracting foreign investment, which bases on the cooperation of the workers, employees and the government. If transfers the ill creditor’s rights to large bank, foreign investors should be encouraged by permitting an alternative of receiving the good asset or government warranty.http://dx.doi.org/10.11644/KIEP.JEAI.1998.2.4.32Economic RestructuringCapital InflowThailandKorea
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jae-Bong Ro
Kyoung-Dong Kwon
spellingShingle Jae-Bong Ro
Kyoung-Dong Kwon
Economic Restructuring and Capital Inflow: Thailand and Korea
East Asian Economic Review
Economic Restructuring
Capital Inflow
Thailand
Korea
author_facet Jae-Bong Ro
Kyoung-Dong Kwon
author_sort Jae-Bong Ro
title Economic Restructuring and Capital Inflow: Thailand and Korea
title_short Economic Restructuring and Capital Inflow: Thailand and Korea
title_full Economic Restructuring and Capital Inflow: Thailand and Korea
title_fullStr Economic Restructuring and Capital Inflow: Thailand and Korea
title_full_unstemmed Economic Restructuring and Capital Inflow: Thailand and Korea
title_sort economic restructuring and capital inflow: thailand and korea
publisher Korea Institute for International Economic Policy
series East Asian Economic Review
issn 2508-1640
2508-1667
publishDate 1998-12-01
description South Korea and Thailand which are receiving the financial support from IMF got similar international remarks on promoting the economic reform that has an exemplary effect. However, there are not only differences in the causes of the economic crisis, but also the status and effect of the economic reform. At present, Thailand gets a more ascendant status than South Korea in the "quo" status of attracting foreign investment. The reason is that the causes of the economic crisis in Thailand are relatively simple and the process of economic reform is also simple. Besides, Thailand is in the condition which made the effect came true easy. Meanwhile, since the procedures of firing the staff in Thailand are cut off, and the employees are easy to lose their jobs, it insures the flexibility of the labor market. Besides, the Thai government reduces the investment risk of foreigners by way of investing in stocks of the same value or remaining guarantee. South Korea also should insure the flexibility of the labor market and promote the flexibility of attracting foreign investment, which bases on the cooperation of the workers, employees and the government. If transfers the ill creditor’s rights to large bank, foreign investors should be encouraged by permitting an alternative of receiving the good asset or government warranty.
topic Economic Restructuring
Capital Inflow
Thailand
Korea
url http://dx.doi.org/10.11644/KIEP.JEAI.1998.2.4.32
work_keys_str_mv AT jaebongro economicrestructuringandcapitalinflowthailandandkorea
AT kyoungdongkwon economicrestructuringandcapitalinflowthailandandkorea
_version_ 1725111373494484992