IMPACT OF NICORANDIL IN ANGINA: SUBGROUP ANALYSES

Aims: IONA (impact of nicorandil in angina) is a randomised, double blind, placebo controlled trial of nicorandil, with a target dose of 20 mg twice daily. The consistency of benefits seen in subgroups is reported. Methods: The primary composite end point of the study was coronary heart disease deat...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: IONA Study Group
Format: Article
Language:Russian
Published: «FIRMA «SILICEA» LLC  2010-08-01
Series:Российский кардиологический журнал
Subjects:
Online Access:https://russjcardiol.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/1468
id doaj-a8e36b79ffd44a198f2f3980b98dfead
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a8e36b79ffd44a198f2f3980b98dfead2021-07-28T14:02:14Zrus«FIRMA «SILICEA» LLC Российский кардиологический журнал1560-40712618-76202010-08-010444481255IMPACT OF NICORANDIL IN ANGINA: SUBGROUP ANALYSESIONA Study GroupAims: IONA (impact of nicorandil in angina) is a randomised, double blind, placebo controlled trial of nicorandil, with a target dose of 20 mg twice daily. The consistency of benefits seen in subgroups is reported. Methods: The primary composite end point of the study was coronary heart disease death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, or unplanned hospitalisation for cardiac chest pain. Subgroups were defined using baseline characteristics including, age, sex, histories of smoking, diabetes, hypertension, myocardial infarction, revascularisation, anginal status, anti-anginal treatment, other cardiovascular drugs, and an overall assessment of risk. Results: A total of 5126 patients were randomised to receive nicorandil or identical placebo in addition to standard anti-anginal treatment. Overall, nicorandil reduced the incidence of the primary end point from 15.5% to 13.1% (hazard ratio (HR) 0.83, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.72 to 0.97; p = 0.014). There was no evidence of significant heterogeneity of benefit across all subgroups studied. The absolute risk reduction was greatest and the numbers needed to treat to prevent one event was lowest in subjects at greatest risk. Conclusions: The IONA study demonstrates a significant improvement in outcome by nicorandil treatment across a broad range of patients with stable angina.https://russjcardiol.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/1468стенокардияникорандилэффективность терапии
collection DOAJ
language Russian
format Article
sources DOAJ
author IONA Study Group
spellingShingle IONA Study Group
IMPACT OF NICORANDIL IN ANGINA: SUBGROUP ANALYSES
Российский кардиологический журнал
стенокардия
никорандил
эффективность терапии
author_facet IONA Study Group
author_sort IONA Study Group
title IMPACT OF NICORANDIL IN ANGINA: SUBGROUP ANALYSES
title_short IMPACT OF NICORANDIL IN ANGINA: SUBGROUP ANALYSES
title_full IMPACT OF NICORANDIL IN ANGINA: SUBGROUP ANALYSES
title_fullStr IMPACT OF NICORANDIL IN ANGINA: SUBGROUP ANALYSES
title_full_unstemmed IMPACT OF NICORANDIL IN ANGINA: SUBGROUP ANALYSES
title_sort impact of nicorandil in angina: subgroup analyses
publisher «FIRMA «SILICEA» LLC 
series Российский кардиологический журнал
issn 1560-4071
2618-7620
publishDate 2010-08-01
description Aims: IONA (impact of nicorandil in angina) is a randomised, double blind, placebo controlled trial of nicorandil, with a target dose of 20 mg twice daily. The consistency of benefits seen in subgroups is reported. Methods: The primary composite end point of the study was coronary heart disease death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, or unplanned hospitalisation for cardiac chest pain. Subgroups were defined using baseline characteristics including, age, sex, histories of smoking, diabetes, hypertension, myocardial infarction, revascularisation, anginal status, anti-anginal treatment, other cardiovascular drugs, and an overall assessment of risk. Results: A total of 5126 patients were randomised to receive nicorandil or identical placebo in addition to standard anti-anginal treatment. Overall, nicorandil reduced the incidence of the primary end point from 15.5% to 13.1% (hazard ratio (HR) 0.83, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.72 to 0.97; p = 0.014). There was no evidence of significant heterogeneity of benefit across all subgroups studied. The absolute risk reduction was greatest and the numbers needed to treat to prevent one event was lowest in subjects at greatest risk. Conclusions: The IONA study demonstrates a significant improvement in outcome by nicorandil treatment across a broad range of patients with stable angina.
topic стенокардия
никорандил
эффективность терапии
url https://russjcardiol.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/1468
work_keys_str_mv AT ionastudygroup impactofnicorandilinanginasubgroupanalyses
_version_ 1721269573743804416