Cost-optimal levels and energy performance certificates: Filling the gaps

The energy performance of buildings directive establishes that Member States must introduce minimum energy performance requirements for buildings and building components. Studies must be done based on a cost-optimal level methodology, considering the investment and operational costs to reach nearly...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alexandre Soares dos Reis, Marta Ferreira Dias
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2020-12-01
Series:Energy Reports
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352484720315973
id doaj-a8d40a8f50794784b840b0631a90002f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a8d40a8f50794784b840b0631a90002f2020-12-23T05:02:31ZengElsevierEnergy Reports2352-48472020-12-016358363Cost-optimal levels and energy performance certificates: Filling the gapsAlexandre Soares dos Reis0Marta Ferreira Dias1Corresponding author.; Research Unit on Governance, Competitiveness and Public Policies (GOVCOPP), Department of Economics, Management, Industrial Engineering and Tourism (DEGEIT), University of Aveiro, Campus Universitário de Santiago, 3810-193 Aveiro, PortugalResearch Unit on Governance, Competitiveness and Public Policies (GOVCOPP), Department of Economics, Management, Industrial Engineering and Tourism (DEGEIT), University of Aveiro, Campus Universitário de Santiago, 3810-193 Aveiro, PortugalThe energy performance of buildings directive establishes that Member States must introduce minimum energy performance requirements for buildings and building components. Studies must be done based on a cost-optimal level methodology, considering the investment and operational costs to reach nearly Zero Energy Buildings. However, there is a lack of information on the European Union guidelines concerning social and environmental issues. The existent framework requires Member States to make the calculations based on an economic perspective — a macroeconomic level and a financial level. Thus, the three-pillars (social, economic, and environmental) conception of sustainability is not fulfilled in the implementation of the present cost-optimal levels methodology. Neither indoor environmental quality is considered nor the environmental impact of the embodied CO2 in building components. Apart from this, current energy performance certificates are only energy-related. However, they have the potential to track also indoor environmental quality and the global environmental impact of building components. A new approach, both for cost-optimal levels and energy performance certificates, considering indoor environmental quality and the embodied CO2 in building components through a life cycle assessment, could fill the social and the environmental gaps.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352484720315973Cost-optimal levelsEnergy performance certificatesHealthIndoor environmental qualityLife cycle assessment
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Alexandre Soares dos Reis
Marta Ferreira Dias
spellingShingle Alexandre Soares dos Reis
Marta Ferreira Dias
Cost-optimal levels and energy performance certificates: Filling the gaps
Energy Reports
Cost-optimal levels
Energy performance certificates
Health
Indoor environmental quality
Life cycle assessment
author_facet Alexandre Soares dos Reis
Marta Ferreira Dias
author_sort Alexandre Soares dos Reis
title Cost-optimal levels and energy performance certificates: Filling the gaps
title_short Cost-optimal levels and energy performance certificates: Filling the gaps
title_full Cost-optimal levels and energy performance certificates: Filling the gaps
title_fullStr Cost-optimal levels and energy performance certificates: Filling the gaps
title_full_unstemmed Cost-optimal levels and energy performance certificates: Filling the gaps
title_sort cost-optimal levels and energy performance certificates: filling the gaps
publisher Elsevier
series Energy Reports
issn 2352-4847
publishDate 2020-12-01
description The energy performance of buildings directive establishes that Member States must introduce minimum energy performance requirements for buildings and building components. Studies must be done based on a cost-optimal level methodology, considering the investment and operational costs to reach nearly Zero Energy Buildings. However, there is a lack of information on the European Union guidelines concerning social and environmental issues. The existent framework requires Member States to make the calculations based on an economic perspective — a macroeconomic level and a financial level. Thus, the three-pillars (social, economic, and environmental) conception of sustainability is not fulfilled in the implementation of the present cost-optimal levels methodology. Neither indoor environmental quality is considered nor the environmental impact of the embodied CO2 in building components. Apart from this, current energy performance certificates are only energy-related. However, they have the potential to track also indoor environmental quality and the global environmental impact of building components. A new approach, both for cost-optimal levels and energy performance certificates, considering indoor environmental quality and the embodied CO2 in building components through a life cycle assessment, could fill the social and the environmental gaps.
topic Cost-optimal levels
Energy performance certificates
Health
Indoor environmental quality
Life cycle assessment
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352484720315973
work_keys_str_mv AT alexandresoaresdosreis costoptimallevelsandenergyperformancecertificatesfillingthegaps
AT martaferreiradias costoptimallevelsandenergyperformancecertificatesfillingthegaps
_version_ 1724373331966164992