Questionnaire survey on patient awareness of invasive rebiopsy in advanced non‐small cell lung cancer

• Main Authors: Tomoya Fukui, Mikiko Ishihara, Masashi Kasajima, Yasuhiro Hiyoshi, Yoshiro Nakahara, Sakiko Otani, Satoshi Igawa, Masanori Yokoba, Hisashi Mitsufuji, Masaru Kubota, Masato Katagiri, Jiichiro Sasaki, Katsuhiko Naoki
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: Wiley 2019-03-01
• Series: Thoracic Cancer
• Subjects: Bronchoscopy; invasive; non‐small cell lung cancer; patient awareness survey; rebiopsy
• Online Access: https://doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.12964

Background Treatment strategies for patients with non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) depend on various factors including physical condition, complications, tumor histology, and molecular profiling. Even if initial chemotherapy is efficacious, almost all patients develop treatment resistance. Invasive rebiopsy from sites of recurrence might provide insight into resistance mechanisms and aid in the selection of suitable sequential antitumor drugs. However, invasive rebiopsy might be challenging because of limited tissue availability and patient burden. Therefore, this study aimed to assess awareness of invasive rebiopsy among non‐small cell lung cancer patients. Methods This prospective questionnaire survey was performed between June 2015 and March 2016 in patients with advanced non‐small cell lung cancer. The survey was carried out at two time points: before starting first‐line chemotherapy (cohort 1), and at the time of disease progression after initial chemotherapy, but before second‐line chemotherapy (cohort 2). Results In this study, 50 and 30 patients were enrolled in cohorts 1 and 2, respectively. In cohort 1, 37 (74%) patients agreed to rebiopsy, if disease progression occurred, whereas 18 (60%) patients in cohort 2 agreed to invasive rebiopsy at disease progression. The primary reasons for rebiopsy rejection were poor physical condition and patient burden related to the initial biopsy. Seven patients answered the survey questions during the treatment course, and the acceptance rate was lower among patients who agreed to rebiopsy at disease progression than before treatment. Conclusions Invasive rebiopsy can lead to distress in some patients. To improve the consent rate for tissue rebiopsy, treatment strategies including rebiopsy should be discussed with patients during the early treatment phase.