Dosimetric Comparison of Various Radiotherapeutic Treatment Plans Using Cobalt-60 and Linac for Prostate Cancer

Introduction: This study was designed to evaluate dosimetric parameters such as rectal dose, bladder dose, integral dose (ID), homogeneity index (HI) and conformity index (CI) in various treatment plans for prostate cancer. Materials and Methods: Pelvic computed tomography (CT) scans of 27 patients...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Seyed Ali Vaezzadeh, Mahmood Allahverdi, Hasan Nedaie, Mahdi Aghili, Mahbod Esfehani, Ehsan Mohammadi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Mashhad University of Medical Sciences 2009-06-01
Series:Iranian Journal of Medical Physics
Subjects:
Online Access:http://ijmp.mums.ac.ir/article_7297_037781e9a66f8b93d283d88a29c80e04.pdf
id doaj-a8ab4b2234fe4db990c08caf420b25b1
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a8ab4b2234fe4db990c08caf420b25b12020-11-24T22:43:26ZengMashhad University of Medical SciencesIranian Journal of Medical Physics2345-36722345-36722009-06-0162717910.22038/ijmp.2009.72977297Dosimetric Comparison of Various Radiotherapeutic Treatment Plans Using Cobalt-60 and Linac for Prostate CancerSeyed Ali Vaezzadeh0Mahmood Allahverdi1Hasan Nedaie2Mahdi Aghili3Mahbod Esfehani4Ehsan Mohammadi5Ph. D. Student in Medical Physics, Tehran University of Medical Science, Tehran, IranAssociate Professor, Medical Physics Dept., Tehran University of Medical Science, Tehran, IranAssistant Professor, Radiotherapy Dept., Cancer Institute, Tehran University of Medical Science, Tehran, IranAssistant Professor, Radiotherapy Dept., Cancer Institute, Tehran University of Medical Science, Tehran, IranM.Sc. in Medical Physics, Radiotherapy Dept., Cancer Institute, Tehran University of Medical Science, Tehran, IranM.Sc. in Medical Physics, Radiotherapy Dept., Cancer Institute, Tehran University of Medical Science, Tehran, IranIntroduction: This study was designed to evaluate dosimetric parameters such as rectal dose, bladder dose, integral dose (ID), homogeneity index (HI) and conformity index (CI) in various treatment plans for prostate cancer. Materials and Methods: Pelvic computed tomography (CT) scans of 27 patients were acquired and transferred to the RTDosePLAN treatment planning system. For each patient, 8 conventional plans (3, 4, 5 and 6 fields) were planned for the cobalt-60 photon energy. Subsequently, the same plans were performed for 6 MV and 18 MV photon energies. Results: By increasing the energy of the beam relative to the cobalt-60 energy, the Dmean values for rectum and bladder were reduced from 3% to 4% and 4% to 6%, respectively, the dose received by the whole of the bladder volume decreased by 26% for 6 MV and by 58% for 18 MV. Increasing the photon beam energy decreased CI to 7% and 10%, ID was decreased by10% and 20% and Dmax was decreased by 3% and 4%, respectively. Discussion and Conclusion: A six-field treatment plan in comparison to the other plans offers the minimum dose to critical organs and sufficient dose to the prostate. Increasing the photon energy improves the treatment parameters of the bladder and the PTV.http://ijmp.mums.ac.ir/article_7297_037781e9a66f8b93d283d88a29c80e04.pdfProstate CancerTreatment planIntegral doseLinacCobalt-60
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Seyed Ali Vaezzadeh
Mahmood Allahverdi
Hasan Nedaie
Mahdi Aghili
Mahbod Esfehani
Ehsan Mohammadi
spellingShingle Seyed Ali Vaezzadeh
Mahmood Allahverdi
Hasan Nedaie
Mahdi Aghili
Mahbod Esfehani
Ehsan Mohammadi
Dosimetric Comparison of Various Radiotherapeutic Treatment Plans Using Cobalt-60 and Linac for Prostate Cancer
Iranian Journal of Medical Physics
Prostate Cancer
Treatment plan
Integral dose
Linac
Cobalt-60
author_facet Seyed Ali Vaezzadeh
Mahmood Allahverdi
Hasan Nedaie
Mahdi Aghili
Mahbod Esfehani
Ehsan Mohammadi
author_sort Seyed Ali Vaezzadeh
title Dosimetric Comparison of Various Radiotherapeutic Treatment Plans Using Cobalt-60 and Linac for Prostate Cancer
title_short Dosimetric Comparison of Various Radiotherapeutic Treatment Plans Using Cobalt-60 and Linac for Prostate Cancer
title_full Dosimetric Comparison of Various Radiotherapeutic Treatment Plans Using Cobalt-60 and Linac for Prostate Cancer
title_fullStr Dosimetric Comparison of Various Radiotherapeutic Treatment Plans Using Cobalt-60 and Linac for Prostate Cancer
title_full_unstemmed Dosimetric Comparison of Various Radiotherapeutic Treatment Plans Using Cobalt-60 and Linac for Prostate Cancer
title_sort dosimetric comparison of various radiotherapeutic treatment plans using cobalt-60 and linac for prostate cancer
publisher Mashhad University of Medical Sciences
series Iranian Journal of Medical Physics
issn 2345-3672
2345-3672
publishDate 2009-06-01
description Introduction: This study was designed to evaluate dosimetric parameters such as rectal dose, bladder dose, integral dose (ID), homogeneity index (HI) and conformity index (CI) in various treatment plans for prostate cancer. Materials and Methods: Pelvic computed tomography (CT) scans of 27 patients were acquired and transferred to the RTDosePLAN treatment planning system. For each patient, 8 conventional plans (3, 4, 5 and 6 fields) were planned for the cobalt-60 photon energy. Subsequently, the same plans were performed for 6 MV and 18 MV photon energies. Results: By increasing the energy of the beam relative to the cobalt-60 energy, the Dmean values for rectum and bladder were reduced from 3% to 4% and 4% to 6%, respectively, the dose received by the whole of the bladder volume decreased by 26% for 6 MV and by 58% for 18 MV. Increasing the photon beam energy decreased CI to 7% and 10%, ID was decreased by10% and 20% and Dmax was decreased by 3% and 4%, respectively. Discussion and Conclusion: A six-field treatment plan in comparison to the other plans offers the minimum dose to critical organs and sufficient dose to the prostate. Increasing the photon energy improves the treatment parameters of the bladder and the PTV.
topic Prostate Cancer
Treatment plan
Integral dose
Linac
Cobalt-60
url http://ijmp.mums.ac.ir/article_7297_037781e9a66f8b93d283d88a29c80e04.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT seyedalivaezzadeh dosimetriccomparisonofvariousradiotherapeutictreatmentplansusingcobalt60andlinacforprostatecancer
AT mahmoodallahverdi dosimetriccomparisonofvariousradiotherapeutictreatmentplansusingcobalt60andlinacforprostatecancer
AT hasannedaie dosimetriccomparisonofvariousradiotherapeutictreatmentplansusingcobalt60andlinacforprostatecancer
AT mahdiaghili dosimetriccomparisonofvariousradiotherapeutictreatmentplansusingcobalt60andlinacforprostatecancer
AT mahbodesfehani dosimetriccomparisonofvariousradiotherapeutictreatmentplansusingcobalt60andlinacforprostatecancer
AT ehsanmohammadi dosimetriccomparisonofvariousradiotherapeutictreatmentplansusingcobalt60andlinacforprostatecancer
_version_ 1725695836596207616