Do Individual Differences and Aging Effects in the Estimation of Geographical Slant Reflect Cognitive or Perceptual Effects?
Several individual differences including age have been suggested to affect the perception of slant. A cross-sectional study of outdoor hill estimation ( N = 106) was analyzed using individual difference measures of age, experiential knowledge, fitness, personality traits, and sex. Of particular not...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SAGE Publishing
2016-07-01
|
Series: | i-Perception |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1177/2041669516658665 |
id |
doaj-a87e7bd88c83453c8b258e086433b6e4 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-a87e7bd88c83453c8b258e086433b6e42020-11-25T03:44:02ZengSAGE Publishingi-Perception2041-66952016-07-01710.1177/204166951665866510.1177_2041669516658665Do Individual Differences and Aging Effects in the Estimation of Geographical Slant Reflect Cognitive or Perceptual Effects?Abigail M. DeanJaehyun OhChristopher J. ThomsonCatherine J. NorrisFrank H. DurginSeveral individual differences including age have been suggested to affect the perception of slant. A cross-sectional study of outdoor hill estimation ( N = 106) was analyzed using individual difference measures of age, experiential knowledge, fitness, personality traits, and sex. Of particular note, it was found that for participants who reported any experiential knowledge about slant, estimates decreased (i.e., became more accurate) as conscientiousness increased, suggesting that more conscientious individuals were more deliberate about taking their experiential knowledge (rather than perception) into account. Effects of fitness were limited to those without experiential knowledge, suggesting that they, too, may be cognitive rather than perceptual. The observed effects of age, which tended to produce lower, more accurate estimates of hill slant, provide more evidence that older adults do not see hills as steeper. The main effect of age was to lower slant estimates; such effects may be due to implicit experiential knowledge acquired over a lifetime. The results indicate the impact of cognitive, rather than perceptual factors on individual differences in slant estimation.https://doi.org/10.1177/2041669516658665 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Abigail M. Dean Jaehyun Oh Christopher J. Thomson Catherine J. Norris Frank H. Durgin |
spellingShingle |
Abigail M. Dean Jaehyun Oh Christopher J. Thomson Catherine J. Norris Frank H. Durgin Do Individual Differences and Aging Effects in the Estimation of Geographical Slant Reflect Cognitive or Perceptual Effects? i-Perception |
author_facet |
Abigail M. Dean Jaehyun Oh Christopher J. Thomson Catherine J. Norris Frank H. Durgin |
author_sort |
Abigail M. Dean |
title |
Do Individual Differences and Aging Effects in the Estimation of Geographical Slant Reflect Cognitive or Perceptual Effects? |
title_short |
Do Individual Differences and Aging Effects in the Estimation of Geographical Slant Reflect Cognitive or Perceptual Effects? |
title_full |
Do Individual Differences and Aging Effects in the Estimation of Geographical Slant Reflect Cognitive or Perceptual Effects? |
title_fullStr |
Do Individual Differences and Aging Effects in the Estimation of Geographical Slant Reflect Cognitive or Perceptual Effects? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Do Individual Differences and Aging Effects in the Estimation of Geographical Slant Reflect Cognitive or Perceptual Effects? |
title_sort |
do individual differences and aging effects in the estimation of geographical slant reflect cognitive or perceptual effects? |
publisher |
SAGE Publishing |
series |
i-Perception |
issn |
2041-6695 |
publishDate |
2016-07-01 |
description |
Several individual differences including age have been suggested to affect the perception of slant. A cross-sectional study of outdoor hill estimation ( N = 106) was analyzed using individual difference measures of age, experiential knowledge, fitness, personality traits, and sex. Of particular note, it was found that for participants who reported any experiential knowledge about slant, estimates decreased (i.e., became more accurate) as conscientiousness increased, suggesting that more conscientious individuals were more deliberate about taking their experiential knowledge (rather than perception) into account. Effects of fitness were limited to those without experiential knowledge, suggesting that they, too, may be cognitive rather than perceptual. The observed effects of age, which tended to produce lower, more accurate estimates of hill slant, provide more evidence that older adults do not see hills as steeper. The main effect of age was to lower slant estimates; such effects may be due to implicit experiential knowledge acquired over a lifetime. The results indicate the impact of cognitive, rather than perceptual factors on individual differences in slant estimation. |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1177/2041669516658665 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT abigailmdean doindividualdifferencesandagingeffectsintheestimationofgeographicalslantreflectcognitiveorperceptualeffects AT jaehyunoh doindividualdifferencesandagingeffectsintheestimationofgeographicalslantreflectcognitiveorperceptualeffects AT christopherjthomson doindividualdifferencesandagingeffectsintheestimationofgeographicalslantreflectcognitiveorperceptualeffects AT catherinejnorris doindividualdifferencesandagingeffectsintheestimationofgeographicalslantreflectcognitiveorperceptualeffects AT frankhdurgin doindividualdifferencesandagingeffectsintheestimationofgeographicalslantreflectcognitiveorperceptualeffects |
_version_ |
1724516534368337920 |