Do Individual Differences and Aging Effects in the Estimation of Geographical Slant Reflect Cognitive or Perceptual Effects?

Several individual differences including age have been suggested to affect the perception of slant. A cross-sectional study of outdoor hill estimation ( N  = 106) was analyzed using individual difference measures of age, experiential knowledge, fitness, personality traits, and sex. Of particular not...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Abigail M. Dean, Jaehyun Oh, Christopher J. Thomson, Catherine J. Norris, Frank H. Durgin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2016-07-01
Series:i-Perception
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/2041669516658665
id doaj-a87e7bd88c83453c8b258e086433b6e4
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a87e7bd88c83453c8b258e086433b6e42020-11-25T03:44:02ZengSAGE Publishingi-Perception2041-66952016-07-01710.1177/204166951665866510.1177_2041669516658665Do Individual Differences and Aging Effects in the Estimation of Geographical Slant Reflect Cognitive or Perceptual Effects?Abigail M. DeanJaehyun OhChristopher J. ThomsonCatherine J. NorrisFrank H. DurginSeveral individual differences including age have been suggested to affect the perception of slant. A cross-sectional study of outdoor hill estimation ( N  = 106) was analyzed using individual difference measures of age, experiential knowledge, fitness, personality traits, and sex. Of particular note, it was found that for participants who reported any experiential knowledge about slant, estimates decreased (i.e., became more accurate) as conscientiousness increased, suggesting that more conscientious individuals were more deliberate about taking their experiential knowledge (rather than perception) into account. Effects of fitness were limited to those without experiential knowledge, suggesting that they, too, may be cognitive rather than perceptual. The observed effects of age, which tended to produce lower, more accurate estimates of hill slant, provide more evidence that older adults do not see hills as steeper. The main effect of age was to lower slant estimates; such effects may be due to implicit experiential knowledge acquired over a lifetime. The results indicate the impact of cognitive, rather than perceptual factors on individual differences in slant estimation.https://doi.org/10.1177/2041669516658665
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Abigail M. Dean
Jaehyun Oh
Christopher J. Thomson
Catherine J. Norris
Frank H. Durgin
spellingShingle Abigail M. Dean
Jaehyun Oh
Christopher J. Thomson
Catherine J. Norris
Frank H. Durgin
Do Individual Differences and Aging Effects in the Estimation of Geographical Slant Reflect Cognitive or Perceptual Effects?
i-Perception
author_facet Abigail M. Dean
Jaehyun Oh
Christopher J. Thomson
Catherine J. Norris
Frank H. Durgin
author_sort Abigail M. Dean
title Do Individual Differences and Aging Effects in the Estimation of Geographical Slant Reflect Cognitive or Perceptual Effects?
title_short Do Individual Differences and Aging Effects in the Estimation of Geographical Slant Reflect Cognitive or Perceptual Effects?
title_full Do Individual Differences and Aging Effects in the Estimation of Geographical Slant Reflect Cognitive or Perceptual Effects?
title_fullStr Do Individual Differences and Aging Effects in the Estimation of Geographical Slant Reflect Cognitive or Perceptual Effects?
title_full_unstemmed Do Individual Differences and Aging Effects in the Estimation of Geographical Slant Reflect Cognitive or Perceptual Effects?
title_sort do individual differences and aging effects in the estimation of geographical slant reflect cognitive or perceptual effects?
publisher SAGE Publishing
series i-Perception
issn 2041-6695
publishDate 2016-07-01
description Several individual differences including age have been suggested to affect the perception of slant. A cross-sectional study of outdoor hill estimation ( N  = 106) was analyzed using individual difference measures of age, experiential knowledge, fitness, personality traits, and sex. Of particular note, it was found that for participants who reported any experiential knowledge about slant, estimates decreased (i.e., became more accurate) as conscientiousness increased, suggesting that more conscientious individuals were more deliberate about taking their experiential knowledge (rather than perception) into account. Effects of fitness were limited to those without experiential knowledge, suggesting that they, too, may be cognitive rather than perceptual. The observed effects of age, which tended to produce lower, more accurate estimates of hill slant, provide more evidence that older adults do not see hills as steeper. The main effect of age was to lower slant estimates; such effects may be due to implicit experiential knowledge acquired over a lifetime. The results indicate the impact of cognitive, rather than perceptual factors on individual differences in slant estimation.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/2041669516658665
work_keys_str_mv AT abigailmdean doindividualdifferencesandagingeffectsintheestimationofgeographicalslantreflectcognitiveorperceptualeffects
AT jaehyunoh doindividualdifferencesandagingeffectsintheestimationofgeographicalslantreflectcognitiveorperceptualeffects
AT christopherjthomson doindividualdifferencesandagingeffectsintheestimationofgeographicalslantreflectcognitiveorperceptualeffects
AT catherinejnorris doindividualdifferencesandagingeffectsintheestimationofgeographicalslantreflectcognitiveorperceptualeffects
AT frankhdurgin doindividualdifferencesandagingeffectsintheestimationofgeographicalslantreflectcognitiveorperceptualeffects
_version_ 1724516534368337920