Reduction and representation: the function(s) of understanding and comparison in, and between, Anthropology and Literature

This article addresses the manner in which the anthropological and literary subjects are fashioned, imagined and transmitted to their audience, being mindful of the manner in which misunderstandings occur in this delicate transposition. It starts by reviewing the longstanding tension in anthropology...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Sean O’ Dubhghaill
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Bucharest 2012-01-01
Series:Journal of Comparative Research in Anthropology and Sociology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://compaso.eu/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/Compaso2012-32-Dubhghaill.pdf
id doaj-a87e3d3d0fe0412a8b9254d48e368e72
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a87e3d3d0fe0412a8b9254d48e368e722020-11-24T22:46:33ZengUniversity of BucharestJournal of Comparative Research in Anthropology and Sociology2068-03172012-01-01326179Reduction and representation: the function(s) of understanding and comparison in, and between, Anthropology and LiteratureSean O’ DubhghaillThis article addresses the manner in which the anthropological and literary subjects are fashioned, imagined and transmitted to their audience, being mindful of the manner in which misunderstandings occur in this delicate transposition. It starts by reviewing the longstanding tension in anthropology between modish theoretical strains, which ethnography incorporates, and anthropological purists who believe that the input from extraneous disciplines cheapens the discipline and renders trivial studies conducted by previous generations of anthropologists. This work adopts a comparative stance borrowing from ethnographies, novels and conventional philosophical work, but the main focus relies on their fundamental comparability to anthropology, as well as the opposite. To close, some in-roads concerning the possibility of synthesising both perspectives are outlined whose special relevance to understanding anthropology is more contingent upon a shift in perspectives and disciplines which renders anthropology both a subject which seeks to understand as well as an understanding subject.http://compaso.eu/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/Compaso2012-32-Dubhghaill.pdfAnthropological representationLiteratureDeleuzeEthnographyComparative Anthropology
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sean O’ Dubhghaill
spellingShingle Sean O’ Dubhghaill
Reduction and representation: the function(s) of understanding and comparison in, and between, Anthropology and Literature
Journal of Comparative Research in Anthropology and Sociology
Anthropological representation
Literature
Deleuze
Ethnography
Comparative Anthropology
author_facet Sean O’ Dubhghaill
author_sort Sean O’ Dubhghaill
title Reduction and representation: the function(s) of understanding and comparison in, and between, Anthropology and Literature
title_short Reduction and representation: the function(s) of understanding and comparison in, and between, Anthropology and Literature
title_full Reduction and representation: the function(s) of understanding and comparison in, and between, Anthropology and Literature
title_fullStr Reduction and representation: the function(s) of understanding and comparison in, and between, Anthropology and Literature
title_full_unstemmed Reduction and representation: the function(s) of understanding and comparison in, and between, Anthropology and Literature
title_sort reduction and representation: the function(s) of understanding and comparison in, and between, anthropology and literature
publisher University of Bucharest
series Journal of Comparative Research in Anthropology and Sociology
issn 2068-0317
publishDate 2012-01-01
description This article addresses the manner in which the anthropological and literary subjects are fashioned, imagined and transmitted to their audience, being mindful of the manner in which misunderstandings occur in this delicate transposition. It starts by reviewing the longstanding tension in anthropology between modish theoretical strains, which ethnography incorporates, and anthropological purists who believe that the input from extraneous disciplines cheapens the discipline and renders trivial studies conducted by previous generations of anthropologists. This work adopts a comparative stance borrowing from ethnographies, novels and conventional philosophical work, but the main focus relies on their fundamental comparability to anthropology, as well as the opposite. To close, some in-roads concerning the possibility of synthesising both perspectives are outlined whose special relevance to understanding anthropology is more contingent upon a shift in perspectives and disciplines which renders anthropology both a subject which seeks to understand as well as an understanding subject.
topic Anthropological representation
Literature
Deleuze
Ethnography
Comparative Anthropology
url http://compaso.eu/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/Compaso2012-32-Dubhghaill.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT seanodubhghaill reductionandrepresentationthefunctionsofunderstandingandcomparisoninandbetweenanthropologyandliterature
_version_ 1725684860092153856