Comment on “Water-processed carbon nanotube/graphene hybrids with enhanced field emission properties” [AIP Advances 5, 097130 (2015)]

In their research paper, M. Song et al. [AIP ADVANCES 5, 097130 (2015)] have claimed to have achieved enhanced field emission (FE) characteristics of carbon nanotubes (CNT)/graphene hybrids experimentally, exhibiting improved FE parameters e.g. turn-on electric field of 0.79 V/μm, threshold electric...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Reena Rani, Ravi Bhatia
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: AIP Publishing LLC 2018-03-01
Series:AIP Advances
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.5018407
id doaj-a8652f244e554cd6b70faeeece77ae1a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a8652f244e554cd6b70faeeece77ae1a2020-11-25T01:58:21ZengAIP Publishing LLCAIP Advances2158-32262018-03-0183039101039101-210.1063/1.5018407078803ADVComment on “Water-processed carbon nanotube/graphene hybrids with enhanced field emission properties” [AIP Advances 5, 097130 (2015)]Reena Rani0Ravi Bhatia1Department of Physics, Guru Jambheshwar University of Science and Technology, Hisar 125001, IndiaDepartment of Physics, Guru Jambheshwar University of Science and Technology, Hisar 125001, IndiaIn their research paper, M. Song et al. [AIP ADVANCES 5, 097130 (2015)] have claimed to have achieved enhanced field emission (FE) characteristics of carbon nanotubes (CNT)/graphene hybrids experimentally, exhibiting improved FE parameters e.g. turn-on electric field of 0.79 V/μm, threshold electric field of 1.05 V/μm, maximum emission current density (Jmax) of 5.76 mA/cm2, and field enhancement factor (β) of ∼1.3 × 104. The authors have emphasized on the surprisingly high value of β to be the basis of their claim of achieving superior FE performance which is further attributed to the optimized mass ratio CNT/ graphene, which is 5:1 in the present case. However, the claim based upon high value of β is misleading because it does not corroborate with the obtained Jmax parameter. Also, the obtained value of J is quite low in the mentioned study as compared to the reported values. For an instance, Sameera et al. [J. Appl. Phys. 111, 044307 (2012) & Appl. Phys. Lett. 102, 033102 (2013)] have reported FE properties of CNT composites and reduced graphene oxide with Jmax and β values of the order of ∼102 mA/cm2 and 6 × 103, respectively. Therefore, the conclusions drawn by M. Song et al. [AIP ADVANCES 5, 097130 (2015)] in their paper do no hold.http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.5018407
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Reena Rani
Ravi Bhatia
spellingShingle Reena Rani
Ravi Bhatia
Comment on “Water-processed carbon nanotube/graphene hybrids with enhanced field emission properties” [AIP Advances 5, 097130 (2015)]
AIP Advances
author_facet Reena Rani
Ravi Bhatia
author_sort Reena Rani
title Comment on “Water-processed carbon nanotube/graphene hybrids with enhanced field emission properties” [AIP Advances 5, 097130 (2015)]
title_short Comment on “Water-processed carbon nanotube/graphene hybrids with enhanced field emission properties” [AIP Advances 5, 097130 (2015)]
title_full Comment on “Water-processed carbon nanotube/graphene hybrids with enhanced field emission properties” [AIP Advances 5, 097130 (2015)]
title_fullStr Comment on “Water-processed carbon nanotube/graphene hybrids with enhanced field emission properties” [AIP Advances 5, 097130 (2015)]
title_full_unstemmed Comment on “Water-processed carbon nanotube/graphene hybrids with enhanced field emission properties” [AIP Advances 5, 097130 (2015)]
title_sort comment on “water-processed carbon nanotube/graphene hybrids with enhanced field emission properties” [aip advances 5, 097130 (2015)]
publisher AIP Publishing LLC
series AIP Advances
issn 2158-3226
publishDate 2018-03-01
description In their research paper, M. Song et al. [AIP ADVANCES 5, 097130 (2015)] have claimed to have achieved enhanced field emission (FE) characteristics of carbon nanotubes (CNT)/graphene hybrids experimentally, exhibiting improved FE parameters e.g. turn-on electric field of 0.79 V/μm, threshold electric field of 1.05 V/μm, maximum emission current density (Jmax) of 5.76 mA/cm2, and field enhancement factor (β) of ∼1.3 × 104. The authors have emphasized on the surprisingly high value of β to be the basis of their claim of achieving superior FE performance which is further attributed to the optimized mass ratio CNT/ graphene, which is 5:1 in the present case. However, the claim based upon high value of β is misleading because it does not corroborate with the obtained Jmax parameter. Also, the obtained value of J is quite low in the mentioned study as compared to the reported values. For an instance, Sameera et al. [J. Appl. Phys. 111, 044307 (2012) & Appl. Phys. Lett. 102, 033102 (2013)] have reported FE properties of CNT composites and reduced graphene oxide with Jmax and β values of the order of ∼102 mA/cm2 and 6 × 103, respectively. Therefore, the conclusions drawn by M. Song et al. [AIP ADVANCES 5, 097130 (2015)] in their paper do no hold.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.5018407
work_keys_str_mv AT reenarani commentonwaterprocessedcarbonnanotubegraphenehybridswithenhancedfieldemissionpropertiesaipadvances50971302015
AT ravibhatia commentonwaterprocessedcarbonnanotubegraphenehybridswithenhancedfieldemissionpropertiesaipadvances50971302015
_version_ 1724970140755296256