Comment on “Water-processed carbon nanotube/graphene hybrids with enhanced field emission properties” [AIP Advances 5, 097130 (2015)]
In their research paper, M. Song et al. [AIP ADVANCES 5, 097130 (2015)] have claimed to have achieved enhanced field emission (FE) characteristics of carbon nanotubes (CNT)/graphene hybrids experimentally, exhibiting improved FE parameters e.g. turn-on electric field of 0.79 V/μm, threshold electric...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
AIP Publishing LLC
2018-03-01
|
Series: | AIP Advances |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.5018407 |
id |
doaj-a8652f244e554cd6b70faeeece77ae1a |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-a8652f244e554cd6b70faeeece77ae1a2020-11-25T01:58:21ZengAIP Publishing LLCAIP Advances2158-32262018-03-0183039101039101-210.1063/1.5018407078803ADVComment on “Water-processed carbon nanotube/graphene hybrids with enhanced field emission properties” [AIP Advances 5, 097130 (2015)]Reena Rani0Ravi Bhatia1Department of Physics, Guru Jambheshwar University of Science and Technology, Hisar 125001, IndiaDepartment of Physics, Guru Jambheshwar University of Science and Technology, Hisar 125001, IndiaIn their research paper, M. Song et al. [AIP ADVANCES 5, 097130 (2015)] have claimed to have achieved enhanced field emission (FE) characteristics of carbon nanotubes (CNT)/graphene hybrids experimentally, exhibiting improved FE parameters e.g. turn-on electric field of 0.79 V/μm, threshold electric field of 1.05 V/μm, maximum emission current density (Jmax) of 5.76 mA/cm2, and field enhancement factor (β) of ∼1.3 × 104. The authors have emphasized on the surprisingly high value of β to be the basis of their claim of achieving superior FE performance which is further attributed to the optimized mass ratio CNT/ graphene, which is 5:1 in the present case. However, the claim based upon high value of β is misleading because it does not corroborate with the obtained Jmax parameter. Also, the obtained value of J is quite low in the mentioned study as compared to the reported values. For an instance, Sameera et al. [J. Appl. Phys. 111, 044307 (2012) & Appl. Phys. Lett. 102, 033102 (2013)] have reported FE properties of CNT composites and reduced graphene oxide with Jmax and β values of the order of ∼102 mA/cm2 and 6 × 103, respectively. Therefore, the conclusions drawn by M. Song et al. [AIP ADVANCES 5, 097130 (2015)] in their paper do no hold.http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.5018407 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Reena Rani Ravi Bhatia |
spellingShingle |
Reena Rani Ravi Bhatia Comment on “Water-processed carbon nanotube/graphene hybrids with enhanced field emission properties” [AIP Advances 5, 097130 (2015)] AIP Advances |
author_facet |
Reena Rani Ravi Bhatia |
author_sort |
Reena Rani |
title |
Comment on “Water-processed carbon nanotube/graphene hybrids with enhanced field emission properties” [AIP Advances 5, 097130 (2015)] |
title_short |
Comment on “Water-processed carbon nanotube/graphene hybrids with enhanced field emission properties” [AIP Advances 5, 097130 (2015)] |
title_full |
Comment on “Water-processed carbon nanotube/graphene hybrids with enhanced field emission properties” [AIP Advances 5, 097130 (2015)] |
title_fullStr |
Comment on “Water-processed carbon nanotube/graphene hybrids with enhanced field emission properties” [AIP Advances 5, 097130 (2015)] |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comment on “Water-processed carbon nanotube/graphene hybrids with enhanced field emission properties” [AIP Advances 5, 097130 (2015)] |
title_sort |
comment on “water-processed carbon nanotube/graphene hybrids with enhanced field emission properties” [aip advances 5, 097130 (2015)] |
publisher |
AIP Publishing LLC |
series |
AIP Advances |
issn |
2158-3226 |
publishDate |
2018-03-01 |
description |
In their research paper, M. Song et al. [AIP ADVANCES 5, 097130 (2015)] have claimed to have achieved enhanced field emission (FE) characteristics of carbon nanotubes (CNT)/graphene hybrids experimentally, exhibiting improved FE parameters e.g. turn-on electric field of 0.79 V/μm, threshold electric field of 1.05 V/μm, maximum emission current density (Jmax) of 5.76 mA/cm2, and field enhancement factor (β) of ∼1.3 × 104. The authors have emphasized on the surprisingly high value of β to be the basis of their claim of achieving superior FE performance which is further attributed to the optimized mass ratio CNT/ graphene, which is 5:1 in the present case. However, the claim based upon high value of β is misleading because it does not corroborate with the obtained Jmax parameter. Also, the obtained value of J is quite low in the mentioned study as compared to the reported values. For an instance, Sameera et al. [J. Appl. Phys. 111, 044307 (2012) & Appl. Phys. Lett. 102, 033102 (2013)] have reported FE properties of CNT composites and reduced graphene oxide with Jmax and β values of the order of ∼102 mA/cm2 and 6 × 103, respectively. Therefore, the conclusions drawn by M. Song et al. [AIP ADVANCES 5, 097130 (2015)] in their paper do no hold. |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.5018407 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT reenarani commentonwaterprocessedcarbonnanotubegraphenehybridswithenhancedfieldemissionpropertiesaipadvances50971302015 AT ravibhatia commentonwaterprocessedcarbonnanotubegraphenehybridswithenhancedfieldemissionpropertiesaipadvances50971302015 |
_version_ |
1724970140755296256 |