A weekly Arctic sea-ice thickness data record from merged CryoSat-2 and SMOS satellite data
Sea-ice thickness on a global scale is derived from different satellite sensors using independent retrieval methods. Due to the sensor and orbit characteristics, such satellite retrievals differ in spatial and temporal resolution as well as in the sensitivity to certain sea-ice types and thickne...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Copernicus Publications
2017-07-01
|
Series: | The Cryosphere |
Online Access: | https://www.the-cryosphere.net/11/1607/2017/tc-11-1607-2017.pdf |
Summary: | Sea-ice thickness on a global scale is derived from different satellite
sensors using independent retrieval methods. Due to the sensor and orbit
characteristics, such satellite retrievals differ in spatial and temporal
resolution as well as in the sensitivity to certain sea-ice types and
thickness ranges. Satellite altimeters, such as CryoSat-2 (CS2), sense the
height of the ice surface above the sea level, which can be converted into
sea-ice thickness. Relative uncertainties associated with this method are
large over thin ice regimes. Another retrieval method is based on the
evaluation of surface brightness temperature (TB) in L-band microwave frequencies
(1.4 GHz) with a thickness-dependent emission model, as measured by the Soil
Moisture and Ocean Salinity (SMOS) satellite. While the radiometer-based
method looses sensitivity for thick sea ice (> 1 m), relative
uncertainties over thin ice are significantly smaller than for the
altimetry-based retrievals. In addition, the SMOS product provides global
sea-ice coverage on a daily basis unlike the altimeter data. This study
presents the first merged product of complementary weekly Arctic sea-ice
thickness data records from the CS2 altimeter and SMOS radiometer. We use two
merging approaches: a weighted mean (WM) and an optimal interpolation (OI) scheme.
While the weighted mean leaves gaps between CS2 orbits, OI is used to produce
weekly Arctic-wide sea-ice thickness fields. The benefit of the data merging
is shown by a comparison with airborne electromagnetic (AEM) induction sounding
measurements. When compared to airborne thickness data in the Barents Sea,
the merged product has a root mean square deviation (RMSD) of about 0.7 m less than
the CS2 product and therefore demonstrates the capability to enhance the CS2
product in thin ice regimes. However, in mixed first-year (FYI) and multiyear (MYI) ice
regimes as in the Beaufort Sea, the CS2 retrieval shows the lowest bias. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1994-0416 1994-0424 |