Can flexor tenosynovectomy and microsurgical epineurectomy improve clinical outcomes following open carpal tunnel release?
Introduction: The purpose of this study was to comparatively evaluate the clinical outcomes of open carpal tunnel release with or without flexor tenosynovectomy and epineurectomy for the treatment of idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome. Methods: In this prospective single-blinded study, 61 w...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
EDP Sciences
2017-01-01
|
Series: | SICOT-J |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1051/sicotj/2017009 |
id |
doaj-a84f27590a844169aa7253f3d343db16 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-a84f27590a844169aa7253f3d343db162021-02-02T01:40:27ZengEDP SciencesSICOT-J2426-88872017-01-0132810.1051/sicotj/2017009sicotj160133Can flexor tenosynovectomy and microsurgical epineurectomy improve clinical outcomes following open carpal tunnel release?Duman SerdaSahin VedatSofu HakanCamurcu YalkinUcpunar HanifiIntroduction: The purpose of this study was to comparatively evaluate the clinical outcomes of open carpal tunnel release with or without flexor tenosynovectomy and epineurectomy for the treatment of idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome. Methods: In this prospective single-blinded study, 61 wrists of 47 patients randomized to open carpal tunnel release without (Group-1) or with (Group-2) flexor tenosynovectomy and microsurgical epineurectomy. Physical examination including Phalen and Tinel’s signs, visible thenar atrophy, two-point discrimination, and grip strength measurement was performed. Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Quick Disability of Arm Shoulder Hand (DASH) Questionnaire, Symptoms Severity Scale, Functional Status Scale, and electrophysiological study were assessed. Results: The increase in the grip strength and Quick Disability of Arm Shoulder Hand Questionnaire score were significantly better in flexor tenosynovectomy and microsurgical epineurectomy group. The average pre-operative two-point discrimination was 6.3 ± 2 mm in Group-1 and 5.8 ± 1.7 mm in Group-2. Post-operatively at the end of 12 months, the mean two-point discrimination was measured as 5.9 ± 1.6 mm in Group-1 and 5.6 ± 1.3 mm in Group-2. When we compare the two groups according to the changes in VAS, Quick-DASH, symptoms severity scale, and functional status scale, only Quick-DASH score improvement was significantly better in Group-2 (p < 0.05). Improvements in VAS, symptoms severity scale, and functional status scale did not differ significantly. Conclusion: We do not recommend routine flexor tenosynovectomy and microsurgical epineurectomy during open carpal tunnel release in patients with idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome.https://doi.org/10.1051/sicotj/2017009Carpal tunnelMedian nerveFlexor tenosynovectomyEpineurectomy |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Duman Serda Sahin Vedat Sofu Hakan Camurcu Yalkin Ucpunar Hanifi |
spellingShingle |
Duman Serda Sahin Vedat Sofu Hakan Camurcu Yalkin Ucpunar Hanifi Can flexor tenosynovectomy and microsurgical epineurectomy improve clinical outcomes following open carpal tunnel release? SICOT-J Carpal tunnel Median nerve Flexor tenosynovectomy Epineurectomy |
author_facet |
Duman Serda Sahin Vedat Sofu Hakan Camurcu Yalkin Ucpunar Hanifi |
author_sort |
Duman Serda |
title |
Can flexor tenosynovectomy and microsurgical epineurectomy improve clinical outcomes following open carpal tunnel release? |
title_short |
Can flexor tenosynovectomy and microsurgical epineurectomy improve clinical outcomes following open carpal tunnel release? |
title_full |
Can flexor tenosynovectomy and microsurgical epineurectomy improve clinical outcomes following open carpal tunnel release? |
title_fullStr |
Can flexor tenosynovectomy and microsurgical epineurectomy improve clinical outcomes following open carpal tunnel release? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Can flexor tenosynovectomy and microsurgical epineurectomy improve clinical outcomes following open carpal tunnel release? |
title_sort |
can flexor tenosynovectomy and microsurgical epineurectomy improve clinical outcomes following open carpal tunnel release? |
publisher |
EDP Sciences |
series |
SICOT-J |
issn |
2426-8887 |
publishDate |
2017-01-01 |
description |
Introduction: The purpose of this study was to comparatively evaluate the clinical outcomes of open carpal tunnel release with or without flexor tenosynovectomy and epineurectomy for the treatment of idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome.
Methods: In this prospective single-blinded study, 61 wrists of 47 patients randomized to open carpal tunnel release without (Group-1) or with (Group-2) flexor tenosynovectomy and microsurgical epineurectomy. Physical examination including Phalen and Tinel’s signs, visible thenar atrophy, two-point discrimination, and grip strength measurement was performed. Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Quick Disability of Arm Shoulder Hand (DASH) Questionnaire, Symptoms Severity Scale, Functional Status Scale, and electrophysiological study were assessed.
Results: The increase in the grip strength and Quick Disability of Arm Shoulder Hand Questionnaire score were significantly better in flexor tenosynovectomy and microsurgical epineurectomy group. The average pre-operative two-point discrimination was 6.3 ± 2 mm in Group-1 and 5.8 ± 1.7 mm in Group-2. Post-operatively at the end of 12 months, the mean two-point discrimination was measured as 5.9 ± 1.6 mm in Group-1 and 5.6 ± 1.3 mm in Group-2. When we compare the two groups according to the changes in VAS, Quick-DASH, symptoms severity scale, and functional status scale, only Quick-DASH score improvement was significantly better in Group-2 (p < 0.05). Improvements in VAS, symptoms severity scale, and functional status scale did not differ significantly.
Conclusion: We do not recommend routine flexor tenosynovectomy and microsurgical epineurectomy during open carpal tunnel release in patients with idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome. |
topic |
Carpal tunnel Median nerve Flexor tenosynovectomy Epineurectomy |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1051/sicotj/2017009 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT dumanserda canflexortenosynovectomyandmicrosurgicalepineurectomyimproveclinicaloutcomesfollowingopencarpaltunnelrelease AT sahinvedat canflexortenosynovectomyandmicrosurgicalepineurectomyimproveclinicaloutcomesfollowingopencarpaltunnelrelease AT sofuhakan canflexortenosynovectomyandmicrosurgicalepineurectomyimproveclinicaloutcomesfollowingopencarpaltunnelrelease AT camurcuyalkin canflexortenosynovectomyandmicrosurgicalepineurectomyimproveclinicaloutcomesfollowingopencarpaltunnelrelease AT ucpunarhanifi canflexortenosynovectomyandmicrosurgicalepineurectomyimproveclinicaloutcomesfollowingopencarpaltunnelrelease |
_version_ |
1724311325770776576 |