Feedback reporting of survey data to healthcare aides

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>This project occurred during the course of the Translating Research in Elder Care (TREC) program of research. TREC is a multilevel and longitudinal research program being conducted in the three Canadian Prairie Provinces of Alberta,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hutchinson Alison M, Batra-Garga Neha, Cranley Lisa, Bostrom Anne-Marie, Cummings Greta, Norton Peter, Estabrooks Carole A
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2012-09-01
Series:Implementation Science
Online Access:http://www.implementationscience.com/content/7/1/89
id doaj-a84ef942bba3421cbee522a8f3c0e2b2
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a84ef942bba3421cbee522a8f3c0e2b22020-11-25T00:01:47ZengBMCImplementation Science1748-59082012-09-01718910.1186/1748-5908-7-89Feedback reporting of survey data to healthcare aidesHutchinson Alison MBatra-Garga NehaCranley LisaBostrom Anne-MarieCummings GretaNorton PeterEstabrooks Carole A<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>This project occurred during the course of the Translating Research in Elder Care (TREC) program of research. TREC is a multilevel and longitudinal research program being conducted in the three Canadian Prairie Provinces of Alberta, Saskatchewan, and Manitoba. The main purpose of TREC is to increase understanding about the role of organizational context in influencing knowledge use in residential long-term care settings. The purpose of this study was to evaluate healthcare aides’ (HCAs) perceptions of a one-page poster designed to feed back aggregated data (including demographic information and perceptions about influences on best practice) from the TREC survey they had recently completed.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>A convenience sample of 7 of the 15 nursing homes participating in the TREC research program in Alberta were invited to participate. Specific facility-level summary data were provided to each facility in the form of a one-page poster report. Two weeks following delivery of the report, a convenience sample of HCAs was surveyed using one-to-one structured interviews.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>One hundred twenty-three HCAs responded to the evaluation survey. Overall, HCAs’ opinions about presentation of the feedback report and the understandability, usability, and usefulness of the content were positive. For each report, analysis of data and production and inspection of the report took up to one hour. Information sessions to introduce and explain the reports averaged 18 minutes. Two feedback reports (minimum) were supplied to each facility at a cost of CAN$2.39 per report, for printing and laminating.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>This study highlights not only the feasibility of producing understandable, usable, and useful feedback reports of survey data but also the value and importance of providing feedback to survey respondents. More broadly, the findings suggest that modest strategies may have a positive and desirable effect in participating sites.</p> http://www.implementationscience.com/content/7/1/89
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Hutchinson Alison M
Batra-Garga Neha
Cranley Lisa
Bostrom Anne-Marie
Cummings Greta
Norton Peter
Estabrooks Carole A
spellingShingle Hutchinson Alison M
Batra-Garga Neha
Cranley Lisa
Bostrom Anne-Marie
Cummings Greta
Norton Peter
Estabrooks Carole A
Feedback reporting of survey data to healthcare aides
Implementation Science
author_facet Hutchinson Alison M
Batra-Garga Neha
Cranley Lisa
Bostrom Anne-Marie
Cummings Greta
Norton Peter
Estabrooks Carole A
author_sort Hutchinson Alison M
title Feedback reporting of survey data to healthcare aides
title_short Feedback reporting of survey data to healthcare aides
title_full Feedback reporting of survey data to healthcare aides
title_fullStr Feedback reporting of survey data to healthcare aides
title_full_unstemmed Feedback reporting of survey data to healthcare aides
title_sort feedback reporting of survey data to healthcare aides
publisher BMC
series Implementation Science
issn 1748-5908
publishDate 2012-09-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>This project occurred during the course of the Translating Research in Elder Care (TREC) program of research. TREC is a multilevel and longitudinal research program being conducted in the three Canadian Prairie Provinces of Alberta, Saskatchewan, and Manitoba. The main purpose of TREC is to increase understanding about the role of organizational context in influencing knowledge use in residential long-term care settings. The purpose of this study was to evaluate healthcare aides’ (HCAs) perceptions of a one-page poster designed to feed back aggregated data (including demographic information and perceptions about influences on best practice) from the TREC survey they had recently completed.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>A convenience sample of 7 of the 15 nursing homes participating in the TREC research program in Alberta were invited to participate. Specific facility-level summary data were provided to each facility in the form of a one-page poster report. Two weeks following delivery of the report, a convenience sample of HCAs was surveyed using one-to-one structured interviews.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>One hundred twenty-three HCAs responded to the evaluation survey. Overall, HCAs’ opinions about presentation of the feedback report and the understandability, usability, and usefulness of the content were positive. For each report, analysis of data and production and inspection of the report took up to one hour. Information sessions to introduce and explain the reports averaged 18 minutes. Two feedback reports (minimum) were supplied to each facility at a cost of CAN$2.39 per report, for printing and laminating.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>This study highlights not only the feasibility of producing understandable, usable, and useful feedback reports of survey data but also the value and importance of providing feedback to survey respondents. More broadly, the findings suggest that modest strategies may have a positive and desirable effect in participating sites.</p>
url http://www.implementationscience.com/content/7/1/89
work_keys_str_mv AT hutchinsonalisonm feedbackreportingofsurveydatatohealthcareaides
AT batragarganeha feedbackreportingofsurveydatatohealthcareaides
AT cranleylisa feedbackreportingofsurveydatatohealthcareaides
AT bostromannemarie feedbackreportingofsurveydatatohealthcareaides
AT cummingsgreta feedbackreportingofsurveydatatohealthcareaides
AT nortonpeter feedbackreportingofsurveydatatohealthcareaides
AT estabrookscarolea feedbackreportingofsurveydatatohealthcareaides
_version_ 1725440279807262720